📣 I'm excited to share our latest preprint!
We adapt and characterise a neurosphere-based CNCC differentiation protocol, and demonstrate utility for quantitative phenotyping and craniofacial disease modelling! 🧫
Read about Array-CNCC here:
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
@uoe-igc.bsky.social
Posts by Gerry Brien
We're also super excited to point you towards a wonderful, highly complimentary study from our colleagues Ana Banito and @nsbenab.bsky.social
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Take home points:
📌 SS18-SSX drives transcription largely independent of SWI/SNF
📌 P300 is an essential co-factor for fusion protein binding and activity
📌 Dual p300 and SWI/SNF targeting offers a mechanistically grounded therapeutic strategy.
Preprint - www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Combining degraders targeting p300 and SWI/SNF:
🧬 Strong synergy in SS18–SSX–positive cells
🧬 Profound loss of SS18–SSX chromatin binding
🧬 Broad collapse of oncogenic gene expression
🧬 Dramatic loss of cell viability
SWI/SNF and p300 impact different subsets of SS18-SSX binding sites
This gave us an idea...
👉 What if we therapeutically target both?
To recap:
Remove SWI/SNF ➡️ Modest effects on SS18-SSX binding
Remove p300 ➡️ Major loss of SS18-SSX occupancy and transcription
❗ P300, not SWI/SNF, sustains the oncogenic program
We found that p300 is physically and functionally coupled to SS18-SSX
🧬 Co-localises with SS18-SSX on chromatin
🧬 Supports SS18-SSX binding at target sites
🧬 Required for SS18-SSX driven transcription
➡️ Remove p300 and SS18-SSX falls of chromatin
So, what is the engine?
️A focused CRISPR screen revealed a striking dependency on p300
🧬 Not its paralog CBP
🧬 Specific to SS18-SSX positive sarcoma lines
Even when SWI/SNF activity is broadly eliminated:
🧬 Oncogenic transcription does not shut down
🧬 SS18-SSX transcriptional activity persists
➡️ Conclusion: SWI/SNF is not the main engine of SS18-SSX driven transcription
We used degraders to dismantle SWI/SNF complexes entirely, including SS18-SSX containing assemblies.
Result:
🧬 SWI/SNF complexes collapse
🧬 SS18-SSX stays bound at many target loci
🧬 Gene expression stays largely intact
Clinical efforts to target SWI/SNF (e.g. BRD9 degraders, based on our previous discoveries) have shown limited and transient benefits in synovial sarcoma patients.
So, we asked a simple question:
👉 Does SS18-SSX actually need SWI/SNF to drive oncogenic transcription?
Synovial sarcoma is driven almost exclusively by a single oncofusion – SS18-SSX
For years, the assumptions on disease mechanisms were simple:
➡️ SS18-SSX works by hijacking SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling activity
Our new study shows that assumption was wrong 🧵👇
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Just a few days after international DMG/DIPG day, our paper showing the importance of CBX4/PCGF4 containing cPRC1 complexes in glioma is out in @cp-molcell.bsky.social. Below is a nice synopsis of the paper by joint first author @EimearLagan.bsky.social
Excited to share our new paper out today in @cp-molcell.bsky.social! We show that the H3K27M oncohistone rewires cPRC1, creating a unique dependency on CBX4/PCGF4-containing complexes, and also reveal a previously unknown function of CBX4. Highlights below (1/11).