Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Joe Poulin

Yes, as I said, that probably makes sense if you don’t know what “respectability” means?

If you do know what the word means, it’s obviously not true, of course.

9 minutes ago 0 0 0 0

Yeah, for some reason tuna melt works just fine.

54 minutes ago 0 0 0 0

Nope! That’s only if you don’t know what “respectability” means.

Knowing that someone is dumb, and a liar, and has no experience has nothing to do with appearances, it has to do with qualification for the job.

Are you sure you don’t just like being pointlessly contrarian?

59 minutes ago 0 0 1 0

Well, you can pretend that’s true if it’s easier than thinking about the things he’s said? It will probably feel comforting.

1 hour ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Me: adverts don't work on me, show what you want, I won't click it, won't buy it, won't fall for it.
The internet: Hi Jo, have you seen this cardie?
Me: click, click, click, click, click

3 hours ago 174 16 9 0

The correlation there didn’t occur to him.

It’s another example of Everyone Is 12 Theory. Cool uniforms are neato and tactical! Mom telling you to get your vaccination is like totally fascism*!

*but not the kind of fascism they like

1 hour ago 0 0 0 0

I highly doubt they said anything about “respectability”. You’re probably talking about the way Nazi Tattoo guy kept saying how much he’d have loved to take part in genocidal wars of conquest, or says he’s a big fan of a white supremacist podcaster.

That isn’t about “respectability” at all.

1 hour ago 0 0 2 0

Okay, so you came into the thread to argue against a point nobody was making and is completely irrelevant.

That’s why you had to spend so much time saying that you didn’t mean the words in your posts, people assumed you were trying to address the conversation.

1 hour ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

So your repeated claims that it doesn’t matter that he’s either stupid, or stupid and lying, because that’s just “respectability” are very suspicious. Especially when you continue to ignore the whole voting for Republicans thing.

Do you have some tattoos you don’t want people to ask about?

2 hours ago 0 0 1 0

Okay? But literally no one cares about “respectability”. Everyone is talking about the guy with the Nazi tattoo who is either so stupid he had it for decades and never figured out what it was, or at best, thought Nazi imagery was fun to play with.

2 hours ago 0 0 2 0

A) Not an answer to the question.

B) And again with the “I didn’t say the words in my post!”

bsky.app/profile/scot...

2 hours ago 0 0 1 0

What is this “wrong rock” mantra you all keep repeating?
Is it a spell that keeps you from understanding what people are saying about LLMs so you don’t have to admit they can’t do something?

3 hours ago 0 0 0 0

No? I said the words that I said, not the words that you have a script for arguing with and would prefer I were saying.

9 hours ago 0 0 0 0

No, I wasn’t confused.

9 hours ago 0 0 0 0

No, it’s the standard, “locution”.

And also no, if you had ever met any human children, you’d be aware that they don’t learn the way LLMs do.

9 hours ago 0 0 0 0

horseshoe theory is real. leftists almost got kat abughazaleh elected into congress and now it comes out that her boyfriend owns infowars…

23 hours ago 5830 757 11 38
Advertisement

Okay, but the Boston Museum of Science is legit the bomb. Love that place.

15 hours ago 0 0 0 0
A still from the show Elementary. Joan Watson (Lucy Liu) in a sleeveless white top with round black buttons, and Johnny Lee Miller as Sherlock in a dark suit and light grey shirt buttoned-up to the neck.

A still from the show Elementary. Joan Watson (Lucy Liu) in a sleeveless white top with round black buttons, and Johnny Lee Miller as Sherlock in a dark suit and light grey shirt buttoned-up to the neck.

Just watched my 154th and final episode of Elementary. Despite its flaws - some dull/daft cases (hazard of all procedurals), some dropped story threads and disappearing characters, Liu and Miller were always great, and great together. Probably my favourite version of the Holmes/Watson partnership.

1 day ago 241 18 16 18

Damnit, sometimes it’s frustrating being on the side that actually cares about “reliable sources” or “truth”.

15 hours ago 1 0 1 0

Good lord, are you aware that you said this using your outside voice? People can hear you.

15 hours ago 5 0 0 0

Hey now, I was with you up until now.

This is a step too far.

15 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Well, I guess comedy isn’t actual legal again on Twitter.

15 hours ago 2 0 0 0

Evelyn (the private citizen, not the Dem politician) is reaching or at the point where her sign says “John Brown was right” or “The judgements of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.” bless her heart.

16 hours ago 6 0 1 0

Whey, I’m not even an attorney and I know Stepehen’s answer for this.

The law and rules must protect fascists, while they must bind the rest of us. The Federalist Society has no other beliefs.

16 hours ago 4 0 0 0

Don’t worry, everyone, Stephen isn’t actually stupid enough to believe this nonsense about it being bad that people know Roberts rules based on political concerns.

He’s the Scalia chair law prof at Harvard, it’s his job to lie on behalf of un-American and unconstitutional bullshit like this.

16 hours ago 4 0 0 0

Godamnit.

16 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Don’t forget the talk about how much he would have loved to have fought on the imperialist side in historical wars of genocide and conquest.

That’s always a sign of someone you should trust with high office.

16 hours ago 2 0 0 0

Good thing I didn’t say anything about “I trust the Republicans” then, isn’t it? Or “people should trust the Republicans”.

16 hours ago 1 0 0 0

And before you try, “that isn’t what I said” again, I remind you of:

bsky.app/profile/scot...

16 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Okay, so would you say that when you advocate voting for a weirdo who previously voted Republican, we can’t tell whether that is better or worse than voting for Democrats?

16 hours ago 0 0 2 0