We’re seeking research across three priorities:
▶️Actors — leadership structures, recruitment, organizational networks
▶️Tactics — AI, drones, and emerging technologies
▶️Targets — border security, event venues, and critical infrastructure
#ncite #researchfunding
📢 NCITE is accepting project proposals for its 2026–2027 research year!
Full details: www.unomaha.edu/ncite/reques...
Key deadlines:
▶️White Papers due March 23, 2026
▶️Full Proposals (select applicants) due May 8, 2026
2️⃣ “Multivocality Use by Extremist Ideological Groups on Digital Platforms", by Ares Boira-Lopez & colleagues
📱 Extremists use multivocal messaging across platforms — less trustworthy, but more memorable & shared more often
🔗 www.igi-global.com/gateway/arti...
#Counterterrorism #NCITE
📰 Two new publications from the NCITE team:
1️⃣ “Introducing the LEADIR Dataset”, by
@ginaligon.bsky.social
Michael K. Logan, & Mackenzie Harms, published in
Perspectives on Terrorism
📊 An open-source dataset of 280 terrorist groups & 295 leaders (2008–2017)
🔗 pt.icct.nl/article/intr...
Want to understand 764 better? Dive into these resources from NCITE:
🎧 Youth Recruitment & Mobilization – youtu.be/zDQ9g7wB1ao?...
🎧 Old Threats & New: ISIS & 764 – youtu.be/5KLGas6PDFE?...
Thanks to Quanecia Fraser for the excellent coverage and credit to FBI Omaha's Eugene Kowel.
🚨 NCITE’s Bettina Rottweiler, Ph.D., appeared on
@ketv7.bsky.social to discuss “764”, a dangerous decentralized online extremist network that targets youth for self-harm, abuse, and violence.
📺 Watch the segment: www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TdS...
More NCITE malign AI research:
📄 Case study for practitioners (led by NCITE's Emma Theobald): digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcont...
📚 Amplifying malevolent creativity (led by NCITE's Alexis d’Amato): psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...
🎧 Podcast episode: www.podbean.com/ew/pb-agsb2-...
📰 New feature — NCITE’s Sam Hunter, senior scientist and director of academic research, spoke with @newsweek.com
about how terrorist groups like ISIS are exploring AI for harm: newsweek.com/isis-ai-terr...
The terrorism landscape has evolved in the 24 years since, with advances in technology and shifting ideologies reshaping how the U.S. and allies combat and protect against threats. For the full research paper on ISIS, click here: digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcont...
We also reviewed the time, nature, and sentencing of the charges:
• U.S. Defendants ranged from 17 – 56 years old with an average of 27 years
• Of 263 defendants, 219 were U.S. citizens or permanent legal residents
• A majority were male
• 217 were found guilty or pled guilty
With that mission in mind, we are releasing new research entitled, “Homegrown: U.S. Federal Cases Against ISIS”. We reviewed thousands of court records and identified 263 individuals that have been federally charged with ISIS-related crimes since 2014.
Today we mourn the lives lost on Sept. 11 and the countless other victims of terrorist attacks since that tragic day. NCITE was established in 2020 to help policymakers, practitioners, and the public better understand the nature of terrorist threats to the United States homeland.
The two discuss their research into the similarities and differences in 1) the scholarship on, 2) the public conceptualization of, and 3) the public attitudes toward punishment for terrorism, hate crimes, and other forms of mass violence.
🎙 NCITE Insights No. 37 — Public Perceptions of Punishment for Mass Violence
Ben sits down with NCITE researcher @kearnserinm.bsky.social, Ph.D., and visiting scholar Adam Ghazi-Tehrani, Ph.D., to discuss their research into public attitudes toward punishment for forms of mass violence.
Adam Ghazi-Tehrani sits on a couch in the foreground with Ben Battafarano sitting on an adjacent couch looking at him.
A group of NCITE staff and students sits and listens to Professor Ghazi-Tehrani speak.
💡NCITE visiting scholar Adam Ghazi-Tehrani, Ph.D., professor at Indiana University Bloomington, chatted with NCITE students during a lunch and learn today. They discussed Ghazi-Tehrani's research abroad, advice and career paths for those in graduate school, and much more.
Read the full piece ⤵️
thehill.com/policy/natio...
Check out the latest NCITE publication on threats to public officials from Hughes and Pete Simi ⤵️
digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcont...
“That has a chilling effect on democracy,” Hughes said.
Hughes described the impact of threats to local officials: "They don’t know who to call…they don’t know what to do when they’re doxxed, and maybe they don’t raise their hand next time to run for office, because it’s not worth the hassle and trouble and threats."
Today marks the first anniversary of the assassination attempt on President Trump during an open-air campaign rally outside Butler, P.A. NCITE's @seamushughes.bsky.social spoke with The Hill reporter @byellalee.bsky.social to discuss NCITE research on trends of threats to public officials.
NCITE Research Associate Michael Becker published an article about gamified media literacy in the most recent issue of the Journal for Deradicalization.
Read the article ⤵️
journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php...
Read the report ⤵️
pt.icct.nl/article/inve...
Read more research on IEDs ⤵️
digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcont...
digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcont...
A pie chart with the information listed in the Tweet.
Most terrorist IED plots are foiled. 80% of plots were foiled while around 9% of plots failed and nearly 11% of plots were successful.
Teenagers have also been defendants in terrorist IED incidents. The authors write, "Three out of the four teen-related cases have occurred since 2023, highlighting the growing increase and worsening pattern of youth and juvenile mobilisation to acts of terrorism."
A table about defendants in federal charges associated with terrorist IED incidents in the U.S. from 2009-2024 with male and female categories, as well as age categories. The male category had 104 defendants while 6 are included in the female category. Ages 15-20 had 24 defendants, 21-20 had 44 defendants, 31-40 had 21 defendants, 41-50 had 12 defendants, 51-60 had 6 defendants, 61-70 had 2 defendants, and 71-75 had 1 defendant.
The defendants in IED cases tend to be younger men. The average age of defendants is 31, and they are overwhelmingly men, with six cases involving women and 104 cases involving men.
A bar chart showing the number of cases per year separated by ideology.
IED incidents involving different extremist ideologies differs every year. Radical Jihadist affiliated incidents decreased from 2019 to 2023 but increased in 2024. Additionally, there was an increase in anti-institutionalist and REMVE incidents in 2024 compared to previous years.
A bar chart showing the information shared in the post.
There are several terrorist ideologies associated with IED incidents. The most incidents are motivated by radical jihadism, followed by anti-institutionalism, then racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism (REMVE), and then other ideologies.
A bar graph with targets associated with terrorist IED incidents. The most targeted is crowded spaces, followed by unspecified, then critical infrastructure, then government buildings, then place of worship, then law enforcement, then multiple, then public elected official, then military, then educational institution, then private business, then private property.
There is a myriad of targets associated with terrorist IED incidents targeted at different rates. The most targeted area is crowded spaces, followed by unspecified areas, then critical infrastructure, then government buildings, then places of worship. More targets follow.
A bar graph showing PBIED with around 55 cases, Unspecified with around 40 cases, VBIED with around 10 cases, and UxS and Mailed IED with about 3 cases. Unspecified cases include when a plot was foiled in early planning stages and the IED employment method couldn't be identified.
There are several ways in which an IED can be delivered to the target. This includes when the bomber brings the IED to the target (PBIED), using a vehicle to bomb a target (VBEID), mailing an IED to a target (Mailed IED), and using unmanned systems to deliver an IED (UxS).
A map with the distribution of cases in each U.S. state.
Terrorist IED incidents are widespread. From 2009 to 2024, 31 states across the United States had cases of terrorist IED incidents. In the same time period, 22 states had multiple cases of terrorist IED incidents.
