Or near the Ministry of Defence
Posts by Clive Parry
The FT should know better than this.
Much like the WaPo Editorial Board then?
I've written to my Senators @schiff.senate.gov @padilla.senate.gov to make this case but heard nothing back. The right thing to do but also good politics as GOP opposition to it would highlight their motives.
bsky.app/profile/bill...
Are Axios journalists really this desperate for copy?
Unfollowing - many lawyers and others explained to you why this happened after your last post on this.
A ridiculous take on the serious health crisis unfolding under RFK.
That’s a start. So how can you use the upcoming budget process to get leverage? What other Senate procedures can you use to make life difficult for Trump? Remember it is not the Dems’ job to save GOP from themselves.
Leave the trash articles to others please @financialtimes.com
I am sure the DOJ is grateful that you have given them the topline they wanted without mentioning that Blanche was previously Trumps's defense lawyer and that Maxwell was previously charged with perjury.
So you quickly push this out for them without analysis, instead of questioning if this is a real investigation or another political move from an administration not known for its interest in accurate data. Less transcription, more journalism please!
@cnn.com “Made some false claims” = “lied”. “a long-debunked claim” = “a lie”. Be concise and precise if you want to be useful.
Still more transcription than journalism. You have to read through to para 11 to find this is likely not true.
Unusually credulous headline from the Guardian. Has he shown any evidence of seriously trying so far?
Another terrible @nytimes.com headline that is more stenography than journalism. How about “Trump review could politicise and censor Smithsonian”.
Shorter version: “Trump lied about crime in DC”. Don’t be afraid to be concise and accurate.
Less transcription, more journalism please.
Bizarre take on the judge who leads a highly partisan court that has broken significant precedents and issued multiple unexplained rulings on behalf of Trump recently.
A bizarrely naive piece from the @nytimes.com written as if Roberts is somehow suddenly experiencing politics for the first time and is not the complicit leader of a highly partisan Supreme Court.
4 days ago: bsky.app/profile/muel...
We get this scare story in the media when a Labour government is elected in the UK. Doesn't seem to happen though. taxjustice.net/press/millio...
“If someone says it’s raining and another person says it’s dry, it’s not your job to quote them both. It’s your job to look out the window and find out which is true.”
Less transcription, more journalism please!
Why is it only “Lad Bible” and foreign media commenting on the embarrassing illiteracy of Trump’s trade letter and what it means for the competency of this administration? Sane washing again? @cnn.com @washingtonpost.com @nytimes.com www.ladbible.com/news/us-news...
Introduced by Lib Dem Minister Lynne Featherstone.
Drawing of pillars crumbling
How do we inspire renewed democratic engagement in an era of disillusionment?
Join us for a free event exploring current pressures on democracy, and what perceptions of democracy and authoritarianism may signal for the future of governance.
🗓️ May 8, 6pm, Sage London
Register now: bit.ly/4i6WfUs
This is a terrible idea that could effectively kill platforms such as this one through the legal exposure caused, while the very large platforms would likely have enough money to defeat most legal challenges.
This isn't a debate.
This isn't politics as usual.
It's an unprecedented crisis.
Treat it as such.