No. It was an opinion piece. They don't get paid. That's how that works. He's promoting an upcoming book.

Says the Yale law and history professor.
So we go after those who are older, worked and have "things" while Elon Musk was able to increase his wealth by $700 million A DAY in '25.
While the President of the United States increased his wealth by $3 BILLION in '25.
Good luck with your book dude.

This is what's interesting. All he needed to say was "Yes. He lost the election." And then tell Daddy later that he didn't really mean it and would be a good "sock puppet."
But anyone in that orbit doesn't even have the stones for that.

"I have this new website where if you want to actually measure your mental load, you can take a free assessment."
"Mental health" SELLS.
Because so many want to feel "special." Or have enemies. Or things to blame. Toss in gender? "We" lap it up like dogs.
Can't say "suck it up" anymore.
Too bad.

I think you're right. And nothing like pulling in hurting veterans to grease the wheels.

YOU, and those like you, are why we have Trump. It's nothing but fee fees and being part of a little team. There's no maturity. No insight. Just headlines and screaming.
I'll support whichever Democrat has the best chance of winning. You won't. Because it's allll about you, right?
Fuck that.

Perfect. Now you're just repeating what the other little revolutionaries have latched on to. And billions? Grow up.
You don't give a fuck about private prisons kid. And you CLEARLY don't know the story behind Steyer's involvement. Or why he got out of them and the business.
It's just faux-outrage.

So you're younger? Katie Porter or nothing? The promise of magic wands and defeating "enemies" is the lane? OK. That's why there's a good chance Democrats will lose the state. The 'revolutionaries" would prefer to die on a hill to be seen and lose than do what's best for others and win. We'll see.

Or maybe they really like Tom Steyer? Hell, Jane Fonda came out and endorsed him yesterday too.
And a lot of people don't like Katie Porter. Meaning those in California politics who work with her. That matters as far as getting things done.

You're right. I've done ibogaine. Not for addiction but because the opportunity presented itself. From my understanding iboga is much safer. No one should do ibogaine without being monitored and screened. That's why those using it for drug addiction is dicey. Their bodies are already compromised.

What if I told you the progressive organization started by Bernie Sanders, "Our Revolution," just today publicly endorsed Tom Steyer for Governor.

What do you think about that?

I despise that man but what did you EXPECT him to say about this situation? Seriously. What would you have preferred in the immediate aftermath?
I don't think you even know what he said. I think it's one of those social media things. Just parroting. Why do that? 8 kids are dead. Think about that.

Nah. You didn't read the article. Because what you were whining about was COVERED in that article.
Or maybe your comprehension needs a little work.
Take your own advice. Stop bothering me.

Well, it's only banned in a handful of countries, right? It's unregulated or legal for therapies in others.

I agree. Although he's been making a little noise lately. I think some of the Swalwell people went his way.
Villaraigosa and Mahan have no legitimate shot and are just running to increase their profiles. They need to go. And they will eventually.

OK. This one included what you were mentioning.

My personal belief is that anyone who needs to go a "retreat" probably shouldn't be doing hallucinogens.

And that's a block. No interest in your kind. It is what it is.

Yeah little revolutionary. I do think he's doing a good job. So do the vast majority of Californians. But you wouldn't know about that.
I try to not despise much but I despise weakness and screaming children demanding magic wands. I lose because of that. We all do.
So that'll be a block.

You don't live in California, do you?
If I looked at your posts I'd see nothing because raging against the machine, huh? Online and anonymously.
Have fun with that. That's ALL about you.

Ibogaine/Noribogaine in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature - PubMed The results show some efficacy of ibogaine in the treatment of SUDs, but its cardiotoxicity and mortality are worrying. Further studies are needed to assess its therapeutic efficacy and actual safety.

Are you serious?
I think you're just jacking yourself off now buddy.
But here. I'll play along. Won't matter though. Whatever.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36263479/

OK. I still think he'd be something. You know, he is the Governor of the most powerful state in the country. Personally, I find the social media response to be bullshit. But I'm not 20 something who just wants to yell and "own" others. I'm a grown up. Thankfully, so is he.

It'll clarify shortly. Betty Yee just dropped out today. And I would like to think that those who have no chance would step aside given the fact that they don't want Republican leadership either.

Patel? Gone.
Lutnick? Gone.
Gabbard? Gone.
And I could see RFK and Oz being shown the door before long too.

OK. As long as you know that "Bateman" has nothing to do with this account. It's clearly run by young social media kids tasked with a specific job.

I think you're right. It's about purposeful chaos. More chaos means that legitimate accusations get swept under the rug. This was a big story around his hearing for the position. And then we all move on because there's something equally outrageous around the corner.

Why didn't you read the article?

The ibogaine genie is out of the bottle. So why wouldn't we want more research to develop safer protocols? Most all of the 30 deaths over 30 years was around giving an extremely addicted, unhealthy person an extremely intense drug in a non-conducive environment. We should want focused review.

There's really interesting work being done around mosquito control. Deadliest animal in the world so it makes sense. Only females bite and it's just small percentage of the species that carries disease. My understanding is those that do could be eradicated with minimal to no impact on the food chain

I hope people at least know enough to check when it was written. They put this out as if it just happened. I don't get that.