I read your article. You called them a para military force. But I would commend to your attention to the analysis from Mitchell v Henderson

ICE aren’t soldiers

At least in the second circuit

(I mean, realistically this is a fifth amendment due process issue)

It’s a fifth amendment issue, because we aren’t dealing with actual soldiers

Thank you for coming to my TED talk

It’s actually a fifth amendment issue. ICE isn’t the military.
ÞALA is here to answer any questions you may have

Actually, you’re thinking of the Fifth Amendment. ICE isn’t the military.

All day everyday

This was an underappreciated post

Los Maduros son tostones

K-Cup Coffee Hunters

Other than a typo we didn’t catch until after filing, of course, I’m pleased to have assisted

Probably not. The civilian cabinet member is not a soldier.

I’m sorry, did you say something

I’m horrified

Not troops though

My conspiracy theory: the ballroom is a cover story.

The east wing actually covers the emergency operations center (bunker) and it needs to be redone to resist modern bunker buster weaponry and it’s likely being expanded in the process.

Not where I would have gone with it

I’m ready

So a 3A violation should be enforceable through state trespass law

The problem with Bivens is that it established a federal tort rather than recognising that 4A enshrined immunity from state tort claims only if you had a warrant. That’s the function of a warrant. Confected federal immunity wasn’t something the founders intended.

It’s always 3A time. The most successful constitutional amendment we’ve had.

There really needs to be a way to get smackdowns on judges who say the stupidest things but it turns out it’s not prejudicial for you because you win on other grounds so there’s no appeal

Pouring one out for Kimmel

ABC should replace Kimmel with Matt Damon

So i finally got to share a stage with @nationalsecuritylaw.org

Gorram antifa

You’re seriously blaming Trump for this? Oh come on

Get me a client