Graphic with a dark blue background titled “2024 U.S. General Election Analysis: Minnesota Then and Now – Key Findings” from the Election Truth Alliance (logo shows a ballot box with a checkmark).
Text highlights three claims:
Clean Baseline: The 1984 Minnesota election is described as a hand-counted baseline with no signs of large-scale vote manipulation.
Clear Contrast Then to Today: Elections in 2016, 2020, and 2024 are said to show a strong relationship between turnout and candidate support, contrasted with 1984.
Controlling for Social and Electoral Factors: The relationship between turnout and vote share remains significant even after adjusting for demographic and electoral variables.
Footer reads: “ElectionTruthAlliance.org,” with red and yellow accent stripes at the top and bottom.
Graphic with a dark blue background titled “2024 U.S. General Election Analysis: Minnesota Then and Now – Key Findings,” from the Election Truth Alliance (logo with a ballot box and checkmark).
Section header reads “The anomalies include:” followed by two bullet points:
Vote share distributions: Described as close to normal in 1984 but increasingly skewed in 2016, 2020, and 2024, claimed to show a “vote manipulation signature” and a major deviation from normal voting behavior.
Uniform turnout to vote share correlations: Described as turnout and vote share for one party rising together across polling stations, suggested as possible evidence of coordinated intervention inflating results.
Footer reads “ElectionTruthAlliance.org,” with red and yellow accent stripes at the top and bottom.
Graphic with a dark blue header reading “Election Truth Alliance – 2024 U.S. General Election Analysis.” Centered is a solid blue silhouette of the state of Minnesota outlined in red, with the word “Minnesota” in yellow across it and a small Election Truth Alliance logo inside the state shape.
A white background sits behind the map, and a dark blue footer reads “Minnesota Then and Now.” Red and yellow accent stripes run along the top and bottom edges.
We compared 40 years of Minnesota Presidential election data going all the way back to 1984, before "vote-counting computers" were widely used.
What did we find?
