Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Erica York

if you look into a mirror and chant “Ron Vara” three times you will suddenly assume the identity that imports subtract from GDP

1 year ago 12 0 1 1

No, this is before retaliation. We also caveat that we don’t incorporate the additional economic costs of trade policy uncertainty or broader harms of starting a global trade war.

1 year ago 6 0 0 0

No, tariffs wouldn’t have a positive effect, and I’d hesitate to call this minimal. Measured as economic harm per dollar of revenue raised, tariffs are a very inefficient tax. Currency appreciation doesn’t make tariffs free, it shifts who bears the burden from importers to exporters.

1 year ago 3 0 0 0
Post image

We’ve estimated the long-run economic impact of Trump’s new tariff ideas—a GDP hit of 0.4%.

1 year ago 23 11 6 2
Post image

the Word is being used in government policy! wild!

1 year ago 139 5 11 1

Tariffs are a tax increase that reduce after-tax incomes.

Whether they have an impact on the consumer price level depends on whether the Fed loosens monetary policy to accommodate the short-term transition to the new equilibrium with tariffs.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Yeah, they also happen to be our three largest export markets. Exporters will feel the pain even before considering potential retaliation.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Donald Trump says he will hit China, Canada and Mexico with new tariffs www.ft.com/content/8b98...

1 year ago 5 1 1 0
Post image

This is true of the other place, at least

1 year ago 23 3 0 0
Advertisement

Thanks!

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

It’ll be hard to persuade people that higher tariffs (aka import taxes) for other tax cuts is a good trade because it is actually a bad trade.

1 year ago 11 3 0 0