One of the most comprehensive takes you’ll find on Kevin Warsh! Essential reading
Posts by Monica DiLeo
📣 New #openaccess #BJPIR article out now!
'Why the Fed and ECB parted ways on climate change: The politics of divergence in the global central banking community' by @monicadileo.bsky.social, @glennrudebusch.bsky.social &
@jvtk.bsky.social
🔗 buff.ly/hF3lr0B
@polstudiesassoc.bsky.social
Happy to share that my next book 'The Fiscal Fed' will be published by University of Chicago Press in Fall 2026!
Cover design pending: happy to share this beautiful poster from the Harvard Law and Political Economy Project (2023).
Why do global environmental institutions multiply and persist even when they seem unable to address biodiversity loss and environmental governance failures effectively?
Our new OA article with @jacquelinebest.bsky.social in @risjnl.bsky.social tries to answer this question. 1/7
cup.org/4hZNlcX
Thanks John!
New report out now with @granthamlse.bsky.social CETEx: "A framework for central banks navigating political uncertainty in the transition"
cetex.org/publications...
How do political institutions shape today’s wave of economic interventionism? 🇺🇸 vs 🇪🇺
Find out in our new article just out in @govjournal.bsky.social
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.... @donatodc.bsky.social
NEW PUBLICATION - The Great Dane @mathiaslarsen.bsky.social Larsen and I review the differing concepts of state-led approaches to the green transition over the past two decades. We attempt to provide some conceptual coherence to the debate. The article is Open Access.
Migrating birds, selective blindness, strategic skepticism, weaponized uncertainty – this paper has it all. Do give it a read, it's excellent work.
Since the start of von der Leyen's second mandate, EU sustainable finance norms face intense dismantling pressures. My new @JEPP article shows this started years ago when the fossil fuel industry “woke up” to the EU Taxonomy. 🧵 #EUTaxonomy #SustainableFinance👇 1/10
🚨 New paper accepted in @JCMS_journal! 🚨
"Central bankers as migrating birds: How inflation shapes the rhetorical strategies of doves and hawks"
With Bart Stellinga and Matthias Thiemann
Paper: doi.org/10.1111/jcms...
Blog: lnkd.in/eNAm9NzA
🚨 Very happy to announce that our paper "Warning words in a warming world: Central bank communication and climate change" has been accepted in the European Economic Review!
Open access here: doi.org/10.1016/j.eu...
With @emacampiglio.bsky.social @davideromelli.bsky.social and Ginevra Scalisi
Is the climate strategy behind the IRA dead after the GOP's massive cuts to its clean energy subsidies?
In my new piece for @foreignaffairs.com, I argue: No!
www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...
Screenshot of the title page of linked article: "Noisy Politics, Quiet Technocrats: Strategic Silence by Central Banks" By Benjamin Braun and Maximilian Düsterhöft
🚨New article🚨 The consensus is that contestation pushed central banks to talk 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 about inequality & climate.
Our theory: At first, CBs seek to ward off politicization by talking 𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 about controversial topics.
We tested this 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐡𝐲𝐩𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐬.🧵
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Enabled by institutional capacity & aligned political and technocratic priorities, the People’s Bank of China has led on green central banking. It: acted early; addresses broad environmental issues beyond climate; promotes green investment, not just prudential policies.
doi.org/10.1080/1356...
ABSTRACT Popular debates about political barriers to the clean energy transition increasingly acknowledge the mass public’s role, but often summarize its importance with amorphous concepts like ‘political’ or ‘public will.’ This essay clarifies how the public’s beliefs, preferences, and behaviors affect the clean energy transition through three channels: policymaker incentives, electoral selection, and technology adoption and siting. In turn, we consider how energy and climate policy design can influence the mass public’s preferences, emphasizing cost and benefit visibility, public perceptions of distributional effects, and cross-domain policy linkages. Drawing from our framework, we outline priorities for public opinion research on the clean energy transition.
New!
Public opinion foundations of the clean energy transition by
Alexander F. Gazmararian, Matto Mildenberger & Dustin Tingley.
This review article clarifies how public opinion's role in the clean energy transition, & charts priorities for future research.
doi.org/10.1080/0964...
🚨New Publication 🚨 in New Political Economy with the one and only@mathiaslarsen.bsky.social. We propose the term 'Green Financial Planning' to tie together many of the terms in political economy at the moment, and demonstrate that green finance is much more than a few loans/bonds with green names
This Wednesday at QMUL - @aargatsbmatqmul.bsky.social hosts 'Transforming Central Banking in the Ecological Crisis: intersecting perspectives from political economy and accounting'.
Register and share:
www.tickettailor.com/events/queen...
Brilliant (and scary) analysis
Haha, so glad I could provide this for you
15/ @romainsvartzman.bsky.social @manuelamoschella.bsky.social @mattvermeir.bsky.social @nilskupzok.bsky.social @sylvainmaechler.bsky.social @carogarriga.bsky.social @danmertens.bsky.social @stephangruber.bsky.social @greencb.bsky.social
14/ may be of interest to @jdeyris.bsky.social @benbraun.bsky.social @matthiasthiemann.bsky.social @jvtk.bsky.social @steffenmurau.bsky.social @danielagabor.bsky.social @krdgnydn.bsky.social @james7jackson.bsky.social @adamtooze.bsky.social @apsmolenska.bsky.social @johannespetry.bsky.social
13/ We are grateful to central banking special issue editors @amyverdun.bsky.social and Lucia Quaglia and the other contributors @wabateman.bsky.social @nfraccaroli.bsky.social @vincentab.bsky.social (and the rest who are not on Bluesky!)
12/ We build especially on existing work on green finance in China by @mathiaslarsen.bsky.social, @christianelliott.bsky.social, Simon Dikau, Uli Volz, and many others cited in the paper
11/ However, we conclude by pointing out that the PBoC hasn't always been dark green. China remains the world's largest coal consumer, and the PBoC has had to navigate directly the complexity of China’s competing short and long term objectives
10/ Second, technocratic entrepreneurship. At the PBoC, this has taken two main forms:
1. Raising the profile of certain issues over others
2. Shaping the particular ways these topics are addressed
9/ We draw inspiration from Jones and @shaharhameiri.bsky.social to highlight the ways that these political incentives make their way to the PBoC
8/ First, pressures from the wider political context. In China, the PBoC's political incentives come in the form of party-state hierarchy rather than central bank independence. And pollution was a big political problem for China when the PBoC was beginning its work 🏭
7/ We instead highlight how two variables from the lit on Western central banks also are relevant for the PBoC, but manifest in different ways 💡
6/ However, we argue that this can’t explain in a more positive sense why the PBoC became a leader on *this* particular issue; nor the particular timing or focus on wider environmental issues ❌