They mentioned it in the blog announcement, but totally makes sense
Posts by Christian Minich
of course part of the motivation was so agents could create graphs
It’s never been easier to by a polyglot, and also paradoxically never as low of a need to be a polyglot
#dataBS #rstats #python
But as data science tooling “grew up,” it borrowed from the business analytics world more and more. ibis, dbplyr, Arrow, ADBC, flight SQL, parquet, Iceberg, Databricks offering more and more sql support, duckdb, and now ggsql represent the triumph of data science tooling.
Data Science is like shadow IT that eventually took over regular IT.
It was long and honestly kinda torturous to have 2-3 versions of the same technology for years, and while data science was growing up kind of worse versions? Eg pandas being slow, or dplyr not supporting in database computation
With the help of the Sandy Hook families, The Onion has reached a long-awaited deal to take over InfoWars.
We've enlisted the help of @timheidecker.bsky.social, who will be InfoWars' Creative Director.
Please stand by for more.
I'm going to be thinking about this for a while -- declarative visualization, in your database engine instead of as an add on. Feels very @evidence.dev but as a SQL extension vs. as markdown?
Is buckets of slop on Facebook. It’s AI overviews. It’s a load of hype that feels like horseshit. Stories of teens committing suicidal at the encouragement of Gen AI. Data centers!
In so many ways, transformative for enterprise and ubiquitous but neutral to bad for most folks in most places today
Listening to @reckless.bsky.social and the folks at the Verge explains a lot.
My own work (output and process) has shifted dramatically in the past year in particular. True for the software engineers I work with, the product folks, the designers, all of it!
But consumers? AI for them ..
It’s called pulling a Bluesky
Friday night: always a good time for some Muppet Treasure Island
I also think the lack of concrete different advice is because we don’t actually know what is optimal for agents. What’s good for humans is better for agents than _nothing_, but I think there’s loads of undiscovered county and I’d bet things look very different in 6 months
Eg, our Dagster skills repo has much more terse instructions on our dbt integration vs. pointing to the human docs, because we found performance worse.
We’re discussing how to handle drift etc
GitHub: github.com/dagster-io/s...
And a blog on lightweight evals: dagster.io/blog/evaluat...
I think the concept of progressive disclosure is the same between agents and humans, but I think the implementations might be different.
We’ve found terse, minimal documentation better for skills (both input and output tokens), which is not true for humans.
Also Crypto is right there!
Pipes are sick, and love open systems that anyone can create and build on
Tough times for Onion headline writers these days when reality is so absurd
They say never be good at what you don’t want to do more of, not sure how to apply that to reviewing AI code ha
Listening to Wes McKinney on the Test Set, he's got a whole agentic review setup which feels like the eventual future. Humans reviewing AI generated code seems like a mistake of some kind
So cool. Love what you can do with open source and open tools 😎
New post. You built an ML model with {tidymodels} that you want automated in Dagster. Engineering's reply: "Sorry, we need this rewritten in Python to deploy." No more. With the {dagsterpipes} R package, you can run R code in Dagster with full observability. #rstats
joekirincic.com/posts/use-r-...
Everyone social media app needs this
This but also see: people shit talking competitors
Beautiful and thought provoking essay by @mitsuhiko.at It’s ostensibly about AI, but it’s a much more general point about useful criticism requires deep engagement, and that most critics don’t want to.
In other words, selection bias rules everything around me.
lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/4/11/th...
Lord grant me the audacity of this cedar playhouse maker who put “add branding plate” as step 54 in a 3 hour setup
I think the job of a software engineer at those AI labs looks different (~no handcrafted code), but the huge returns to great software engineers using AI harnesses to ship makes these talent acquisitions valuable to them
I’ve been absolutely part of the nerds mocking the “it’s too powerful to release” mantra. That feels like the 4 hour erection warning for software. This morning I actually sat down to read details about Mythos. 😳 Um. We’ve got a systemic problem. It’s finding zero days by the dozen. 1/n
This is true if I were a data engineer but since I’m a sales engineer it’s a little harder to convey