That is a much more interesting question, though I am not sure I agree with the premise!

blog.dividedargument.com/p/the-non-sc...

January 2019 — AALS!

Backup backup backup backup argument | Divided Argument We recap and reflect on the oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara (the birthright citizenship case) and then analyze the Court's recent decision in Chiles v. Salazar, about the First Amendment limits on ...

dividedargument.com/episodes/bac...

A Scholarly Roundtable on History and Practice A discussion with Christian Burset, Jonathan Green, and Ryan Snyder

blog.dividedargument.com/p/a-scholarl...

It may be a new world, but it’s the same Constitution.

The Jerome Hall Lecture featuring William Baude YouTube video by IU Maurer

Beyond Tit-For-Tat, my Jerome Hall lecture www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOfj...

The Jerome Hall Lecture featuring William Baude Beyond Tit-for-Tat One of the most widespread constitutional problems today is that our constitutional norms are one-sided. We try to follow im...

We're excited to host Prof. @williambaude.bsky.social tomorrow for the Jerome Hall Law Lecture. His presentation, "Beyond Tit-for-Tat," will begin at 12 p.m. Eastern and will be livestreamed. Register to attend via Zoom: events.iu.edu/lawiub/event...

I didn’t know whether you aware of this body of literature and find it incorrect or irrelevant, or didn’t know about it, hence the brief initial reply.

There are too many relevant papers to link easily, but here are two:

chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcont...

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

I won’t speak for Sai, but on my view, what interpretive principles we should use are governed by law; and for the Constitution specifically, our law of interpretation is the founders law of interpretation, plus any lawful changes to that law since then.

The Law of Interpretation

Supreme Court Stays to State Courts a few thoughts on the relationship of 28 U.S.C. 1257 and 28 U.S.C. 1651(a)

blog.dividedargument.com/p/supreme-co...

For the Fun of the Surf In northwest Indiana, there’s a 20-mile stretch of Lake Michigan that’s dominated by industry. It’s some of the dirtiest water in the lake, but it's also home to some of the biggest waves anywhere on ...

“Chicago is a beach town.”

www.interlochenpublicradio.org/podcast/poin...

blog.dividedargument.com/p/the-americ...

When Extremism Becomes Moderation A Comment on Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh

Co-post with @williambaude.bsky.social
blog.dividedargument.com/p/when-extre...

I’ve posted a short piece for lay readers on Youngstown papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

New Episode: "Betty Boop or Shakespeare" In the latest episode of the podcast, we dig into the tariffs decision.

blog.dividedargument.com/p/new-episod...

Yes

Call for papers!

www.law.uchicago.edu/form/uchicag...

www.law.uchicago.edu/news/does-un...

‘The Justices Might Actually Have to Say No, Even to the President’ www.nytimes.com/2026/01/22/o...

I generally agree with this, but I also wonder how much of a convention it actually is. I'd guess that maybe 30-40% of my articles have had a "Part IV" in this sense, and that most or all of my most-cited pieces don't (and to the extent they do, that's not what they're cited for).

1, Im not sure, but 2, shouldn’t it be the state law of interpretation?

Things to Read This Week (1/19) Election Law, Shugerman, ACX

blog.dividedargument.com/p/things-to-...

Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation In August 2018, Cedric Galette sustained injuries when his stopped vehicle was struck by a New Jerse...

In 15 minutes:

fedsoc.org/events/court...

Why Stop at Level Three? discretion to pose the question in Trump v. Illinois and elsewhere

blog.dividedargument.com/p/why-stop-a...

Big and good news for the Constitutional Law Institute. Thanks to Deb Cafaro!

Are those all pre-Grzegorczyk?