I would not be surprised, the incentive is there for sure.
Seems like using AI to write about AI somehow makes it okay to avoid following scientific standards and still get published

I have some ideas what @olivia.science @irisvanrooij.bsky.social et al. might think about this paper

My PubPeer comment on an AI special article published in JPAD is up: www.pubpeer.com/publications...

I am also not too enthusiastic about the appraisal of AI in the paper, but decided not to get too deep in that subject.

Why an Australian editor for JNNP? There is a term that is rarely used nowadays that describes the Australian sensibility of being a little bit maverick, somewhat iconoclastic. The word is “larrikin”, and far from its original connotat...

This puts his tenure as the EIC of Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry in a new light (2010 --> jnnp.bmj.com/content/81/1/1). I'm not exactly sure when the new EIC stepped in but it must not have been that long ago?

One for the data viz archives

Cross‐sectional study of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 in persons without dementia INTRODUCTION Little is known about plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) in individuals without a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We studied associations of plasma p-tau217 with a...

4/6 Toni T. Saari et al. @saaritt.bsky.social
Cross-sectional study of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 in persons without dementia
Alzheimers Dement (Amst)
🔗 alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

Yes I think this is quite common, but then it wouldn't be medical research as implied in the Declaration?

Seems impossible to follow Declaration of Helsinki without any ethical review

Happy #twinpeaksday to all that celebrate