More than half the papers I'm in are missing a review

Why not be public about the definitions and methods used? Hiding so much crucial information raises major skepticism about their approach imo

Strengthening ChatGPT’s responses in sensitive conversations We worked with more than 170 mental health experts to help ChatGPT more reliably recognize signs of distress, respond with care, and guide people toward real-world support–reducing responses that fall...

What is in their "mental health taxonomy" and "emotional reliance taxonomy"? What method do they use to detect this in their data??

The results in this post are entirely predicated on those definitions which, if shoddy, could completely undermine their reported progress.
openai.com/index/streng...

I've gotta hand it to OpenAI - they're very good at *appearing* transparent while in reality withholding crucial information necessary to verifying their claims or holding them accountable

I really enjoyed talking AI "companions" (and a lot more) with Seth and Caroline - you can catch it on Spotify, too - open.spotify.com/episode/6S0r...

OpenAI employees are very excited about how well their new AI tool can create fake videos of people doing crimes and have definitely thought through all the implications of this

Mixed feelings about MORE social media in my life but - let's give it a spin. Who should I follow?