RFK Jr. just said HHS is "cleaning up the risk pool" (i.e., people who are unhealthy) to bring down healthcare costs.
Posts by Shaun Murrant (βπ§π»π³οΈβπ)
And yet, RFK Jr is still allowed to walk free
Ah yes
bsky.app/profile/shel...
We do not tolerate enbyphobia (bigotry toward nonbinary people) on this timeline.
And if you are personally enbyphobic, unfollow me now, and fuck all the way off.
If you don't think nonbinary people are real trans people, get the fuck off my timeline. π€¬
Right now Candace Owens is claiming Laura Loomer isn't actually Jewish and Laura is saying that Charlie choosing Erika over Candace is proof that god cursed her and it made me realize that leftist infighting isn't all that bad
Several years ago, I was coming out of a local bagel shop. Dude looks at my e-bike, rolls down his window, and says "That's cheating."
I looked at him and said "Dude, you drove an F350 to a bagel shop. I don't think you get to judge cheating."
Zarah is correct. Kier Starmer is a Liar
Trump is arguably the most evil president the United States has ever had and that's really saying something because the competition is steep.
UK media has largely overlooked a CNN report revealing 64 million men enrolled in online 'rape academy' courses.
@skwawkbox.org reports.
These fishermen are lucky to be alive. We will probably never know how many of the ~180 people killed in similar US attacks were also just fishermen.
It's ideology not ethnicity.
It's ideology not ethnicity.
It's ideology not ethnicity.
It's ideology not ethnicity.
It's ideology not ethnicity.
It's ideology not ethnicity.
Just finished cobbling together a reference picture for a painting I want to do. I want to paint a portait of John Brown that's fairly accurate but in a pose a little different from his existing portraits (I want him holding one of the 'cabbage chopper' swords).
A man raped a woman because he thought she was Muslim.
This where all the racist anti-immigration propaganda leads.
And it is all the real criminals REALLY destroying the UK behind it all.
A Labour Home Secretary absolutely leaning in to their anointed role as the nation's authoritarian thug.
HOMELESSNESS SETS THE FLOOR FOR EVERYONE'S WAGES.
FEAR OF HOMELESSNESS KEEPS POORER WORKERS IN LINE.
MIDDLE CLASSES GET TOLD POORER WORKERS ARE "UNSKILLED" AND SO THEY DON'T DESERVE TO HAVE LIVABLE WAGES.
WHISLT THE RICH KEEP PROFIT CREATED BY BOTH OF THEM.
HOMELESSNESS SETS THE FLOOR FOR EVERYONE'S WAGES.
FEAR OF HOMELESSNESS KEEPS POORER WORKERS IN LINE.
MIDDLE CLASSES GET TOLD POORER WORKERS ARE "UNSKILLED" AND SO THEY DON'T DESERVE TO HAVE LIVABLE WAGES.
WHISLT THE RICH KEEP PROFIT CREATED BY BOTH OF THEM.
deeply unfunny premise, horrid response that also happens to be amazingly unfunny, just ? ? ?
Gobsmacked
I doubt any white politician [Starmer?! Cooper?!] would joke about deporting Badenoch [or Mahmood] even if threw in Davey, Polanski /Farage.
So this does look like an example not so much of saying "don't deny me a voice as a minority" as feeling [more?] permission to do taser & deportation jokes
The government faces two opposition parties runming on mass deportations as their central public argument: Reform and Restore. This is a joke about deporting opponents from the Home Secretary [in the interview in which she says some of her critics don't believe she should be in the country]
Politico report the Home Secretary was asked who out of Zack Polanski, Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch or Ed Davey she would taser or deport.
Mahmood replied: βAll of the above.β
So Home Secretary is herself able to joke about deporting Badenoch, Polanski & Farage.
(Farage ought not to reciprocate)
'Don't delegitimise my right to a voice because of what you believe I should think' is fine: assert a right to own view+voice.
But this involves delegitimising criticism - based on your own characteristics & those of your opponents - while claiming that criticism does that to you.
This was the Home Secretary (Labour, a British south Asian woman) arguing that the personal characteristics of another MP (the LibDem Home Affairs spokesman, a white British man) invalidate his argument, because he does not share her characteristics or experiences.
It is exhausting for the accurate argument "its not racist to voice concerns about immigration [unless they are racist]" to now become fused to a *presumption* of racism if voice [liberal] criticisms of Shabana Mahmood [who may herself want to critique Braverman or Yusuf or Farage occasionally]
Is the Home Secretary's hypothesis that Yvette Cooper wouldn't be criticised if tabled the same asylum/settlement reforms?!
The personal characteristics of Nigel Farage/Zia Yusuf, Chris Philp/Kemi Badenoch, Shabana Mahmood/Starmer seem v marginal to who supports/opposes their immigration plans!