Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by dadude

Post image

#Virginia

9 hours ago 8 5 0 0
Preview
Palantir manifesto described as ‘ramblings of a supervillain’ amid UK contract fears Alarm caused by posts of Alex Karp, tech firm’s CEO, championing US military dominance and of AI weapons

www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

17 hours ago 10 9 1 0
Post image

BELIEVE the #Epstein VICTIMS!!!!!

#Iran

#Epstein

#EpsteinFiles

12 hours ago 982 368 14 11
Video

Democratic House Rep. Troy Carter to RFK Jr. in the HHS budget hearing:

"Respectfully, you know what I really wish you'd spend more time on? More time thinking about the American people, less time talking about whale heads, bear heads, and raccoon parts."

🤣

9 hours ago 953 239 21 7

🎪

8 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Video

Ted Lieu: “The reality is that this cabinet's out of control incompetence & corruption have made it the worst cabinet since 1776

The Atlantic put out an article that shows that Kash Patel appears to be a raging alcoholic — he should not be FBI director. He should go seek help & treatment”

11 hours ago 673 227 30 8
Preview
Tell Meta: Eyewear, Not Spywear Meta intends to add facial recognition technology to their glasses so anyone wearing the product can immediately and invisibly identify strangers. Tell Meta: Your glasses shouldn’t know our names. Demand privacy protections today.

Meta intends to add facial recognition technology to their glasses, enabling wearers to identify strangers and violate their privacy.

Tell Meta: Stop spying on us with your eyewear.

9 hours ago 251 94 10 6

Gfy

8 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Oh, you think we still invest and produce more scientific R&D than China. Nope. That changed in 2024 with Dummy’s Tax Cuts.

- Gross R&D: China $1.03T v US $1.01T
- R&D Growth: China 8.9% v US 4.7%
- 19 of top 25 Universities by scientific output are now Chinese

#DV1 #DemsUnited

14 hours ago 26 15 0 0

🤨

9 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
V. Motion to Use Defendant’s Chants and Statements of Co- Conspirators to Establish the Elements of § 372 and § 111
The government intends to introduce anti-ICE statements and chants made by the defendants and their co-conspirators that were heard by Broadview Police Officers and captured on audio/video recordings regarding surrounding and preventing ICE vehicles from entering the Broadview ICE facility. For example, in addition to anti-ICE chants plainly heard on audio/video recordings at the Broadview facility, on multiple occasions Broadview Police Officers “heard the protestors discuss to not let ICE cars through to their facility.”2 Such evidence will be introduced to show defendants’ motivation and purpose in joining the conspiracy—e.g., it demonstrates that the co-conspirators swarmed and impeded Agent A’s vehicle because of his affiliation with ICE.
These statements and chants will aid the jury’s determination as to whether the government has met the elements of the conspiracy statute and to show
2 This statement and others like it are memorialized in FBI 302s that were furnished to defendants in discovery on April 17, 2026.

V. Motion to Use Defendant’s Chants and Statements of Co- Conspirators to Establish the Elements of § 372 and § 111 The government intends to introduce anti-ICE statements and chants made by the defendants and their co-conspirators that were heard by Broadview Police Officers and captured on audio/video recordings regarding surrounding and preventing ICE vehicles from entering the Broadview ICE facility. For example, in addition to anti-ICE chants plainly heard on audio/video recordings at the Broadview facility, on multiple occasions Broadview Police Officers “heard the protestors discuss to not let ICE cars through to their facility.”2 Such evidence will be introduced to show defendants’ motivation and purpose in joining the conspiracy—e.g., it demonstrates that the co-conspirators swarmed and impeded Agent A’s vehicle because of his affiliation with ICE. These statements and chants will aid the jury’s determination as to whether the government has met the elements of the conspiracy statute and to show 2 This statement and others like it are memorialized in FBI 302s that were furnished to defendants in discovery on April 17, 2026.

defendants’ motive and intent in obstructing Agent A on September 26, 2025. See Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476, 489 (1993) (the First Amendment “does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent”). “Evidence of a defendant’s previous declarations or statements is commonly admitted in criminal trials subject to evidentiary rules dealing with relevancy, reliability, and the like.” Id. Indeed, Mitchell has been cited to uphold the admission of a wide range of statements, including speeches involving civil disobedience and statements given during protest contexts. See also United States v. LeBeau, 654 Fed. Appx. 826 (7th Cir. 2016) (rejecting defendant’s First Amendment challenge when the government offered defendant’s statements to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent); United States v. Fullmer, 584 F.3d 132, 156 (9th Cir. 2009) (statements ordinarily protected by First Amendment are admissible when viewed in context with other conduct to show connection with conspiracy).3
Accordingly, the government seeks a pretrial ruling that it may introduce any statements, including those of unknown co-conspirators, that establish the defendants’ motive, intent, or an element of the crime, such as whether they possessed knowledge of the conspiracy with which they are charged.

3 The court in Fullmer specifically noted that one particular defendant’s conduct—which included writing an editorial and recruiting speakers to travel and advocate on behalf of the organization—was not criminal, and that punishing him based on that conduct alone would be unconstitutional. Fullmer, 584 F.3d at 158. The court nonetheless, citing Mitchell, held that this defendant’s “conduct . . . does provide circumstantial evidence from which a jury could have reasonably inferred that Harper was involved in a conspiracy.” Id.

defendants’ motive and intent in obstructing Agent A on September 26, 2025. See Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476, 489 (1993) (the First Amendment “does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent”). “Evidence of a defendant’s previous declarations or statements is commonly admitted in criminal trials subject to evidentiary rules dealing with relevancy, reliability, and the like.” Id. Indeed, Mitchell has been cited to uphold the admission of a wide range of statements, including speeches involving civil disobedience and statements given during protest contexts. See also United States v. LeBeau, 654 Fed. Appx. 826 (7th Cir. 2016) (rejecting defendant’s First Amendment challenge when the government offered defendant’s statements to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent); United States v. Fullmer, 584 F.3d 132, 156 (9th Cir. 2009) (statements ordinarily protected by First Amendment are admissible when viewed in context with other conduct to show connection with conspiracy).3 Accordingly, the government seeks a pretrial ruling that it may introduce any statements, including those of unknown co-conspirators, that establish the defendants’ motive, intent, or an element of the crime, such as whether they possessed knowledge of the conspiracy with which they are charged. 3 The court in Fullmer specifically noted that one particular defendant’s conduct—which included writing an editorial and recruiting speakers to travel and advocate on behalf of the organization—was not criminal, and that punishing him based on that conduct alone would be unconstitutional. Fullmer, 584 F.3d at 158. The court nonetheless, citing Mitchell, held that this defendant’s “conduct . . . does provide circumstantial evidence from which a jury could have reasonably inferred that Harper was involved in a conspiracy.” Id.

NEW: Federal prosecutors in Chicago say they intend to introduce "anti-ICE statements and chants" during the trial of the remaining "Broadview 6" defendants to show their motivation and that co-conspirators swarmed an ICE agent's vehicle "because of his affiliation with ICE."

9 hours ago 37 12 5 3

🤣🤡

12 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Rep. Veasey (D, Texas) just rinsed RFK Jr. on his anti-vax bullshit, and RFK Jr. responded “everything you said is a lie”.

Veasey said that RFK Jr.

1. Claimed the measles outbreak has been fabricated by government officials to create fear.

2. That Hank Aaron died from the COVID19 vaccine.

13 hours ago 114 33 8 0
Video

WARREN: That's not my question. Are you refusing to tell us if you have investments in vehicles set up by Jeffrey Epstein?

KEVIN WARSH: Those assets will be sold if I'm confirmed

15 hours ago 9169 3383 1005 646

One of the Dominionist's Seven Mountains is MEDIA.

Project 2025 is speeding their takeover of the entire US. You think fundamentalist Islam is bad?

Just wait.

12 hours ago 0 2 0 1

They not only won’t cancel; they’ve handed the entire event over to the fascists.

Stephen Miller and Pete Hegseth are sitting at CBS’ table.

FCC’s Brendan Carr has actually been invited, while he’s trying to take away press freedoms.

18 hours ago 1513 437 61 43

Walking to work is a great start!

12 hours ago 1 0 0 0

🐑

12 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Did American voters really think it was cute to vote for someone whose thing is to call people names? It’s something we’re taught at an early age not to do.
Minor in the scheme of things, but such a telling characteristic.

1 day ago 3030 535 286 31

👽

12 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Foreign donars are too big to fail? 🤔

12 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Every vote counts in Virginia today!

Don't sit this one out – your decision shapes our schools, our roads, our rights, and our communities.

Head to the polls and vote YES for progress.

#VoteYesVirginiaToday

13 hours ago 161 50 6 5

If you’re in Virginia, for the sake of everything that matters to the rest of the civilized world, please get out today and vote yes on the constitutional amendment

16 hours ago 2916 864 63 27
Video

AOC: “If the determination is that Donald #Trump cannot be trusted in the Situation Room & in unfolding scenarios, then he's not fit to be president”

14 hours ago 955 301 24 12
Preview
Senator Murray on Republicans Releasing Their Budget Resolution to Cut Another Blank Check for ICE & Border Patrol | United States Senate Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Committee on Appropriations

Instead of doing literally anything to lower costs, Republicans are now racing to give ICE & CBP another $70 billion without ANY accountability.

Families want relief from sky-high prices, not more of their tax dollars thrown at a rogue agency that doesn’t respect their rights.

13 hours ago 128 45 8 1
Preview
a man wearing a red hat and a denim jacket is holding a skateboard . ALT: a man wearing a red hat and a denim jacket is holding a skateboard .

Rob Sechan @CNBC on Kevin Warsh answering questions from the Senate Banking committee.

"I think he came across about as well as he could to all the constituent audiences including the Republicans who want to see deficit reduction."

12 hours ago 1 2 0 0

🤣

12 hours ago 1 0 0 0

In his defense, it's Jack. You have to cut that shit with something. 😏

13 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
Trump is so illiterate that he had to pre-record his weird af Bible reading and apparently the government will be reading fork the Bible all week on public television

Trump is so illiterate that he had to pre-record his weird af Bible reading and apparently the government will be reading fork the Bible all week on public television

Two things to unpack here:
1) Trump is so illiterate that they had to pre-record him reading the Bible.
2) The Government is going to read the Bible on public tv all week while for weeks they’ve been howling about how Iran is run by religious extremists.

14 hours ago 184 95 31 9
Preview
a man in a patriotic costume holds up his finger in front of a sign that says ' this ' ALT: a man in a patriotic costume holds up his finger in front of a sign that says ' this '
15 hours ago 0 0 0 0