Celebrating the sunshine finally emerging in Exeter with Another Sad Philosophy Workshop today!
Posts by Tom Roberts
Tom Roberts and Daisy Dixon review Dominic McIver Lopes’s “Aesthetic Injustice” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/738315 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy
AI chatbots are increasingly generating and spreading gossip, which can lead to reputational harm, anxiety, and social unrest as these outputs circulate widely and unchecked. doi.org/hbgmbz
Daisy Dixon and I have a friendly-critical review of Dominic Lopes’s *Aesthetic Injustice* out in the new issue of Ethics.
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...
Three AHRC PhD Scholarships available for Humanities subjects at Exeter, including Philosophy! February deadline, see link for details:
www.exeter.ac.uk/study/fundin...
If you are wondering what Labour plans to do to British universities, I wrote a piece for you! isrf.org/blog/labours...
It me!
Friends. Lovers. Therapists. Deathbots. AI is now fulfilling new roles for millions of us every single day. How are these new 'relationships' changing how we view technology - and each other?
Love Machines by James Muldoon is the first book on AI companions. Out January: linktr.ee/lovemachinesbook
m.youtube.com/watch?v=DgTK...
Thanks to Cardiff for funding our Sad Philosophy Workshop next week with me, @lopezcantero.bsky.social and @bexmillar.bsky.social
We’ll be in the melancholy domains of grief and negative relationships, heartbreak and chatbots, and ai psychosis 🖤 🖤🖤
A cover of the British Journal of Aesthetics, Volume 65, Number 3. A special issue on embodied voices: aesthetics and ethics of bodies in performance.
Embodied voices: an introduction Performing arts and affordances: moving toward poetic justice through embodied learning Is there anybody out there? “Her fresh voice”: representatively staging Puccini’s Turandot with Andrea Dworkin An artist’s voice: expressive achievement, experiential content, and authority
The swirl of emotion among us: affect, the voice, and performance training The beautiful voice in opera: the injustice of vocal discrimination Voice, rhyme, and aesthetic injustice
A list of reviews in the latest issue of the BJA.
This is a public service announcement. The BJA has published a brand new issue. That is all. academic.oup.com/bjaesthetics... #philsky
🎉 What a lovely way to celebrate my first day at Exeter! This fun conversation with Jim Baxter @ethicsuntangled.bsky.social about a paper my now-colleague @joelkrueger.com and I wrote on AI Gossip is now up!
In the podcast we discuss how AI systems might engage in gossip-like behaviour 🙊
Narrator: The answer was the secret fifth and sixth “E”, situatEdnEss.
Why was Newton so sure that if you just did his optical experiments you’d *have* to believe him about light? Kirsten Walsh, Tom Roberts and I use 4E cognition to suggest an answer. Anachronism? You be the judge… (also i’m real proud of this paper) www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.... #philsci
Cartoon drawing of Nietzsche hoovering and thinking "God I hate this thing". Caption reads Nietzsche abhors a vacuum.
Nietzsche abhors a vacuum
www.worldofmoose.com/products/nie...
🚨Project 🚨My project “Human Genomics without Racism” kicks off during #ISHPSSB25.
Join us for the Symposium “Values, Bias, and Controversies” on Monday 21, 14:30.
#philsky
#popgen
#evosky
#STS
#biological
#HPbio
hugera.org
A black and white drawing of three dachshunds arranged vertically, each holding a different optical illusion object in its mouth, and the dogs themselves drawn as if a single line optical illusion. The top dog holds a Penrose triangle, the middle dog holds a Necker cube, and the bottom dog holds a Penrose trident. The dogs’ bodies are elongated in an exaggerated cartoon style. The artwork is signed “@IndieTheIntrovert” in the bottom right corner.
Everyone stop, this is important
I’m going to read this in my inner voice.
Many of these examples came together in our new chapter on Lonely Objects and Obsolete Affordances (@tomroberts.bsky.social and @joelkrueger.com)! Thanks so much for the inspiration ❤️
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
@celsoneto.bsky.social?
44!
Statement of solidarity and support in response to the recent UK Supreme Court ruling and EHRC guidance: The Society for Women In Philosophy UK (SWIP UK) condemns the recent Supreme Court ruling on 16 April 2025 determining that the term ‘woman’ in the Equality Act 2010 refers to a binary and biological notion of ‘sex’, and the subsequent interim guidance published by the EHRC on 25 April 2025. This ruling and the guidance undermine the human rights and safety of trans, non-binary, and intersex people and are also detrimental to cis women. Trans women are women, and belong in feminist organisations. There is no fight against sexism and misogyny separate from the fight against cissexism and transmisogyny. SWIP UK membership, in line with our recognitions and aims, has for many years been open to trans women and to other trans and/or non-binary people who feel the category of ‘woman’ is relevant to their experiences, and this will not change under any circumstances. The legal landscape is currently very unclear and rapidly changing. We are in the process of finding out what concrete steps, if any, we need to take to ensure the continuation of our current approach to membership. We will involve members in this in accordance with our bylaws. We plan to respond to the EHRC consultation which closes at the end of May, and anyone who would like to support our efforts on this is invited to get in touch with us via our websites contact form.
Brilliant statement from the Society for Women in Philosophy - a model response to recent events.
"SWIP UK membership, in line with our recognitions and aims, has for many years been open to trans women and to other trans and/or non-binary people [...] this will not change under any circumstances"
Labour has a whopping great majority and four years left to turn this country around.
They should be setting the agenda, not chasing about trying to placate voters of a party with five MPs who will never vote for them anyway.
It's not only disappointing... it's embarrassing
‘[O]n the one hand, by far the longest-standing theories of beauty construed it as partly objective and dependent on form; on the other hand, many of late think that there is little we can say about what makes objects beautiful, other than that they please us..’ - Panos Paris, 'On Beauty and Wellformedness'
In this open access 🔓 article, Panos Paris breathes new life into a view of beauty that has fallen on hard times, despite holding sway for millennia. doi.org/10.1093/aest...
‘When I read the poem in my accent, which retains some of its regional inflections, tones, and cadences despite my own years in the formal institutions of British life, the lines do not rhyme. And they do not rhyme to the ear of those with many of the standard accents of the north-east or south-west of England, for example, or of Wales and Northern Ireland. More significantly for what follows, the lines do not rhyme in the voices of those from the post-industrial heartlands of central Scotland, from working-class regions of London, Birmingham, or Liverpool, or from traditional rural constituencies across the United Kingdom.’ - Tom Roberts 'Voice, Rhyme, and Aesthetic Injustice’
In this advance article, Tom Roberts argues that appreciators can suffer aesthetic injustice when excluded from aesthetic goods more fully available to others.
We're hiring! Lecturer in Philosophy (Artificial Intelligence and Data). Deadline for applications: 17th April 2025 www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DML775/l... #philsky #philmind #cogsci #philsci
This is just to say
I have read the Yemen strike plans
that were in
the group chat
and which
you were probably saving
for those
with appropriate security clearance
Forgive me
they were delicious
so strategic
and so secret