Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by David S. Cohen

The evil women leave. The evil men stay.

15 hours ago 15 1 3 0

The Trump administration's actions against trans people have always been illegal. Great to see courts agreeing.

18 hours ago 11 1 0 0

This is a big deal! So happy for @womenslawproject.bsky.social, @dsc250.bsky.social, PA abortion providers, and all the people across the commonwealth of Pennsylvania who may benefit for this ruling!

19 hours ago 10 5 1 0
Infowars/Onion combo logo in rainbow saying “I support the onion’s hostile media takeover.”

Infowars/Onion combo logo in rainbow saying “I support the onion’s hostile media takeover.”

It’s finally happened. After 18 months. Finally, a media merger you can root for.

19 hours ago 21329 4090 137 131

According to the concurrence, the right has existed in PA since 1701!!

20 hours ago 6 0 0 0

Sure are! What a juxtaposition from the US Supremes....

21 hours ago 3 0 1 0

And I should say - this case was brought by @womenslawproject.bsky.social, Troutman Pepper, and me. We started working on it in 2017 and filed it in 2019.

Justice through civil litigation can take a looong time (too long). But victory is sweet nonetheless!

21 hours ago 21 1 3 0
Advertisement

3) Even if there is no fundamental right, the Medicaid ban fails rational basis review because it is irrational to force someone to carry a pregnancy to term because they don't have the money to pay for an abortion.

Big wins all around!! /end

21 hours ago 22 2 1 0

2) The PA constitution protects a fundamental right to reproductive autonomy (sorry Sam Alito!). The Medicaid ban fails strict scrutiny on this point too. /3

21 hours ago 25 1 1 1

Three big points in the incredible opinion:

1) The ban on Medicaid funding for abortion is sex discrimination. Thus, it's subject to a particular form of strict scrutiny. The state has no compelling interest and, even if it did, this ban is not the least restrictive means to those ends. /2

21 hours ago 23 1 1 0

A case we started working on in 2017 and filed in 2019!

21 hours ago 6 0 1 0

This is incredible!! So proud to be the chair of the board Women's Law Project, which has been litigating this case for nearly a decade!! This win took so much perseverance, resilience, and creativity. Congrats to @dsc250.bsky.social & @womenslawproject.bsky.social!!!

21 hours ago 24 6 1 1

South Jessup, looking north - between Lombard and Pine, 11th and 12th.

23 hours ago 3 0 1 0
Post image

Big abortion win in PA today - the ban on Medicaid funding is unconstitutional!

AND there's a fundamental right to abortion!

We won!

(Though this Commonwealth Court opinion can be appealed - we'll see what our AG does.)

23 hours ago 1292 318 16 18

Wash West - South Jessup St off Lombard, between 11th and 12th (looking north).

1 day ago 2 0 1 0
Post image

Spring in Philadelphia.

1 day ago 5962 414 87 22
Advertisement

These are all the questions in Trivial Pursuit that I never knew. And I'm totally fine with that.

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

This is why a slogan like MAGA appeals to many.

1 day ago 5 1 0 0

I’m on the left and involved in a lot of left spaces. The only time I hear “justice involved population” is when Andy Beshear complains about the term.

2 days ago 23 2 1 0
Preview
a black and white photo of two men with the caption i 'm shocked shocked to find that gambling is going on ALT: a black and white photo of two men with the caption i 'm shocked shocked to find that gambling is going on
2 days ago 4 0 0 0
Post image

So wait, you’re telling me the Justices react differently to Presidential power based on whether they like the President politically?!? No way!!

2 days ago 32 8 1 2

Or maybe it’s Rorschach’s Strait?

2 days ago 6 0 1 0

Schroedinger’s Strait

3 days ago 20 2 1 0

So in touch with ordinary America.

4 days ago 17 5 1 1

"Mayor Mamdani has proven in 100 days of bold, principled, people-powered governance that every politician in America who has ever used the word “realistic” as an excuse for timidity, has lied to us. And as Americans, we are done waiting. "

4 days ago 157 51 1 1
Preview
ICE Agent Charged With Assault in Rare State Prosecution

Go get 'em!

4 days ago 9 2 0 0
Advertisement

We have had many conversations about this possibility in our household. So upsetting it's found to be the case.

5 days ago 4 3 0 0

I mean, those are exceptions to all doctrines, right?

5 days ago 3 0 1 0

But obviously I missed the footnote to that opinion that it only applies when the disagreement is with DEMOCRATIC policies, not when it's with REPUBLICAN policies. Silly me.

5 days ago 54 1 2 0

I seem to recall some Supreme Court precedent saying you can't cancel contracts with a religious entity because of disagreement with religious principles. Something that like Schmulton v. Schmity of Schmiladelphia.

5 days ago 526 150 15 3