Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Security Dilemmas

Preview
Trump Is Said to Be in Talks to Send Afghans Who Aided U.S. Forces to Congo

This is so heinous, I do not know what to say. This shit devastates me.

Trump Is Said to Be in Talks to Send Afghans Who Aided U.S. Forces to Congo www.nytimes.com/2026/04/21/w...

14 hours ago 626 266 42 45

Hope is a form of resistance.

-- Aziz Abu Sarah

2 days ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
U.S. REPUDIATES A HARD-LINE AIDE (Published 1981)

There was also the time Eugene Rostow testified to Congress that the U.S. could survive ten million fatalities. And this comment by Richard Pipes in 1981:

3 days ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

From the New York Times:

3 days ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Why Xi Is Kneecapping His Own Top Men Targeting the inner circle of leadership shows no one is safe.

The similarities between the leaders of the world's two most powerful countries is striking.

5 days ago 0 0 0 0

Bush was far from the only person in the Reagan administration who believed that. Fortunately, Reagan himself didn't, though that wasn't obvious in his first few years in office.

5 days ago 1 0 1 0
Page 29 of "With Enough Shovels," where Scheer (during the 1980 presidential election) asks Bush (in a tape-recorded interview). Key quotes are highlighted on the page:

"'Don't you reach a point with these strategic weapons where we can wipe each other out so many times and no one wants to use them or be willing to use them, that it really doesn't matter whether you're ten percent or two percent lower or higher?'

Bush bristled a bit and replied, 'Yes, if you believe there is no such thing as a winner in a nuclear exchange, that argument makes a little sense. I don't believe that.'

I then asked, 'How do you win in a nuclear exchange?'

Bush seemed angry that I had challenged him to what was apparently an obvious truth. He replied, 'You have a surviability of command and control, survivability of industrial potential, protection of a percentage of your citizens, and you have a capability that inflicts more damage on the opposition than it can inflict on you. That's the way you can have a winner, and the Soviets' planning is based on the ugly concept of a winner in a nuclear exchange.'

'Do you mean,' I asked, 'five percent would survive? Two percent?'

'More than that,' Bush answered. 'If everybody fired everything he had, you'd have more than that survive.'"

Page 29 of "With Enough Shovels," where Scheer (during the 1980 presidential election) asks Bush (in a tape-recorded interview). Key quotes are highlighted on the page: "'Don't you reach a point with these strategic weapons where we can wipe each other out so many times and no one wants to use them or be willing to use them, that it really doesn't matter whether you're ten percent or two percent lower or higher?' Bush bristled a bit and replied, 'Yes, if you believe there is no such thing as a winner in a nuclear exchange, that argument makes a little sense. I don't believe that.' I then asked, 'How do you win in a nuclear exchange?' Bush seemed angry that I had challenged him to what was apparently an obvious truth. He replied, 'You have a surviability of command and control, survivability of industrial potential, protection of a percentage of your citizens, and you have a capability that inflicts more damage on the opposition than it can inflict on you. That's the way you can have a winner, and the Soviets' planning is based on the ugly concept of a winner in a nuclear exchange.' 'Do you mean,' I asked, 'five percent would survive? Two percent?' 'More than that,' Bush answered. 'If everybody fired everything he had, you'd have more than that survive.'"

The cover of the first paperback edition of Robert Scheer's book "With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush and Nuclear War" (originally published in 1982 and updated in 1983). The words are in large white letters over a red background. Short blurbs from New York Times columnist Anthony Lewis and former Secretary of State Cyrus Vance appear at the bottom.

The cover of the first paperback edition of Robert Scheer's book "With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush and Nuclear War" (originally published in 1982 and updated in 1983). The words are in large white letters over a red background. Short blurbs from New York Times columnist Anthony Lewis and former Secretary of State Cyrus Vance appear at the bottom.

Vice President George H.W. Bush's official color portrait. He is wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a patterned tie. An American flag and the vice presidential flag (both on stands) are partially visible behind him.

Vice President George H.W. Bush's official color portrait. He is wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a patterned tie. An American flag and the vice presidential flag (both on stands) are partially visible behind him.

Historical footnote: Vice President George H.W. Bush (a former director of the CIA, former ambassador to China, and former Member of Congress) really did believe it was possible to survive—and win—an all-out nuclear war, as he told then-Los Angeles Times reporter Robert Scheer on January 24, 1980.

5 days ago 14 3 2 0
Advertisement
Post image

Just completely unhinged and untethered to reality.

6 days ago 0 0 0 0

I wonder if the fraction of bombs dropped that were incendiary was comparable for both cities, or if it was higher for the bombing campaign against Japan.

1 week ago 3 0 1 0
Preview
a man and a woman are jumping in the air in a hallway with their hands in the air . ALT: a man and a woman are jumping in the air in a hallway with their hands in the air .

Orbán out!

1 week ago 1 0 0 0

Also, in a true democracy no party needs to win the vote by a supermajority to get control of government. No one should be complacent about the uneven playing field of competitive authoritarianism.

1 week ago 258 36 0 0

The negotiations were short because they weren’t real negotiations. The talks were an opportunity for the US to demand things Iran has long rejected instead of finding compromise. That has been the Trump regime’s whole approach to Iran and it’s why the war continues.

1 week ago 14 2 0 0
Preview
Pope says ‘enough of war’ and decries ‘delusion of omnipotence’ at peace vigil Leo’s comments did not directly mention war in Iran but read as his strongest condemnation of the conflict yet

The phrase "delusion of omnipotence" is insightful. Conservatives in the U.S. have long conflated the notion that the U.S. is the most powerful country in the world, which it is, with the idea that it is all powerful, which it is not. This is a phenomenon that pre-dates the Trump era.

1 week ago 0 0 0 0

My biggest fear right now is that Trump will try to resolve the Iran situation with a nuclear weapon. It's hard to know how high the risk of this happening is, but it's not zero.

1 week ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Trump again with the card game metaphor. Something tells me he's really bad at poker.

1 week ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
After pager attack on Hezbollah, Hungary offered help to Iran Revelations about a 2024 call offering assistance raise questions about Hungary’s ties to Iran as the Trump administration backs Prime Minister Viktor Orban for reelection.
1 week ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

🔥🔥🔥

2 weeks ago 5 1 0 0

Can't you just be happy about the national championship?

2 weeks ago 1 0 1 0
Preview
two stormtroopers standing next to each other with the words " nothing to see here move along " ALT: two stormtroopers standing next to each other with the words " nothing to see here move along "

Firing the Army chief of staff in the middle of a military conflict is perfectly normal. Happens all the time. Nothing to see here. Move along.

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0

You have to laugh because the alternative is contemplating that we, as a country (I mean, I voted for the qualified Black lady), engaged in an act of world historic irresponsibility, the suffering of which will be born by millions of people worldwide, but will stain our very souls nonetheless.

2 weeks ago 434 47 3 4

“It will just open up naturally,” Trump says about the Strait of Hormuz. He also once said, at the beginning of the pandemic, that COVID would end by itself. "One day — it’s like a miracle — it will disappear"

2 weeks ago 4973 1178 204 74

Trump's right that the world is watching.

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Sad news about my old SAIS professor Tom Keaney. Taught my class on the American Military.

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Go Artemis!

2 weeks ago 0 1 0 0

PEPFAR was one of the greatest American accomplishments of the last 50 years. It saved lives at home and abroad and represented the very best of this country: the compassion, the expertise, the dedication to a greater good. It did us proud.

Its willful destruction is both criminal and immoral.

2 weeks ago 34 14 2 0
Post image

Nothing says we will always have the backs of our warfighters™️ quite like undermining the chain of command.

3 weeks ago 407 66 16 7
Post image

From today's New York Times:

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Needless to say, Trump's behavior toward nations that have been U.S. allies for the last 80 years is severely harmful to our national interests. But no one forced Trump on the American people. He is who the voters chose in 2024.

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0

Exactly my point. It's difficult to deter an idiot, which Trump is.

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0

The administration simply declaring victory (again) and ceasing hostilities would by no means be the worst COA.

Trump has created a mess and has no great options for fixing it.

But some of those options—committing war crimes, sending in ground troops, etc—are definitely worse than others.

3 weeks ago 90 29 9 5
Advertisement