yeees, need to fill this. finally something to show off multiple gender identities~

snow fox, front view

snow fox, side view

snow fox, back view

snow fox, viewed from above

snow day~

meowing into the void

the one thing that would make odyssey worth buying, walking around in your ship.
bonus point if you can do so while hyper cruising to a station in a binary star system

nice art~

I know the others, but I can't find what Φ represents, got any tips?

boosting explosive power and bracing to turn handguns into anti tank ammo owo

orange cow with a witch outfit

got my badge picture ready for flüüfff ~

hello there fellow blond haired brown cow with a ponytail and green overalls~
don't mind me, just taking notes on how you do your cow muzzle and stuff owo

it's been a while since I last played and I didn't finish the game, think I was stuck in deepnest iirc, so it might be people who didn't go far enough to see all his interactions, or I'm misremembering things

to me he felt more like a hiking buddy, who you only meet randomly on the trails as he's taking a rest, someone who you can relate with as you explore wondrous lands.

and I can see how that could be interpreted as a "are you winning son" dad or a cool uncle for some people

Commission for @snuggly-ghost.bsky.social ! ^^

how does underage work for fantasy races ?
at what point does furry count as realistic animal ?
how to define consent when discussing powerplay?

without these written in the rules, doing anything lewd with Lord of the rings, argonian maids, or my little pony is a risk of getting banned.

a clear rule is fair, tho most artists came here specifically because it was a safe space.
with a vague rule, gotta hope the moderator who sees your posts like your face

if we can show opposition to the new guidelines it may give them pause before applying them, if we just wait for the bans to start, it's a sign we're okay with the rules as written

and for a community of millions, the moderation team is too big to check that each one is acting fairly.

up to the moderator, if they feel like it has enough educational value to overcome their personal taste in the situation being depicted

every piece of art can teach you something, about the world, or about yourself, but it's always subjective

Yakuza in diapers in a brightly colored nursery with the caption "Yakuza like a dragon" and "baby don't cry"

the nursery scene in Yakuza is harmful ?

how are these kinks harmful to people who make art of it, or want to watch at of it ?

if you don't want to watch art of it, there are content blocking tools already

it's not, they are writing a fiction, not their own personal experience, even if the story is influenced by their personal experience

if you have ideas on drawn kinks that are harmful to the artist or the people who want to see it i'd like to hear them so we can talk about something more specific

there's already rules against harassment

doing art of other people's character for the purpose of harassment shouldn't be put in the same basket as depicting your own character (or characters you have been given the right to portray for that purpose) in situations pertaining to your own fantasies

you may want to remove your repost for this post then bsky.app/profile/chim...

you do know you've done just that, right?

so you're okay with doing things that should at least temporarily ban you?

why should adults who enjoy unrealistic sexual fantasies have to compromise on their vision when making art of fictional characters?

who does that protect?

if you personally don't want to see it, bluesky has tools for that

so you reposting a post saying "RT to wish ill on jk Rowling" should get you banned?

so you're not allowed to have bratty characters, character role-playing, or any kind of power dynamic that might imply forced consent

try Rowling in the search bar and you'll see how badly applied banning people for wishing ill on her is

what of people who don't read alt text?

you asked for an example on how the new community guidelines are already being applied even though they only should start being enforced on October 15.

and with how selectively it's being applied for this case, it doesn't bring any reassurance on how bluesky will handle the rest of the new rules

bdsm contains a lot of roleplay of usually non-consensual acts (bondage, hypno, pred/prey, sado/maso, domination), these rules mark any fiction as non consensual acts, the only way currently to "make consent clear" is a "I consent" sticker (if that even work), otherwise it's up to the observer

these updated rules will officially take effect next month, but while they are effectively already being applied in some cases (see trans people being banned for wishing ill on jk Rowling), this will be publicly setting in stone the new way bluesky moderation handle things

a first draft of the updated rules was posted last month, the whole bluesky community sent lots of feedback asking for clarification then, following bluesky's demand for feedback. and after 14 000 feedbacks, they didn't clarify at all, they just changed the wording to say the same thing