Thanks for reading!
The full article is open access here:
📄 doi.org/10.1080/2040...
For folks working on satire, emotion, or media trust — let’s talk!
#ComedyStudies #PoliticalCommunication #LateNight #Colbert #AffectiveShifts
Posts by Andreas Kraxberger
AFS help political comedy adapt to a media system where trust in news is low and emotions are high.
These moments aren't just cathartic — they’re persuasive.
They redefine what comedy can do in times of crisis and the future role of political comedy.
In Colbert’s Jan 7 monologue, the most egregious example in our dataset, we found 4 distinct AFS:
He moves from jokes to visible anger and moral outrage.
He names names. He critiques institutions.
Then he returns to levity — giving the audience space to feel and process.
🔍 AFS are more than tonal shifts. They allow comedians to:
1. Voice critique without trivializing
2. Build trust via expressing emotion (pathos + ethos)
3. Frame events like journalists (attribute agenda setting)
Comedy, in short, becomes a form of opinionated journalism.
We studied how Late Night comedians use AFS during crisis events (Jan 6, Covid, Roe v. Wade etc).
📺 Shows: Colbert, Meyers, Noah
📊 Methods: Sentiment analysis (N=14,451 sentences) + case study of Colbert’s Jan 7 monologue.