Ferguson is a rambling, unfaithful egomaniac.

Who thinks his (personally perceived) looks make him telly friendly and thus somehow trustworthy.

He has none of the laudable qualities he pretends to have.

Do some damn research man, and stop trying to be a celebrity. You’re past it.

While the country was working its arse off to be the worlds 5th largest economy again, he was a bumbling fool who thought it was awfully clever to appoint a friend of Epstein - yeah he knew.

Lawyers can’t be trusted.

I assure you, kids pick up no information in US schools. That’s why they end up bigots like you.

They scan and know they are M class planets before they go. It’s why they choose to have any red jumpers in the uniform selection that you should worry about.

Talibania

Al Dersh has announced he is decidedly pro-genocide. Who would have ever guessed?

Oh you did. You dropped the competitiveness when the evidence was in. Rather gracious I thought. Very non brosphere. Fierce slay!

Kier is so desperate to keep his job he has started doing a decent job. Best keep the pressure on the useless bugger. He might catch on!

He won’t get where he is today …

Lego is FROM Denmark… the clues were there!!

And @georgetakei.bsky.social is a great man and the epitome of dignity and bravery. Love George so much ❤️.

Thank you for conceding.

Women just naturally make better scientists. Men are soooo emotional.

But …Slay!

Fucking repellent @bbcnewsnight.bsky.social

People dress up like locals today as a mark of friendship. You think they didnt tried each other’s kit on before today????!!! Just diplomacy mate.

That’s some of obscure psychiatrist. I’m a hard scientist. Fundamental physics.

Soft science is called soft for good reasons. It’s badly quantified. Sloppy and flaccid.

I’ve studied both to PhD level so I’m clear on which science changes the world and which consumes coffee at dull conferences.

You have no clue how research works. Quantification is science. The rest is waffle. Blocked.

Mate we are from different academic areas. Yours is not more relevant nor superior to advanced physics. Take a seat. I don’t want to engage. Never did. Go away. Your personal research is useless of NO interest to me. I’m a physicist. Do be quiet with this nagging

Never seen research done without quantifiable data. Only opinions.

Also as teacher used to say on your homework:
UNITS!!!!!!

I was pointing out YOUR link was flagged as chatGPT. Don’t recommend the link - easy!

The book isn’t remotely relevant to the conversation I was involved in love. You got into the wrong thread somehow.

Sir I worked hundreds of feet underground at a European particle accelerator calibrating way better shit.

When d’you ever calibrate the largest machines on the planet or work to femto-metre accuracy?

Or spent your nights at observatories watching distant galaxies, freezing effing cold. HMM 🤨

Cartels are bad. I didn’t spend the 1980s learning this from JR Ewing to have it happen again today!!!!

Saving our retinas some hideous hot takes. God bless them for curating the horror.

That book has a warning on Wikipedia noting it was written by ChatGPT.

So yeah…

Is it though? Take a poll and quantify that statement!

Desk researchers! 🤦🏼‍♀️

You don’t read too good. I didn’t claim that. You’ve confused yourself. And gone off on your own topic.

It’s not sending us to the moon. But a lot of coffee is consumed. Name any qualitative research that was purely qualitative and added to science/human knowledge. Publish or perish in the soft sciences. A lot of waffle. And terrible surveys all answered by college kids on campus.

Right back at you.