George made claims then made zero citations, then said the people that disagreed were doing it on vibes, not facts.

The article uses “unc” in the abstract and photo caption but doesn't say wh it means until the second to last paragraph. :-/ I skipped ahead using the search function.

My opinion is If you don’t want to write it, I don’t want to read it.

nan as in not a number? Or the mother of the (white) house?

"For those unaware"

Meaning those that aren't terminally online paying attention to SpaceX's trail of bread crumbs.

So much to unpack, but the expression "can of worms" comes to mind so best to leave it alone.

Okay, I will preface this with the GIGANTIC disclaimer that I promise I know how this looks, and I *swear* this is not personally motivated: If you have an old #LiveJournal account, and it has things you still care about in it, download it or import it to Dreamwidth SOON. Details:

Dubairates of the Carribean

Making a job needlessly difficult for an employee to induce them to quit is called a "constructed firing" or something along that line. The fault is totally on the employer in that instance.

This is all speculation on my part but I wouldn't be surprised if this happens.

His recent comments about hoping she'll "see the light" and convert make it seem like he's trying to repel Usha into divorcing him so it looks like he isn't divorcing her, despite the fact that it looks like he's trying to make the marriage difficult for her in order to make that happen.

Notably the one in the Republic of Condo

Use the passage that says Christians shouldn't marry unbelievers and read it as they shouldn't stay married to unbelievers.

It looks like a blown-up Sackboy from Little Big Planet

I don't think Christian Nationalists get exposed to real facts in their circles, whatever they do find runs off like water off a duck.

I guess that depends on which side you were on.

A SAFE HOUSE that's a GLASS STOREFRONT

My guess is they don't want to accidentally rub shoulders with the poors.

It’s been a while for me but back then, It was as easy to exclude specific countries as it is to make this goofy country specific shipping rate.

Lazy tech bro slanders discerning listeners

The brand name was confusing. I couldn’t tell if that was two words or bad kerning. It’s nice to see the web site to confirm it’s two words.

I didn’t notice the typo until just now. 🤦‍♂️

Does your heat pump have a loop that goes into the ground?

It was a grammatical mistake that one person made, knowing the context of the thread would be key to realizing that.

I just realized you're missing the context of this thread when focusing on that phrase.

This person's therapy involves pure oxygen in the hyperbaric chamber, at least going by the FAQ on their own site.

I get it but my point is the system is clumsy enough that it has to wake up half the state to tell them about a missing child that they couldn't possibly help.

They woke everyone up across my state with an Amber Alert at 2 AM. I’m pretty sure I didn’t see the child or kidnapper in my sleep, but do go off.

"33 is too young to mayor" sounds like takes from people that might as well be pro-gerontocracy.

The previous glasses had Milhouse Van Houten look to them and Zuck tried to pretend they were cool.

Only leaking one side raises eyebrows for me. To me selectively leaking a conversation means someone likely wants to push something in a way that might not be supported by the broader conversation.