Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by James Neilson

Breaking down the @USPORTS_Bball MBB National Championship game for @uvicvikes 82-53 win over @DinosMBB

Four Factors:

EFG% ☑️Vikes 44 / Dinos 31.8
TOV% ☑️Vikes 8 / Dinos 18
ORB% ☑️Vikes 35 / Dinos 21
FTRate Vikes 21 / ☑️ Dinos 30

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Breaking down the @USPORTS_Bball
WBB National Championship game for the
@HuskieWBB 85-66 win over @CURavensBBall

Four Factors:

EFG% ☑️Huskies 56.9 / Ravens 38.2
TOV% Huskies 16.1 / ☑️Ravens 13.5
ORB% ☑️Huskies 33 / Ravens 30
FTRate ☑️Huskies 38 / Ravens 29.4

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Neilson Twins Chelsea & Sadie Rose 2026 Victoria, BC
Neilson Twins Chelsea & Sadie Rose 2026 Victoria, BC YouTube video by James Neilson

Sadie Rose Neilson #4 - 5'6"
Chelsea Neilson #8 - 5'9"
Claremont Sr. Spartans 2026 Victoria BC.
4.0 GPA
NXTUP 17U AAU - Vancouver BC

youtu.be/26b1rH7eSnA?...

Identical twin guards who take care of the ball & play seamlessly off each other. Smooth catch-and-shoot triples and lockdown defence.

1 year ago 2 0 0 0

Amazing 3 point shooting coach. Looks like your shooters tore that 2-3 zone up. How many were under a decent close out?

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Sr HS Girls Game.
Total Hustle Plays = 61
End Result W 63-39. Outwork them!

Q1 14 = 7 dfls, 5 steals 1 block 1 loose ball dive
Q2 16 = 8 dfls 7 steals 1 block
Q3 14 = 5 dfls 6 steals 3 blocks
Q4 17 = 11 dfls 6 steals

Results

Q1 L 13-14
Q2 W 20-10
Q3 W 14-4
Q4 W 16-11

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Rick Pitino still cherishes one stat above others The Louisville coach judges his players' efforts based on how many deflections they accumulate.

Been tracking "hustle" plays like Rick Pitino.

sports.yahoo.com/ncaab--rick-...

What happens when you keep track of how hard you play every quarter?

Chart the steals, blocks, loose ball dives, charges taken and deflections. If you're getting 12 or more per quarter you tend to win.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

16U Girls AAU team struggling to defend dribble drive.
191/884 or 21% of all points scored against.

Stats showed us a problem to fix.

Cause? Poke and reach defenders hunting steals, but not moving their feet. Bigs slow to move into help allowing the drive to get to the hoop.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

The math ain't mathin' on midrange when we tracked it for 34 Junior Girls games.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

What application are you using to track this?

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

If my math is mathin' right here getting 1 touch and 1 reversal is 38% more PPP. There's got to be at least 8-10 points more per game if you can collapse the D and move the ball more.

Only two turnovers from these actions and neither related to the PT or the REV action.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

The results were clear.

.81 PPP with no touches or reversals
1.125 PPP with 1 touch and 1 reversal.
1.5 PPP with 0 PT and 2 REV

Collapse the D and disorganize them with movement.

Like @brianmccormick.bsky.social says in his book SABA, get those Small Advantages to get Big Advantages.

1 year ago 0 1 1 0
Post image

Used a simple chart tracking 0-2 paint touches and 0-2 reversals, makes or misses and shot clock time taken.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Needed a way to track Paint Touches and Reversals, so I modified the Basketball on Paper shorthand by analytics wizard @deanolytics.bsky.social adding markers for PT and REV to track the 46 1/2 court possessions.

Now let's math this all up.

1 year ago 1 0 1 1

Sr. Girls HS Basketball and taking a look at the impact of paint touches and ball reversals on PPP (points per possession).

46/81 possessions were 1/2 court
42/63 points scored came from 1/2 court action

Are we more efficient scorers if we touch paint or move the ball? How to study this?

1 year ago 0 0 1 0