They are not endangered here, they are considered a pest.

Youre welcome to some of ours. The damn dogs bring them in and drop them on the floor.

Women are taught to “cover up” and feel shame about their bodies. Naturism is letting go of that fear and standing in your own confidence. Your body is part of who you are—nothing to hide. Thousands of women stand with you around the world.
— Alice de Wet, President of
@gonatural.bsky.social

Here, merely being naked does not constitute and offense. Hence you can be naked in the yard, walk naked in the woods, swim naked off any beach. All perfectly legal. I live next door to a school and they are fine with it.

I would have thought so. I dont know your law but here if you agree to be interviewed you are giving tacit ownership of the material to the interviewer.

Really, not even in the terms and conditions of engagement?

I would have assumed that a release was obtained at the time of recording. It's normal practice. Thus its their property that they can use as they wish

We certainly agree on that front. One reason I no longer visit the US is their attitude to nudity. If I walk down the street in spain or the UK im not breaking any laws

I not sure how you stretch to misogyny but one thing most of the comments and attitudes posted across multiple sites certainly convince me that europe has a far more civilised attitude.

Is this more than heresy

As far as I can see these are assertions only. Given they assertion made by one of the parties they hold no weight unless proven.

Finally catching up on some gardening

Yes would happily say to someone's face. I tend not to have to because I live in a civilised country that tend not to descend to degenerate statements.

I never said there wasnt but merely questioned the motivation. That said, surely using NNN to promote yourselves then subsequently trashing them on multiple levels does put into question your ethics. Particularly as the events are somewhat interleaved

Then later you return to what was a throw away statement, that im yet to locate and do a complete about face. Is that not duplicitous?

Seems to me at some point you've sold your soul and a jumping to the tune of the organ grinder.

I guess that depends on a definition of many. From my listening, they subsequently promoted YOUR concert a few times on their show - I am guessing that you asked them to do so - and then they devoted nearly an entire show on Episode 130 to read, discuss, and support your rules for your concert.

I've re-listened to an awful lot. Despite the statements, I'm left with a question. If episode of 92 was such a major issue to Gabby, why would you return in episode 130? Does not make sense at all. Unless its an externally manufactured or driven situation.

I appreciate your opinion, I certainly not American, while I did briefly live there, I certainly do not understand the culture and quite frankly glad I chose to leave. My view if the world in certainly antipodean and my history distinctly European.

I'll listen again but I'm not sure I'll agree.

They certainly have loyalty and commitment, I'm just not sure what too.

Possibly but why walk away from AANR? Unless its irrelevant to her.

However you comment so extensively about you "Brand", I assume your concern is more fiscally based than an ethical one.

This does make me question your commitment to naturism. To walk away from AANR over something that you alledge occured and of this nature seems at minimum to petty. Surely your contribution is more important?

Following your comment I went to see what questionable comments they have been making, so far to no avail. Please enlighten me as to where I may find them.

It would appear to me of late, your tone has changed. The acceptance and non-partisanship i would expect from a true naturist is abscent. Surely this mean many things you post are regrettable.

You still working atm

Good and you.

26 here in mangaroa Valley but humidity is low.

Always

Sent a DM with the email