If you think of it, it was essentially a hotel in function – visitors arrive, do their activities, leave, the premises get cleaned up for the next visitors. And since we now know a major purpose of it to be shooting compromising video, any unnecessary background detail was probably only distracting
"Superior" in this case meaning lighter, meaning a greater amount of them can be carried by the soldier. While the larger caliber, heavier bullets of the original AK meant better and surer penetration in the Vietnamese jungle – thus the preference.
Might've been a group effort. "Congressman/woman/camera/tv" tetrachotomy suggests trump's at least partial. involvement
Uhh.. a cup is a toroid, bowls and glasses are spheres.
You're the one functionally illiterate in applying them.
I'm more or less pointing out, publicly owned productive assets are indeed a feature of socialism and the Constitution has a very interesting related provision in it. Aside from the inherently socialistic idea of a govt answerable to public
They weren't capitalists by conventional definition, I can tell you that much.
Instead of obsessing over labels, think about how the Constitution from very outset includes a provision for a govt-owned information and communications technology infrastructure.
I am proposing a forward-minded argumentation framework.
Besides, powers of plutocracy hate programs owned by a democratic i.e. accountable to people government precisely for the reason that they erode unaccountable private power.
Well, anyways, Post Office – in other words, socialist IT, is firmly in the Constitution
Nah, Mamdani's great, bro. A natural diplomat.
If this is what it takes to keep NY safe – and it clearly is exactly what it takes – I'll take it
Great observation.
They also have a distinct lack of mental acuity. That kinda pops out at the reader first thing.
Purposefully wastefully. An insolvent govt has less ability to put up resistance to oligarchic encroachment.
Also, public paying – lavishly – for a paramilitary with a sole mission of making war on the public.
Not "Jucita". Jucika, like Jessica.
Also also where most people would use screws for this task – just about ever since power tools have become widely available.
Impressively layered incompetency at a basic stereotypically "manly" activity from that manospherian.
I view it as a war on productive centers of American economy. The goal being to frighten consumers and depress spending.
Carney went there, didn't he? Looks like he might already be on it.
Whoever didn't sink in too much to just bail bailed. Makes perfect sense – unstable chaotic environment with no clear rules.
Would argue that "pop star" is more of a marketing phenomenon than anything that has to do with artistry or creativity or anything like that.
There has never been a time when top charting pop has not sucked. Wrong place to look for music worth hearing.
–"Happy Holiday, peasant scum!"
Put simply, aside from aesthetics, there's actually no difference between magaists and so called "regular Republicans", Dem leadershp always likes to bring up as some sort of antithesis. Never were good, nothing what they said was ever in earnest.
Return on investment wise it's already not there. Let everything collapse, scoop up assets at fire sale price, keep own cash reserves in the blue states would be the strategy.
Nothing beyond symbolic singular display of pseudo-charity will take place.
For how long will that fountain of generosity last, though? In the best of cases it will be a once-twice type event – if at all.
They mean "some people", not "all people".
Ok, we've officially reached Russia level
youtube.com/shorts/N1mmf...
For sure, for sure. The more complacency now, the harsher the consequences later.
Supreme Court is compromised. What's even the point of bringing it up other than to point out its illegitimacy?
But then again, the Project 2025 attack is an attack on the US legal system as a whole, so it stands to reason their toadie court would aid in that attack...
As if women and minorities enjoyed a better deal under monarchy. Don't get carried away to the point of ahistoricity.
Basic responsibility dictates he should've rushed to get the tattoo removed as soon as those Republican nazi chats hit the news, not waited till his issue comes up.
Him doing nothing about it, intentional or not,has effect in normalizing nazi discourse in our politics via downplaying its seriousness
Notice how you can't give a straight answer to a request to clarify own prior statement for fear of looking ridiculous.
That should tell you something about the strength of your positions.
Very odd methodology, considering mRNA vax etc is only looked at under such a magnyfying glass because of its politicization, which, in turn, is due to politicization of the Covid response in the US—reasons for which have nothing to do with healthcare in the first place.