Advertisement ยท 728 ร— 90

Posts by Tijl Grootswagers

Super excited to share that our paper, โ€œMultiple Partially Overlapping Neural Modules Orchestrate Conflict Processing,โ€ has been accepted for publication in Imaging Neuroscience! ๐ŸŽ‰
1/n

w/ @tgro.bsky.social @manuelvarlet.bsky.social Edmund Wascher, Patrick Gajewski

direct.mit.edu/imag/article...

1 month ago 22 10 1 0
Post image

๐Ÿ“ข We're hiring: Charter Hall Senior Research Fellow - #Neuroscience of #Ageing & #Dementia | Help shape healthier futures for older adults.

๐Ÿ“† Closes 24 Mar 2026
๐Ÿ’ฐ $147,138โ€“$169,011 + 17% Super
๐ŸŒŽ Visa sponsorship available

๐Ÿ‘‰ Apply now: lnkd.in/gKX_XR8r

@westernsydneyu.bsky.social

1 month ago 3 5 0 0

This paper had a pretty shocking headline result (40% of voxels!), so I dug into it, and I think it is wrong. Essentially: they compare two noisy measures and find that about 40% of voxels have different sign between the two. I think this is just noise!

3 months ago 238 99 8 9

An abbreviation (ABB) in a journal article (JA) or Grant Application (GA) is rarely worth the words it saves. Every ABB requires cognitive resources (CR) and at my age by the time I'm halfway through a JA or GA I no longer have the CR to remember what your ABB stood for.

8 months ago 446 132 12 25

Congrats!!

4 months ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
Collaborating minds think alike, processing information in similar ways in a shared task Whether great minds think alike is up for debate, but the collaborating minds of two people working on a shared task process information alike, according to a study published November 25th in the open...

Collaborating minds think alike, processing information in similar ways in a shared task | EurekAlert! www.eurekalert.org/news-release...

New publication in PLOS Biology: plos.io/4hBhuPy

Denise Moerel, with @tgro.bsky.social, @drquekles.bsky.social, Sophie Smit at @marcsinstitute.bsky.social

4 months ago 12 2 2 0
Post image

Pre conference run - ready for ACNS2025 ๐Ÿง 
@acnsau.bsky.social

4 months ago 3 0 0 0
Preview
When we see someone being touched, our brains automatically simulate how it feels Within a fraction of a second of seeing another person being touched, our brains figure out who is involved and how it might feel.

Can sight shape our feelings? ๐Ÿ‘๏ธโ€๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿง 

@theconversation.com article co-authored by Dr Sophie Smit & Dr @tgro.bsky.social, uncovers how fast our brain transforms what we see into what we feel.

Read it here: theconversation.com/when-we-see-...
The Imaging Neuroscience publication: doi.org/10.1162/IMAG...

5 months ago 4 3 0 0
Advertisement

New preprint from the lab led by @violetchae.bsky.social! We debut an open EEG dataset for research into food cognition and dietary choices.

Featuring data from 117 different brains relating to 120 different food stimuli.

@tgro.bsky.social @psychunimelb.bsky.social

5 months ago 15 5 0 1
Preview
FOODEEG: An open dataset of human electroencephalographic and behavioural responses to food images Investigating the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying food choices has the potential to advance our understanding of eating behaviour and inform health-targeted interventions and policy. Large, publi...

Our new preprint on the FOODEEG open dataset is out! EEG recordings and behavioural responses on food cognition tasks for 117 participants will be made publicly available ๐Ÿง  @danfeuerriegel.bsky.social @tgro.bsky.social

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

5 months ago 20 11 0 2
Preview
Even in a simple game, our brains keep score โ€“ and those scores shape every choice we make Humans are surprisingly bad at being unpredictable.

Dr Denise Moerel and colleagues' article on how our brains make decisions in competitive settings is out now!

Read the full Conversation article here: theconversation.com/even-in-a-si...

The article published in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience: academic.oup.com/scan/advance...

5 months ago 4 2 0 0
Post image

๐ŸŒ Come spend some time with us in Sydney! ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ

@marcsinstitute.bsky.social is offering International Visiting Scholarships for PhD students + postdocs.

Spend 1โ€“3 months collaborating, exploring ideas, and building connections.

๐Ÿ“… Apply by 4 Dec
๐Ÿ“ Sydney, Australia

Curious or keen? DM or email me

5 months ago 12 5 0 0

New article in @theconversation.com - featuring some exciting new findings on how our brains rapidly encode a wide range of food properties when we see a food item.

Your brain is doing a lot of work when you scroll through food delivery apps!

Led by @violetchae.bsky.social w/ @tgro.bsky.social

5 months ago 16 4 1 0
Redirecting

Using EEG ๐Ÿง โšก and representational similarity analysis, we mapped how the neural representations of food attributes (e.g., taste & health) unfold over time when viewing foods๐ŸŽ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฅ— @danfeuerriegel.bsky.social @tgro.bsky.social

theconversation.com/our-brains-e...

doi.org/10.1016/j.ap...

5 months ago 17 7 0 2
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users โ€” in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industryโ€™s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or even imposed on users โ€” in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece, we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology industryโ€™s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAIโ€™s ChatGPT and
Appleโ€™s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI (black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAIโ€™s ChatGPT and Appleโ€™s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf. Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al. 2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles

Finally! ๐Ÿคฉ Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industryโ€™s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n

7 months ago 3944 1974 111 406
Advertisement

We're looking forward to seeing you this week at the joint meeting of the ๐˜ˆ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜—๐˜ด๐˜บ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜บ and the ๐˜ˆ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ข-๐˜—๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ!

Don't forget to tag us on your conference-related Bluesky posts, so we can help you share with our wonderful community! ๐Ÿ˜€

10 months ago 9 5 0 0
PhD position in biological foundations of neural control PhD position in biological foundations of neural control

๐ŸšจPhD position alert!๐Ÿšจ
Joint PhD position with @fedemar.bsky.social @predictivebrain.bsky.social and Sonja Kotz, to investigate the neurobiological underpinnings of perceptual decisions
vacancies.maastrichtuniversity.nl/job/Maastric...
Please share and if you have questions, send me a message!

10 months ago 40 35 1 2
Preview
Characterising the neural time-courses of food attribute representations Dietary decisions involve the consideration of multiple, often conflicting, food attributes that precede the computation of an overall value for a food. The differences in the speed at which attribute...

New preprint from the lab!

We used EEGโšก๐Ÿง  to map how 12 different food attributes are represented in the brain. ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿฅฆ๐Ÿฅช๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฎ

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

Led by Violet Chae in collaboration with @tgro.bsky.social

11 months ago 21 6 0 0

Interested in pupillometry, eye movements, visual attention, visual working memory, or related topics? Apply with our group in in beautiful, livable, and friendly Groningen! Reach out to @elkanakyurek.bsky.social, @van-rijn.org, @olaf.dimigen.de, @miles2708.bsky.social or myself to explore options!

11 months ago 16 12 2 0
Post image

Why academia is sleepwalking into self-destruction. My editorial @brain1878.bsky.social If you agree with the sentiments please repost. It's important for all our sakes to stop the madness
academic.oup.com/brain/articl...

1 year ago 539 308 51 104

Check out this preprint led by @sabomelinda.bsky.social
which presents the outcomes of her @marcsinstitute.bsky.social visiting scholarship!

We analysed EEG data from 500+ participants to investigate how the brain processes cognitive conflict. #PsychSciSky #neuroskyence

doi.org/10.1101/2025...

1 year ago 12 2 0 0

๐ŸšจPhD opportunity Fall/Winter
2025๐Ÿšจ
Join me in Geneva Switzerland #unige to learn more about colour perception. Using neuroimaging & computational modelling, you'll be working with an international & interdisciplinary team to understand how we transform light into a colourful world!๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐ŸŒˆ #neurojobs

1 year ago 29 16 2 4

๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿšจ New scholarship available! We're hiring a PhD student to work on the neural basis of face perception, part of a collaboration between @marcsinstitute.bsky.social and #UNSW. DMs open if you want more info ๐Ÿง  #neurojobs

1 year ago 8 6 0 0

Iโ€™m still recruiting for this position โ€” please get in touch if youโ€™re interested in working together!

1 year ago 30 27 2 0
Advertisement
Unlocking person identity codes in the human brain | Western Sydney University

#PhD #Scholarship Opportunity: Unlocking Person Identity Codes in the Human Brain ๐Ÿง  | Explore the extraordinary abilities of Super-Recognisers & contribute to the advancement of person identification technologies worldwide. #Neuroscience | Applications close 31 Jan 2025. | tinyurl.com/45c4m3kk

1 year ago 6 1 1 2

#MRITogether 'Transferable open MRI skills: from academia to industry' will be on in 30 minutes! You can still register for that!

1 year ago 5 2 0 0

Congrats @aramirezharo3.bsky.social ! Fantastic first conference talk ๐ŸŽ‰ at @acnsau.bsky.social

1 year ago 8 0 0 0

Are you an Australian cognitive neuroscientist ๐Ÿง  affiliated with the Australasian Cognitive Neuroscience Society?

This Starter Pack is a fast way to connect with your ACNS colleagues - reply here to be added! And don't forget to follow @acnsau.bsky.social Only 5 more sleeps! ๐Ÿคฉ #ACNS2024

1 year ago 11 4 2 0
Video

Newly funded ARC Discovery Project will unlock the secrets of how children learn and provide parents & educators with insights to support #childdevelopment.

Looking forward to transforming #education in Australia, one discovery at a time!

@drquekles.bsky.social

1 year ago 2 1 0 1

I just looked at a highly circulated starter pack for top science and science communicators and there are 58 men, 27 women, the rest orgs based in the US, and 95% white. Maybe, just maybe, do a bit of curation and check your biases and show some care with what you put out into the wild.

1 year ago 969 185 18 22