Unterkünfte für Wohnungslose sollen verhindern, dass Menschen auf der Straße landen. Recherchen von Anna Thewalt und mir zeigen, dass aus diesen Wohnheimen in Berlin ein lukratives Geschäft geworden ist. Ein Sozialstadtrat spricht von einer „Goldgrube“. Unsere Recherche im @tagesspiegel.de:
For folks (and journalists) who want to search the Oversight Committee email texts, I made a database for searching the 20k text files:
splendorous-chaja-f79791.netlify.app
hire all the fired political teen vogue writers and make a new magazine call teen rogue.
we’ll all subscribe en masse
Erinnert ihr euch noch an #wiesmarties? www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/e...
Das HB schreibt in einem Text zum gleichen Thema: je konservativer die (westlich geprägte) Gesellschaft, also je traditioneller die Geschlechterrollen, desto niedriger die Geburtenrate. Allerdings hätte ich da gerne konkrete Zahlen statt Beispiele gesehen www.handelsblatt.com/politik/konj...
Interessant! Warum?
Seit heute macht das Gerücht die Runde, die SPD könnte Katarina Barley als Kandidatin fürs Bundesverfassungsgericht nominieren. Seit heute gibt es eine Ergänzung in ihrem Wikipedia-Eintrag zu ihrer Position zu Schwangerschaftsabbrüchen - von einem anonymen Account, der extra dafür angelegt wurde.
As of late last month, the investigation—led by US senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat of Georgia—had unearthed 41 cases of physical and sexual abuse; 14 involving pregnant detainees and 18 involving children.
👉 Come work for @wired.com features team in NYC! Must have experience with big stories and a desire to have fun while holding tech leaders to account! Best in business, etc.! Ping me with questions condenast.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/CondeCareers...
President @realDonaldTrump showing President Zelenskyy and President Macron his 4 More Years hat 🤣🇺🇸
Showing the endangered leader of an invaded country my hats
This is so on the nose I don't even know what to say.
Patrick Bahners nailed it. Dass man aus dieser selbst gestellten Falle nicht mehr herauskam, ist umso bedenklicher.
It is no accident that the early use cases for "genAI" consumer products revolve around the sexual harassment, abuse, and exploitation of women in power. It is no accident that the technology is immediately embraced as a tool of patriarchy and gender-based violence.
www.theverge.com/report/71897...
Ist Steffen S. ein Einzelfall?Wir haben alle Finanzgerichte & Finanzministerien gefragt, uns mit Verfassungsschützern Ermittlerinnen, Finanzbeamt:innen und Staatsanwälten in ganz 🇩🇪 getroffen.
Einge schätzen: Fast keine:r der 26.000 Reichsbürger:innen zahlt Steuern,das sei "Ideologie-immanent" 2/6
Bei @journalist.de gibt es jetzt einen Leitfaden für Journalist:innen zur Berichterstattung über Polizei und Kriminalität der viele Probleme in diesem Kontext adressiert. www.journalist.de/werkstatt/we...
Every. Single. Story. about women not using AI as much as men portray it as bad for their future career prospects (without a shred of evidence) and a result of women being fearful little ladies rather than looking at AI's output and saying "this sucks, it's not going to help me."
A newspaper wrecked on purpose.
huge W for the patriarchalists. Lockeans and Hobbiesians in utter shambles
Wenn ihr nur einen Text lesen und teilen wollt, der - analytisch & kommentierend - die Causa Brosius-Gersdorf aufdröselt und dabei auch zum Denken anregt, dann würde sich dieser von @dieterschnaas.bsky.social extrem gut eignen:
www.wiwo.de/politik/deut...
There is no such thing as liberalism — or progressivism, etc. There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation. There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely. Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. “The king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual. As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself — backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.
So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone. Then the appearance arises that the task is to map “liberalism”, or “progressivism”, or “socialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism. No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get: The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.
I think it's now possible to make a poli-sci course that equips one for modern political analysis better than most classic theory and has a syllabus sourced entirely from random internet posts.
Text 1. Wilhoit's Law, born as part of a 2018 blog comment
crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/l...
Infographic titled “One Court, Two Standards” compares how the Supreme Court used emergency powers to rule on lower-court injunctions against the Biden and Trump administrations. Two panels show: • Biden Administration: Lower courts blocked policies in 21 cases. All 21 cases are represented by red squares, indicating that 0% of injunctions/TROs were lifted by SCOTUS. • Trump Administration: Lower courts blocked policies in 86 cases. 66 green squares and 20 red squares show that 77% of injunctions/TROs were lifted by SCOTUS. Key takeaway box below reads: “Using its ‘shadow docket,’ the Supreme Court granted emergency relief to lift 77% of lower-court injunctions against the Trump administration. It lifted 0% of those against the Biden administration.” Sources and notes below include: CourtListener data through July 7, 2025; analysis by Adam Bonica.
The Supreme Court’s “shadow docket” has cast very different shadows depending on which party holds the White House.
When lower courts blocked Trump admin policies, SCOTUS intervened on an emergency basis to lift those orders in 77% of cases.
For the Biden administration, that number was 0%.
Read news, op-eds, and analysis, not AI summaries. Create your own art (even if it's messy) or hire an artist to do it. Do your own homework. Talk to people, not chatbots. Keep your thinking and skills sharp and cherish our messy humanity. That's the new punk rock.
„Über einen Abend, der zeigt, was im Osten ohne Unvereinbarkeitsbeschluss möglich wäre.“
Auch der Tagesspiegel berichtet über die gemeinsame Doppel-Buchvorstellung und Diskussion mit #MarioCzaja:
👉 www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/klaus...
@tagesspiegel.de @juliusgeiler.bsky.social
big beautiful bill passing would make the budget for ice larger than most of the world’s militaries
ICEblock, which allows users to alert others to the geographical location of ICE officers, is the top social networking app in the App Store right now after Karoline Leavitt condemned it from the podium yesterday.
"The @NYTimes.com investigation found that U.S. officials have had strong indications for years of the troubling relationship between the Bukele administration and MS-13 and its leaders — and had begun scrutinizing Mr. Bukele himself." www.nytimes.com/2025/06/30/u...
Ungarns Regierung wollte die Pride mit einem queerfeindlichen Gesetz verhindern und Menschen einschüchtern. Der Plan schlägt fehlt. Stattdessen ziehen Hunderttausende gemeinsam durch Budapest – für die Rechte queerer Menschen, aber auch für ihre Demokratie.
netzpolitik.org/2025/rekord-...
A bridge is packed with people, with scattered pride flags in the crowd. A headline reads: "Budapest Pride Parade Was Bigger Than Ever, Despite Government Ban." Photo by Janos Kummer/Getty Images.
More than 100,000 people marched in Hungary’s annual Pride parade in Budapest on Saturday after Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s ban on the event backfired, turning what is usually a low-key parade into a mass rally against his government. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/28/w...