Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Scott O'Hara

One of its greatest flaws

1 week ago 0 0 0 0

Smart

I wish though that calling out someone as making bullshit statements wasn’t rebutted with “you’re being mean by calling out that I d ok not know what I’m talking about”

1 week ago 1 0 1 0

Shouting sounds fine to me.

Statement like that are bullshit and shouldn’t be made. Full stop.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

thanks for posting that.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

“If they (screen readers) wanted to”

I hate statements like this, as if the people making screen readers should be expected to find this sort of info that is not included in the a11y tree

1 week ago 4 0 1 0

It’s today again.

2 weeks ago 2 0 2 0
Preview
Automated WCAG Testing Is Grrreat! I’m a big fan of using automation in WCAG testing. I use bookmarklets, dev tools, browser features & reporting, and a pile of third-party products from assorted vendors. These save me time and effort,...

The Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force has published its rules, letting you filter automated rules:
www.w3.org/WAI/standard...

It’s only partial coverage of 31% of SCs:
adrianroselli.com/2025/04/auto...

Automation is good, but limited. Understand those limits.

#accessibility #a11y

1 month ago 13 9 0 0

would love for the family of input buttons type=button,submit,reset,image to be made obsolete

1 month ago 6 0 1 1
Advertisement

When your experience of the web has only been visual, it's really easy to say that the underlying code doesn't matter.

1 month ago 102 26 3 1
Video

Initial prototype of a `<toolbar>` element is coming along. Largely piggybacks off the focusgroup code so it's actually quite simple to do.

Lots to discuss and tweak before it's finished but got to start somewhere.

1 month ago 69 14 4 0

2/2

(Important note: it is a draft, far from completed, and we have lots of work planned. Feedback is welcomed!)

1 month ago 2 2 1 0
W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0 W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0 will provide a wide range of recommendations for making web content more accessible to users with disabilities. Following these guidelines will address many of ...

The latest Working Draft of WCAG 3 is out today! w3.org/TR/wcag3/

In this version, we've:
- moved lots of requirements to “Developing” phase,
- wrote down how to test,
- mapped reqs to user needs (using DAF),
- split out 'applies when' and 'except when' to massively increase readability
1/2

1 month ago 34 11 1 0

“Shouldn’t”

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

there are UX challenges to solve with making sure users can effectively reach the different sections of parallel content (dialogs or not).

solvable, but not with truly "modal" dialogs. since that's in opposition to what "modal" means.

1 month ago 2 0 0 0

heh... fwiw i don't think any of the use cases that have been called out are a11y blackholes.

there are valid use cases for dialogs that are fully modal, and for non-modal dialogs (standard or popover) that need to be used in parallel with other content that may or may not be inert.

1 month ago 2 0 1 0

which is what a ctrl + f6 command to navigate between dialogs could be useful for - but then users need to be made aware that exists...

tldr; it's not as simple as it's being made out to be, which i understand may be due to limited characters per messages... i'm mean, i'm bored of typing now too

1 month ago 3 0 0 0

so in those cases, the only way one might know that other content exists outside of the dialog is to try and tab out of the dialog to find it...

but users shouldn't be able to tab out of dialogs...

1 month ago 1 0 2 1

from my experiences, this is the best method to ensure users will be consistently aware that a toast popup is rendered, since some screen readers (nvda for example) will constrain element navigation to the dialog - even modeless.

1 month ago 2 0 1 0
Advertisement

I appreciate linkedin continuously sending me emails that people are waiting for my response, because it means I’ll always have some email to delete when I open my inbox.

1 month ago 3 0 0 0

shooogar?

1 month ago 1 0 1 0

sugar?

1 month ago 1 0 1 0

DID YOU TAKE ERIC'S MEMORIES!?!?!

1 month ago 1 0 1 0

Just had to remind myself that 2024 was not last year

Pros/cons to that reminder….

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

lol. I know

2 months ago 1 0 1 0

As a matter of fact, no.

2 months ago 2 0 1 0

Looks like you’re trying to create an emoji face. Can clippy help you finish that?

2 months ago 4 0 1 0

A standardized in-page calendar would take care of one of the most difficult aspects of custom pickers and allow for more flexibility in their presentation.

Don’t need to make a standardized dual range picker popup if you can make a button to invoke a dialog with two calendars jn it.

2 months ago 8 0 1 0
Advertisement

Funny that, a control that behaves as a button but is not exposed as a button would make it so some AT didn’t know how to interact with it….

Whodathunk

2 months ago 4 0 1 0

also. 10 years ago.... yeesh....

2 months ago 2 0 0 0
(Navigation) Landmark Discoverability | scottohara.me I want to talk about some great advice tweeted by @heydonworks:

this reminds me of when me, you and heydon were talking about exactly this, on twitter, back in 2016
www.scottohara.me/blog/2016/08...

2 months ago 5 1 1 0