Advertisement ยท 728 ร— 90

Posts by

And yes, he was the interviewee :)

Really awesome dev and generally great guy (his thing was memorising pi, I think he was up to 200 digits at the time :) ).

4 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Speaking of guys in capes, when I was working for the software house, on the way into work one of the other guys spotted a dude wearing a cape and a top hat sitting on the curb down the road, we knew there was somebody being interviewed that day and our response was all "wouldn't it be funny if"...

4 hours ago 0 0 1 0

That is the one redeeming factor here :)

But still, without seeing them close up they could be mistaken for other sunglasses.

4 hours ago 2 0 0 0

Usually I blame such things on a lack of coffee :)

5 hours ago 1 0 1 0

๐Ÿคž๐Ÿคž๐Ÿคž๐Ÿคž

And before something even more stupid happens with any luck...

6 hours ago 0 0 0 0

I keep telling people, he misspoke, he meant to say "Free Speech ABOLITIONIST"...

8 hours ago 1 0 1 0

100%

11 hours ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement

Such a pity that smarmy prick wasn't in the office that fateful day...

11 hours ago 3 0 0 0

And even if he did he is guaranteed to get bored and go off on a tangent about his ballroom within about 30 seconds at my guess.

11 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Here's hoping that it's not just *sounding like*...

11 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Yeah, I was considering running a book on how long it would take for him to tangent off to that...

11 hours ago 2 0 1 0

Also, be aware that there are other Meta glasses from Oakley which are a bit more discrete...

bsky.app/profile/tire...

11 hours ago 1 0 1 0

Yup, presumably one of the "forbidden words" on the DOGE list :/

11 hours ago 5 0 1 0

๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰

I will take this glimmer in the darkness, thank you for being the bearer of good news.

11 hours ago 9 0 0 0

Probably closer than any of us REALLY want to know :(

11 hours ago 10 0 0 0

Oh I'm sure that's going on, just like I'm sure that Amazon "walking away" from the Flock partnership was just Amazon realising that they had miscalculated and "walking away" from *talking about it publicly*...

12 hours ago 2 0 0 0

Yeah, nor did I until I was enlightened after making a remark to the effect that "at least those fucking hideous RayBans are easy to spot" :/

13 hours ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

yeah, that does seem a bit odd to me... maybe he's marveling at how completely unfuckable the glasses make him?

13 hours ago 1 0 1 0

That's pretty much their business model, no?

13 hours ago 1 0 0 0

The newer ones from Oakley are even worse :/ (as in harder to identify)

bsky.app/profile/tire...

13 hours ago 2 1 1 0

Not to mention would you really WANT a selfie wearing those hideous things?

13 hours ago 0 0 0 0

IMO there's basically one use-case for these fucking things and it's creeping.

13 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Yup, unfortunately the newer ones from the likes of Oakley are actually getting to be pretty discrete which is IMO very bad...

bsky.app/profile/tire...

13 hours ago 2 0 1 0

I mean it's right there in the band name DEVO*lution*.

13 hours ago 2 0 0 0

And a waiver in the fine print stating that you will be unable to press charges against anybody who punches you for wearing them.

13 hours ago 5 0 0 0

Certainly there's documented cases of creepers with Meta glasses getting punched in the face.

13 hours ago 11 0 0 0

Love this for them...

13 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Here's hoping...

13 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Indeed, "oh wait *I* can personally benefit from this *all in*"

14 hours ago 2 0 1 0

*the whims of one man and the billionaire oligarch arseholes who ensured he'd be installed.

14 hours ago 2 0 0 0