I’m totally puzzled.
In France, the right legalised contraception, abortion (voluntary termination of pregnancy), reimbursement of contraception by social security, divorce by mutual consent, aligned legal age of both genders for marriage… First parity based govt was a right wing one.
I don’t know how long I can survive living in a world that sees my suffering as a threat to shared women’s suffering rather than as part of it.
It’s true, I just wonder why it doesn’t apply to me. Believe all women, but not me. If I share something painful, one doesn’t see me speaking from what we share as women first, but instead assume I’m manipulating. It hurts. Then I start to really believe I’m not part of shared humanity
“kan bekritiseerd worden”
Actually every view can be criticised.
Ouch, you came here. Courage...
Thank you 🙏
I was not like this before
Will delete the app once I have answers to some private messages.
I’m so brittle I am afraid of dying m
Wasn’t like that before
The event is supposed to be political neutral, a bit of a farce. True: small flags of most nations and people, no preference, are sold. Collected at the event, bringing your own is not allowed. Singling one flag out is disingenuous and divisive.
flag-shop.eurovision...
2/2
It laments corrosion of norms and legality in warfare but focuses exclusively on one side. The author's self-described "liberal extremist" stance (from his public profile) shapes the moral binary: kind/strong vs. cruel/weak, with Trump embodying the latter.
My grade : 1/20
12/
Double standards: The piece calls for international pressure, firewalls, and refusing to "stand by" or concede to Trump—language that echoes "resistance" framing common against certain leaders but rarely applied symmetrically (eg, to authoritarian actions by lR).
11/
Historical analogies serve to diminish Trump's actions as uniquely senseless and subhuman, while implying past Western or Allied actions had gravitas. Mental decline claims are asserted from posting style without evidence.
10/
Exaggerations: Trump's threats become "genocidal rhetoric" treated like reality-TV barbarism. Global economic ripples and individual fears are presented as direct, cascading results of his "dribbling half-conceived incentives."
9/
Opposing views or any rationale from the Trump side get dismissed as cultish enablers. Democrats, prior era-policies, or left-leaning foreign policy failures are entirely absent—as if the slate was clean before Trump.
8/
including 30-40K massacred in two days on Jan8-9, attacks on shipping, etc.), prior US policy, Oct7 aftermath ripple effects, or Israel's security concerns. No mention of what IR was doing that might have prompted pressure. Ceasefire & diplomacy appear only as confused backdrops to Trump's chaos
7/
One-sided distortion and absolving wrongdoings:
The article is relentlessly focused on Trump's "unhinged" posts and personality. There's zero context on long-running US-IR tensions, Islamic regime behaviour: proxies, nuclear programme, internal repression +++
6/
Genocide has a precise legal and historical meaning. Using it here for rhetorical force turns a grave term into a political cudgel. It doesn't engage with intent, scale, actual outcomes, or Iran's role/actions. It's emotional escalation, not analysis.
5/
Diluting a word with strong historical sense ("genocide"):
Equating Trump's threats/posts (even ugly ones) and a chaotic week of diplomacy/ceasefire attempts directly to genocide—the deliberate intent to destroy a group in whole or in part—is a massive stretch.
4/
It distorts events into something one-sided, absolves or ignores inconvenient realities on the "good" side of the ledger, exaggerates for effect, and cheapens heavy historical language to rally the tribe.
3/
whose supporters are a death cult, and "right-thinking people" as the bulwark. It generates urgency and moral clarity for the author's audience while erasing trade-offs, context, or the other side's agency/grievances.
2/
I love @marcveld.bsky.social but this piece is everything but great.
It is textbook narrative control: complex, messy geopolitics (threats, deterrence, alliances, regime change pressures) reduced to a morality play with one deranged villain,
1/
C'est n'importe quoi. Une bouillie vide de sens, très mauvaise interprétation, cadre idéologique imposé comme une vérité absolue.
Je mets 1/20 car on ne peut pas mettre 0
Here we are bsky.app/profile/marc...
Well, that could work for you but I’m Israeli, therefore not human according to many academics.
Anyway, between the ideological rigidity and bad DMs unable to support pictures and videos, seeing the userbase decline is unsurprising.
Same except that I quickly became disappointed and avoid this academic community in Bluesky now
No, it’s 2026, no reason to wear a mask unless you’re in specific settings or are immune compromised.
Also, when you get exposed, the only thing that makes a difference is your immunity, then the single key intervention that matters most is vaccination, not maskingZ
Some (often left leaning) Westerners assume we need their validation to provide a testimony of violence, relate to something, talk about our lived experience, name our oppressors, or even open our mouth…
We don’t.
Lorsque Naama Levy, symbole des violences sexuelles du 7 octobre, a été libérée, j’ai guetté les réactions féministes. Sans surprise, je n’ai pas vu grand-chose. Alors plutôt que de rester en colère, j’ai écrit une tribune dans @tenoua.bsky.social : www.tenoua.org/naama-levy-o...
Amirhossein Hatami 💔
✍️ @ilanblock.bsky.social
Ja 😊🐁
Regime is weakened, it’s paving the way for Iranian people to take to the street. Not today, but in a few weeks or months.
Destroying such a regime takes time, just like building global immunity to a novel virus. The pandemic lasted 3 years. It doesn’t mean vaccines didn’t work.