As others have pointed out, they are more likely to come out ahead as a result of this attack in ways useful to them.
Posts by Clairemont
Seems pretty upon and shut to me. Tell me MAGA, is the just Bad Strategic Planning by the Trump Admin or ZERO planning? Looks like Iran had a plan. (I wonder what the plan might have looked like among the Iran experts who were fired.)
Economists:
Oh the joys of unintended consequences (or bad strategic planning) ... the kitten GIF is great.
Just looked at the Jones Act and ... Sheesh!
Don't even know what the the Jones Act is but I know the system in play right now will take a while to correct. ... Off to learn about the Jones Act.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=upJQ...
Brexit, Feudalism, and the New Lords of Collapse
This isn’t just about Britain — it’s a secret message from Jeffrey Epstein, a warning of what lies ahead for all of us at the hands of those who lust for wealth and power.
#Brexit
#EpsteinFiles
#techbros
#endgamecapitalism
Open Letter to Gen X: We Were Taught to Question Power — Not Worship It
www.facebook.com/StackOfStone...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-Z6...
Text on dark background: Halligan admitted to a judge that she presented the court w/ an indictment the grand jury never saw. Greg Bovino, Chief of the Border Patrol, admitted to lying to a judge about the sequence of events during a protest where tear gas was used. (The behavior undermining his testimony was caught on tape.) Judges can no longer presume attorneys for the Trump administration are telling the truth due to multiple instances of misrepresentation and lying. Bondi said there was no there there and the case was closed, and now because it suits Trump, there's a case against Democrats only. Yet, Bondi expects us to believe her word that the DOJ will follow the law re the Epstein files. Really? Where's the evidence that we can trust a damn thing anyone in this Trump Administration says?
When you watch Tucker Carlson, do you see someone who attend the Sesame School of Acting.
I keep seeing him as one of their characters if their goal was promoting evil with a smile.
Okay thanks. I was hoping you meant that. My mind doesn't read the two statements as the same in that I see a distinction, but I thought perhaps you might what the meme is making clear. I appreciate your hanging in there with me.
Indeed... that's the point. You could acknowledge that in this situation the BBC wasn't far right enough for the powerful elite.
Monbiot nails it. The BBC isn’t punished for challenging power—it’s punished for not reinforcing it completely. Gaza. Trans rights. Trump. The pattern’s clear: media that fails to serve as a full-time shield for elite narratives gets sacrificed. Not for truth. For optics.
Monbiot nails it. The BBC isn’t punished for challenging power—it’s punished for not reinforcing it completely. Gaza. Trans rights. Trump. The pattern’s clear: media that fails to serve as a full-time shield for elite narratives gets sacrificed. Not for truth. For optics.
The BBC didn’t just cut a line from Trump’s Jan 6 speech. They cut themselves out of the fight. Saying “peacefully” doesn’t erase months of incitement or armed intent. Resigning wasn’t accountability. It was submission dressed as neutrality.
Once every 20 years or so, the director-general of the BBC is forced to resign for being insufficiently rightwing. Alastair Milne in 1987. Greg Dyke in 2004. Tim Davie in 2025. The great irony is that the BBC was in all cases profoundly biased towards established power. But just not biased enough …
The BBC didn’t just cut a line from Trump’s Jan 6 speech. They cut themselves out of the fight. Saying “peacefully” doesn’t erase months of incitement or armed intent. Resigning wasn’t accountability. It was submission dressed as neutrality.
Absolutely. The BBC didn’t just cut a line from Trump’s Jan 6 speech. They cut themselves out of the fight. Saying “peacefully” doesn’t erase months of incitement or armed intent. Resigning wasn’t accountability. It was submission dressed as neutrality.
The BBC didn’t just cut a line from Trump’s Jan 6 speech. They cut themselves out of the fight. Saying “peacefully” doesn’t erase months of incitement or armed intent. Resigning wasn’t accountability. It was submission dressed as neutrality.
I understand your upset and the BBC just caved to Trump. Saying “peacefully” doesn’t erase months of incitement or armed intent. Resigning wasn’t accountability. It was submission dressed as neutrality.
But resign over pressure that distorts the reality of Trump's intent? Criticise him for what he deserves criticism for, but this is not it.
The BBC didn’t just cut a line from Trump’s Jan 6 speech. They cut themselves out of the fight. Saying “peacefully” doesn’t erase months of incitement or armed intent. Resigning wasn’t accountability. It was submission dressed as neutrality.
The BBC didn’t just cut a line from Trump’s Jan 6 speech. They cut themselves out of the fight. Saying “peacefully” doesn’t erase months of incitement or armed intent. Resigning wasn’t accountability. It was submission dressed as neutrality.
I'm trying to understand your statement. Can you let me know if my meme is consistent with it?
Did you mean to say: "democrats are institutionally reliant on the insistence that liberal centrism is the only alternative to fascism"? That's quite different from what you said.
Remembering my friend and mentor, Senator Paul Wellstone. “I represent the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party.”