This new study shows that high-income countries control 70% of voting power in the IMF.
wid.world/news-article...
Plus other striking results in this thread: x.com/gatonievas/s...
From a new ReFED survey:
- 43% respondents say they always or usually discard food near or past the label date, up from 37% in 2016
- 88% said they discard food at least occasionally, up from 84% in 2016
We still need better labeling standardization.
www.seriouseats.com/sell-by-best...
We could go one step further and acknowledge the humanitarian and Western centered lens. "Imperialism crisis"?
Key takeaways from our second monthly digest, featuring some of February's most impactful and interesting studies, reports and news.
February's evidence hits hardest on land and money.
iffs.earth/wp-content/u...
“If Americans increased their protein intake by just 25%…it would require about 100 million acres of additional ag land each year — an area larger than Michigan, Ohio & Pennsylvania combined — & increase annual emissions by 100s of millions of tons of CO2e, according to @worldresources.bsky.social.”
Recent paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
"...the algorithm promotes conservative content & demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm..."
Interested in staying on top of the latest studies and reports related to food systems change? Follow @iffs-earth.bsky.social
@jandutkiewicz.bsky.social and I have thoughts about municipal public grocers. They may do some good if they can compete with major grocers on price, but to take a real bite out of food insecurity, poor people will need more money.
newrepublic.com/article/2046... via @newrepublic.com
It's a seductive narrative, but is it really an eco solution?
New report from our co-founder @nicholasdcarter.bsky.social on regenerative grazing vs dietary change & rewilding @iffs-earth.bsky.social.
Meet some of the folks defending one of the world's most powerful, subsidized & politically connected industries - aka "the resistance". 🙄
Big news!
Plant Based Data is now the Institute for Future Food Systems, at IFFS.Earth
Same roots, stronger mission.
We still use science to drive action, and now we focus even more on amplifying solutions & countering disinformation.
Correct solutions aren't enough: we need to communicate them correctly. See Potential Energy's valuable guide on what works (and what doesn’t) in climate change communication and the language to use to inspire people to demand action on the solutions.
potentialenergycoalition.org/uncategorize...
Netanyahu abandoning the ceasefire deal to salvage his radical far-right government is despicable.
Stick to the deal. Free the hostages. End the killing. Withdraw from Gaza.
It’s sickening to see a renewed military offensive, so many more kids dead, and any semblance of peace disappear.
"We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give."
“To me, the seed library is part of food security. It’s like having money in the bank, but it’s seeds in the library,” said Farm manager Perry Acworth, who organized a Little Free Seed Library during the pandemic.
The @nytimes.com role in this officially shreds any last credibility it could possibly claim to have.
This is not journalism; it's crystal clear complicity.
Instead @nytimes.com reports on neither while deflecting attention away from the famine.
Please immediately correct this reporting.
Yet @nytimes.com amplifies this as a 'real dispute'. Without vetting the three page report. While repeating the US and Israel's erroneous narrative? Wow.
Israel’s use of food as a weapon has been well-documented.
The headlines should be:
1. The famine
2. The State department's role
To recap:
Famine in Gaza was identified using long standing criteria: deaths per day, extreme food shortages, and mass malnutrition.
Without even reading the report, the State Dept dismissed it report and *had it removed*.
If your work involves advocacy, "How Minds Change" by @davidmcraney.bsky.social is a must-read.
The key to helping people open their minds is not to focus on the what, but on *the why*.
As Duhig writes in "Supercommunicators" communication is about connection.
www.goodreads.com/book/show/57...
“Governments are underestimating or ignoring the links between 5 key areas: biodiversity, water, food, health and climate change”
Agreed! Food production is the #1 global driver of terrestrial biodiversity loss and water use, the #2 driver of climate change, and diets are closely linked to health 🧪
My first mute on Blue Sky quicker than expected
On the power of leadership:
"Politicians,celebrities & business leaders who lead by example with high-impact low-carbon behaviours increase public willingness to adopt these behaviours.
High-impact behaviours = ⬇️flying ,⬇️meat, drive EV, ⬆️home energy efficiency, ⬆️public transport & active travel."
I appreciate the hope but, as this piece states, pressure on US corporations & banks and a supportive Congress were key.
Those key components are much more out of reach here. The much bigger multinationals & banks today are more integrated with Israeli economy & Congress is in the pocket of AIPAC.
Good read from @jesslsr.bsky.social
"Regenesis" by George Monbiot & maybe "Not the end of the world" by Hannah Ritchie
Infographic titled 'Compensation for atmospheric appropriation' with text that says 'Countries in the global North hold overwhelming responsibility for climate breakdown, and could be liable to pay $170 trillion in compensation by 2050 to ensure climate targets are met.' Stacked bar charts show climate finance from overemitting countries, such as the USA, EU, and the rest of the global North, flowing to low-emitting countries within their fair shares of global carbon budgets, as compensation for mitigating far more rapidly than would otherwise be required, such as India, China, sub-Saharan Africa, and the rest of the global South.
If you see the atmosphere as a commons - a natural wealth for everyone to access equitably and sustainably - then it's not hard to see how deeply unjust the #COP29 $300bn per year goal from industrialised countries is, when historical responsibilities for excess emissions are taken into account. 1/
"Last month in Nature Communications, researchers put a number on it: The Global South’s workforce provides a staggering 90% of the labor to power the world economy, yet gets only 21% of global income."
Meanwhile, here's a key Q:
If the government doesn't want to address two state solution, illegal WB settlements or root issues (e.g. right of return) what peace prospects existed without annihilating or cleansing before 2023?
Occam's razor: there was no interest or strategy for peace.
Food insecurity, unemployment, poverty & corruption were top Gazan concerns in 2022.
If the goal was to improve security by eradicating Hamas wouldn't it have made sense to help solve these issues vs collective punishment?