Should I put on my dancing shoes???

Hear, hear!!! SAVE Act failed!👇🏼

These p*icks! No other name for them 🤬👇🏼

Thank you @raskin.house.gov

Please take note 👇🏼

Of note.

🤬

Tell me again how Michael Wolff is all about journalistic integrity
#EpsteinFiles

open.substack.com/pub/jkbjourn...

‘PROTECT SOURCE’: Inside the case of an alleged Epstein victim from Hilton Head A Post and Courier review raises new questions about the treatment of a case of a woman who accused Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump of sexual assault.

An update on Jane Doe 4 of Hilton Head, South Carolina, from the @postandcourier.bsky.social
#EpsteinFiles
www.postandcourier.com/news/trump-e...

“A hold lot of pain headed Donald’s way...Our friends need to get to high ground.” - Epstein to Michael Wolff

November 9, 2018

The FBI Director, the DC US Attorney, and the Secretary of Defense walk into a bar.

Apparently like every day.

The Inside Story of Five Days That Remade the Supreme Court

This SCOTUS clearly is anti-intellectual, among other things. The sheer refusal to examine, analyze, communicate any reasoning or precedent! An imperial not judicial decision-making process. Outrageous.
The Inside Story of Five Days That Remade the Supreme Court www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/u...

NEW: Rumeysa OZTURK — once detained by the Trump admin over a pro-Palestine op-ed — has opted to depart for Turkiye after completing her PhD studies at Tufts, ending her year-long legal battle.

w/ @joshgerstein.bsky.social

www.politico.com/news/2026/04...

A tweet from Representative Thomas Massie that reads: I just viewed 2 Top Secret FISA docs. 1) FISA Court opinion that raises serious concerns about FBI implementation of FISA 702. 2) letter by Senator Wyden describing a secret government interpretation of FISA law. The Constitution requires I vote No on FISA 702 reauthorization.

I sent a classified letter to House and Senate colleagues about a secret interpretation of surveillance law that every American should be concerned about.

Representative Massie is right. The Constitution requires EVERY member to vote against a clean reauthorization.

👀👇🏼

👀

Isn’t it interesting to ponder what will remain as plausible “history”?

#ExcommunicateJD

JFC 👇🏼

You *are* hilarious!!

🤬

DC panel has (again) BLOCKED Judge Boasberg from investigating possible criminal contempt by DOJ and DHS officials, including Judge Bove, in connection with sending Venezuelans to CECOT against his order. (I can't access full ruling yet.) Panel: Judges Rao (Trump) Walker (Trump) & Childs (Obama)

Btw, i wd love to hear about your other sleep tips (and EMDR) if you ever have a chance 🥰

Sloppy slop slop piggy slop

He posted this right after the “Pope Leo is weak on crime and foreign policy” post

Try magnesium glycinate 🥰

#ThingsAreTerribleBut

🥃

USCA Case #26-5101 Document #2168165 Filed: 04/11/2026 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Page 1 of 17 No. 26-5101 September Term, 2025 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Filed On: April 11, 2026 National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States, Appellee V. National Park Service, et al., Appellants Consolidated with 26-5108 BEFORE: Millett, Rao*, and Garcia, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the emergency motion for a stay, which includes a request for a 14-day administrative stay, the supplement to the motion, the opposition to the motion, and the reply, it is ORDERED that the district court's stay of its March 31, 2026 preliminary injunction be extended to April 17, 2026. It is FURTHER ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that these cases be remanded to the district court for further proceedings. On July 31, 2025, the President announced plans to build a 90,000 square-foot ballroom at the site of the White House's East Wing to be paid for by private donors. Add. 92-93. The President assured that he was "fully committed to working with the appropriate organizations to preserv[e] the special history of the White House[.]" Add. 57. Then, on October 20, 2025, "without advance noticel,l" the President posted on social media that "ground ha[d] been broken[.]" Add. 58. Within three days, the East Wing was completely demolished. Add. 93. * A dissenting statement of Circuit Judge Rao is attached.

The stay papers, in short, have raised serious factual questions about the relationship between, on the one hand, above-ground construction of the ballroom itself and the maintenance of safety and security, and prior governmental representations that the below-ground and above-ground stages were distinct and the above-ground design features subject to change, ECF No. 30 at 13, 47; ECF No. 22 at 1 4; ECF No. 18 at 21:16-18 (Defendants could "change the size of the ultimate structure" even after "concrete has been poured[.]"). The district court has not yet had occasion to address those questions. We cannot fairly determine, on this hurried record, whether and to what extent the district court's "necessary for safety and security" exception addresses Defendants' claims of irreparable harm, insofar as it may accommodate the Defendants' asserted safety and security need for the ballroom itself or other temporary measures to secure the safety and security of the White House, the President, staff, and visitors while this appeal proceeds. We thus remand these cases to the district court with instructions to promptly address the pending motion to clarify how the injunction and its exception will ensure safety and security pending litigation. The district court's previously entered Page 4 USCA Case #26-5101 Document #2168165 Filed: 04/11/2026 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Page 5 of 17 No. 26-5101 September Term, 2025 stay of its preliminary injunction is hereby extended to April 17th to allow Defendants, if they wish, to seek Supreme Court review of this order remanding for factual development and clarification. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for a stay be dismissed as moot. Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith to the district court. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk BY: Is/ Amy Yacisin Deputy Clerk

The headlines about the DC Circuit ballroom order are misleading.

The order does extend a stay of the injunction—which, in English, means they can proceed for now. But, that misses the point: The 2-1 ruling sends the case back to Judge Leon to clarify the scope of the order—and then implement it.

A photo you might need to consult about now. FLOTUS / POTUS w Amanda Ungaro & Paolo Zampoli, who were guests of honor at their table, 1st inauguration