Congrats!

Ecco adesso devo sentirla 😂

🍍is a stretch 😂

Puntata molto interessante, anche questa. Complimenti!

Perhaps the fact that one would expect a LiveComponent to be its own process, while it is not, is also a source of confusion

Very interested as well! 👀

The more I use GenAI coding tools, the more I am convinced keeping to "traditional" software engineering practices is what works most productive here. As in 10x more productive. E.g.

- Small changes
- Test that the change works before moving on
- (unit) tests wherever you can

Finalmente! 🥳

Molto contento di trovarla anche qui!

Congrats!!

In that case I think is basically a different problem because processes handle messages sequentially anyways. If the outcome of the message is that the current process receives another one that would still be processed afterwards. I am not sure how knowing it upfront would change the final behaviour

I personally do not think it makes a difference because thinking of all calls being somewhat blocking makes reasoning about the overall code more easy for me.

Then again it depends what you mean by “async” calls

Well in a way writing COBOL in 2024 is kind of innovative 😂

My biggest fear of AI is our willingness to encode our biases, and prejudices, into a machine while allowing it to make decisions without accountability.