Tyson settled. JBS settled. Both dropped “net-zero” claims. Track the next ones at earthjustice.org
Tyson settled. JBS settled. Both dropped “net-zero” claims. Track the next ones at earthjustice.org — search “greenwashing.” When a company makes a climate claim, check if they’ve been sued over it. The lawsuit filings are public. The settlement terms reveal what the company couldn’t defend.
The meat industry spent $200 million since 2000 lobbying against emissions rules. Go to opensecrets.
The meat industry spent $200 million since 2000 lobbying against emissions rules. Go to opensecrets.org. Search “livestock.” See which Congress members receive the most. Then check: did they vote for the agricultural exemption from methane regulation? Post the donation next to the vote.
Tyson told consumers its beef was “climate-smart.” Court found the claim “false or misleading.” Tyso
Tyson told consumers its beef was “climate-smart.” Court found the claim “false or misleading.” Tyson dropped it under settlement. If a tracker compared every company’s sustainability claim to whether it survived legal challenge — across food, auto, tech, welfare, housing — how many would stand?
Tyson’s “climate-smart beef”: sued, settled, dropped. JBS’s “net-zero”: sued, settled, dropped. If a
Tyson’s “climate-smart beef”: sued, settled, dropped. JBS’s “net-zero”: sued, settled, dropped. If a platform tracked every food company’s climate claim alongside its legal status — active, challenged, settled, or dropped — would you check your brands before trusting the label?
The Earthjustice complaint against Tyson is a public PDF. Search earthjustice.org for “Tyson.” Page
The Earthjustice complaint against Tyson is a public PDF. Search earthjustice.org for “Tyson.” Page 1: the claims. Page 12: the spending — less than 0.1% of revenue. Next time someone cites “climate-smart beef,” reply with the filing. The document is the counter-argument.
Go to airnow.gov. Enter your zip code. Look at your county’s AQI history — the trend over the last 5
Go to airnow.gov. Enter your zip code. Look at your county’s AQI history — the trend over the last 5 years. Bookmark it. Check it quarterly after the repeal takes effect. When emission regulations have no legal basis, your local air quality data is where the consequence shows up first.
The repeal is being challenged in the DC Circuit. 24 states + health orgs filed Feb–March 2026. Trac
The repeal is being challenged in the DC Circuit. 24 states + health orgs filed Feb–March 2026. Track at courtlistener.com — search “endangerment finding.” When briefing closes and oral arguments are set, the ruling timeline starts. This case sets precedent for all science-based regulation.
24 states joined the lawsuit against the endangerment finding repeal. Look up your state attorney ge
24 states joined the lawsuit against the endangerment finding repeal. Look up your state attorney general’s office. Did they join? The list: AZ, CO, CT, DE, HI, IL, ME, MD, MI, MN, NJ, NM, NV, NC, OR, RI, VT, VA, WA, WI + DC. If your state is not on it, your AG chose not to challenge it.
EDF published a tracker: “They used to fight for big polluters. Now they’re in charge of your health
EDF published a tracker: “They used to fight for big polluters. Now they’re in charge of your health.” Names, prior employers, current EPA roles. Environmental Integrity has the full list. Search “Who’s Running Trump’s EPA” at environmentalintegrity.org. Screenshot it. The names are public.
Nearly half of EPA’s political appointees have ties to industries they regulate. A third were fossil
Nearly half of EPA’s political appointees have ties to industries they regulate. A third were fossil fuel lobbyists. If a dashboard mapped every appointee’s prior employer, current role, and the overlap between what they lobbied for and what they now oversee — would you check it?
Go to opensecrets.org. Search your senator or rep. Check their oil and gas industry donations. Then
Go to opensecrets.org. Search your senator or rep. Check their oil and gas industry donations. Then go to scorecard.lcv.org and look up their environmental vote score. Post both numbers together. The correlation between fossil fuel money and anti-environment votes is peer-reviewed (PNAS, 2020).
The entire US climate regulatory framework rested on one administrative finding. If a public tracker
The entire US climate regulatory framework rested on one administrative finding. If a public tracker mapped every major regulatory framework to its foundational legal document — and showed how many rest on a single determination one appointee can reverse — which frameworks would you check first?
58,000 additional premature deaths. 37 million more asthma attacks. 18 billion tons of added emissio
58,000 additional premature deaths. 37 million more asthma attacks. 18 billion tons of added emissions. $170–$500 billion in health costs. These are peer-reviewed projections of what the endangerment finding repeal produces by 2055. The numbers are the evidence. The repeal is the cause.
EPA: “biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history.” National Academies of Sciences: the finding is “
EPA: “biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history.” National Academies of Sciences: the finding is “accurate and reinforced by even stronger evidence.” The agency that repealed the finding and the scientific body that reviewed it reached opposite conclusions about the same document.
Run a business that advertises on Google? Log into Google Ads. Pull your cost-per-click history over
Run a business that advertises on Google? Log into Google Ads. Pull your cost-per-click history over 5 years. Industry average doubled: $0.85 in 2015, $3.68 in 2024. Compare your growth rate to CPI inflation (2-3%). The gap between your ad costs and inflation is the monopoly premium.
The remedy for Google’s monopoly is being fought in the DC Circuit. Google appealed Jan 2026. DOJ cr
The remedy for Google’s monopoly is being fought in the DC Circuit. Google appealed Jan 2026. DOJ cross-appealed Feb 2026. Track the docket at courtlistener.com, case 1:20-cv-03010. When briefing deadlines pass and oral arguments are scheduled, that is when the remedy gets decided.
Open your iPhone. Settings → Apps → Safari → Search Engine. See “Google”? That placement cost $20 bi
Open your iPhone. Settings → Apps → Safari → Search Engine. See “Google”? That placement cost $20 billion. Change it to DuckDuckGo, Brave, or Bing for one week. If your search experience barely changes, the $20 billion was never about quality. It was about keeping you from looking.
Degoogle lists show app swaps. What they don’t show: which products are court-confirmed monopolies,
Degoogle lists show app swaps. What they don’t show: which products are court-confirmed monopolies, which have paid default deals, and what switching actually costs. If a dashboard scored your dependency on a company with two monopoly convictions — search and ad tech — what would yours be?
Apple told users Safari gives them “the best experience.” Under oath, Apple’s SVP said Google is the
Apple told users Safari gives them “the best experience.” Under oath, Apple’s SVP said Google is the default because it generates the most revenue. If a public tracker compared every tech company’s user-facing claims to their sworn testimony — would any “best for you” framing survive?
August 2024: a federal judge ruled Google illegally monopolized search. April 2025: a different fede
August 2024: a federal judge ruled Google illegally monopolized search. April 2025: a different federal judge ruled Google illegally monopolized ad tech. Two courts, two judges, two separate cases, same company. Both found Google used its dominance to overcharge and exclude competitors.
September 2, 2025: a federal judge ruled Google illegally maintained its search monopoly and ordered
September 2, 2025: a federal judge ruled Google illegally maintained its search monopoly and ordered remedies. Google’s stock rose 8% — adding $160 billion in market value. The market priced the antitrust penalty as a net positive for the monopolist.
Want to check any automaker? EPA keeps a public enforcement database at epa.gov/enforcement. Search
Want to check any automaker? EPA keeps a public enforcement database at epa.gov/enforcement. Search your manufacturer + “defeat device.” Cross-check with DOJ press releases for consent decrees. Cite the consent decree, not the press. Consent decrees are court-filed and citable.
Every diesel defeat device was caught the same way: independent researchers tested real-world emissi
Every diesel defeat device was caught the same way: independent researchers tested real-world emissions against lab certifications. The gap was 5–65x. ICCT runs these road tests annually. Check icct.org for the latest real-driving emissions data. When lab and road diverge, that is the signal.