I don't need to be in that situation to say that the idea of ​​"endo system is medically impossible" is wrong. I don't know that situation, but PLURALITY is not DID, not even all people with DID consider themselves plural. Now, if that person equated non-CDD plurality with DID, that is indeed wrong

Y'all have VERY LIMITED knowledge and think you have the right to dictate what is "medically impossible" or not. (3/3)

(since many professionals ignore this and treat something cultural/religious as a disorder).

Not only that, but believing that plurality only stems from severe dissociation shows a lack of understanding of what plurality is. (2/3)

Whoever says that is so immersed in their little white and European/American world that it's agonizing. There are cultures and religions where the idea of ​​"more than one identity" is present, in fact, the ICD itself states that in these cases, the person should not be diagnosed with DID (1/3)

Não tem tanto livro ainda, mas eu vou ir atualizando!

Bookshelf

@notte

Gente, se vocês quiserem conhecer livros de diversos temas, baixem esse app e me sigam. Lá eu criei estantes e etiquetas de assuntos variados. Eu não sei se dá pra ver os resumos, mas se der eu vou fazer resumos dos livros que eu for lendo também!