doody from a booty

spay the spire

I have questions about trans people in sports:
1. Are they staying hydrated?
2. I'm going to the gas station, do they want anything?
3. Have they heard that the bird is the word?

atp I have the notifications turned off and I just use it if I ever think of a silly pun and want to see if anyone else has ever posted it

collecting them like omnigender mr krabs

The collaborators lecture you on the value of peaceful protest as you are murdered in the street.

Opinion | Bugs Shat In Our Walls. Maybe That's OK.

Are you backing off of your claims about a downward trend?

Do you think I need a counter-claim to disbelieve a claim I'm disputing?

It could, whether or not such a trend in partner-seeking exists, and I never disputed that it could. Do you have evidence that fewer people are seeking partners?

What are you talking about? Did they say they were seeking partners ten years ago and no longer are? Why are you trying to make this about sexism rather than your own scientific illiteracy?

You're still ignoring relevant questions, and now you're trying to make this about sexism because you have no evidence.

Please provide your evidence of how many single women sought a partner ten years ago.

The evidence would be responses to a poll from ten years ago. Do you have that evidence? Or just the unfounded claim you keep making?

Also, did it even ask them whether they were single and seeking a partner ten years ago?

Also, still not sure why you think asking for evidence and making a counter-claim are the same thing. If someone claims the number of stars in the universe is even, and I ask them for evidence, that isn't me claiming the number is odd.

Where did the Stanford researcher claim fewer women are seeking relationships?

Where does it say that more women sought a partner 10 years ago?

So what? That doesn't provide data about what happened ten years ago.

Evidence?

Enough pivoting, please provide evidence for the 10-year trend you claim exists.

"These findings are based on a
survey conducted Oct. 16-28, 2019, among 4,860 U.S. adults."

It is a survey conducted over two weeks, not a study of the past ten years.

-seeking partners has gone DOWN, not up. Please give evidence to the contrary if you want to make this claim.

I really don't know why you think asking for evidence is the same as making a claim, but it's just not.

Looking at this again, there are multiple issues you still seem to have with your understanding.

First, as I said, you have provided no evidence of a downward trend in partner-seeking.

Second, I never claimed mankeeping isn't leading any women to not seek partners.

Third, the number no longer-

There was not a time frame studied. This was a survey of what women were saying at one point in time, not a ten year study.

No, that's not what the data says. The data says single women currently say that dating has gotten harder in the past 10 years, and says that 38% of them are seeking a partner. Do you jave any data on what they were saying or seeking 10 years ago?

What ten-year trend? Do you have evidence that the number of women seeking a partner was higher 10 years ago?

Also, the difference over time IS the trend. That's what a trend is.

Did they list emotional labor among those reasons? You're trying verrrry hard to interpret the data to fit what you want. You need to provide evidence when you make claims.

I never said I did. You simply don't have the evidence to show the trend you're claiming exists.

What evidence? You haven't presented any evidence of the trend you claim is happening. More women seek relationships now than in the past, which I directly showed evidence for. What evidence do you have that contradicts it?

Are you no longer saying there is a downward trend in women seeking relationships? Obviously there is a gender gap. What I'm telling you is that your claim of a downward trend is in direct conflict with the evidence that shows an upward trend.