You don't need to wait, his handpicked Home Secretary told you their policies are the exact opposite of this earlier in the Conference.

Or at least before his Home Secretary announced policies that were the complete opposite of the therefore demonstrable shite he'd be spouting in his own speech.

So what time is he sacking the Home Secretary he just appointed and whose policy announced at this same event is the complete opposite of the words he just spouted?

Are we just pretending the Home Secretary's speech at this same event didn't happen now?

Those garden party invites don't send themselves.

This is Starmer at his best, making a speech in complete contradiction to the speech already made at the same event by his Home Secretary.

My bad. Clapping like a stupid person incapable of having a memory of longer than 24 hours.

And all you have to do is completely ignore his Home Secretary's speech from all the way back to... oh, yesterday to believe it.

In fairness members of our esteemed press had their nightly smack around the head with a frying pan between the two speeches.

You should have a word with your home secretary mate she’s introducing free forced labour for migrants

I like that he waited until after his Home Secretary announced this party's policy that is the exact opposite of the speech he'd written and you're clapping like a moron at.

Hello to all the people quoting this post when Alex is inevitably telling you to 'tactically' vote for the Starmer Party at the next general election.

The people that bang on about only voting for “serious politics” are the same people that have to use a special website to tell them how who they should vote for

Lewis is a Tony Blair Institute employee's bit of rough.

Have you considered not being utterly shit at your job, Lewis?

It's interesting who can make direct reference to an infamous racist speech and be given the benefit of the doubt and who can be held responsible for every wayward action of their alleged supporters on social media.

"We told you to vote in such a way that this party would have a triple figure majority to do as they like, with the proviso of a campaign for electoral reform that we abandoned the day after the election, and they've used it to do what they've spent the last decade saying they'd do by mistake"

You got what you voted for.

You've got to fill your time not talking about the government you support targeting disabled people with something, Ian.

I got to 'that there would be cuts to disability benefits' before I guffawed. Alec, are you genuinely telling us that there are no cuts to benefits being proposed here? Come on, own that ridiculous claim.

You got what you voted for.

"Totally that because they dont believe in these conditions"

Whereas your party believe they're overdiagnosed and people just don't have them.

Which bits did the media make up then Alec?

Saying nothing seems to have lead to you supporting this bunch of wankers into government so it's not a tactic that comes with a glowing endorsement.

Rachel "Tougher than the Tories on welfare" Reeves was definitely Shadow Chancellor when you walked into that voting booth last July. So it's absolutely what you voted for.

You winning yet son?

No chance, the campaign for PR that got going the morning of July 5th last year will have turned Starmer into a PR advocate long before the next election. You know the one that was part of the reason for telling people they needed to hold their noses and vote Starmer? No? Oh.

It's the policy of the country's Health Secretary that you all voted for last summer, what can I say?

Can't believe the party putting up Rachel "Tougher than the Tories on welfare" Reeves as Chancellor that you backed wholeheartedly are being tougher than the Tories on welfare. Who could have possibly seen that coming?