Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by An(drew) McC

wait, fuck, this is gorillaz

1 month ago 13283 3440 50 23
LinkedIn This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn

I am concerned that researchers like me, whose work may be supported by #EPSRC but requires access to #STFC facilities, aren’t talking enough about the impacts that budget cuts will have on our ability to do science. I have written my thoughts down here: mccluskey.scot/2026/03/09/t....

1 month ago 2 1 0 0
Dear Sir Paul,

Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct

I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues.  Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied.  

A 2018 report  from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”.  This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research.  In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research.  For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

Dear Sir Paul, Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues. Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied. A 2018 report from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”. This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research. In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research. For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times  published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””.  Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian  on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. 

I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship.  The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers.  You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”.  Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists.

I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research.  This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. 

Yours sincerely,

Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””. Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship. The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers. You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”. Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists. I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research. This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. Yours sincerely, Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.

3 months ago 814 297 25 29
An Oreo consisting of three black bits and two white centres.

An Oreo consisting of three black bits and two white centres.

Big day for me.

5 months ago 2 0 0 0

*Probably* become a Bayesian…

7 months ago 2 0 1 0
Accurate Estimation of Diffusion Coefficients and their Uncertainties — kinisi 2.0.0 documentation

We have just released kinisi-2.0.0. This new release represents a substantial rewrite of the kinisi package: improving stability, reducing technical debt, and most significantly integrating the scipp library. Check it out for all your diffusion analysis needs! kinisi.readthedocs.io

8 months ago 5 1 0 0
Preview
Computational discovery of novel oxide-based X-ray detectors at University of Birmingham on FindAPhD.com PhD Project - Computational discovery of novel oxide-based X-ray detectors at University of Birmingham, listed on FindAPhD.com

PLEASE REPOST: We have a 4-year, fully funded PhD studentship focussed on using computational chemistry to find new and improved oxides for X-ray detection, to start in October 2025. findaphd.com/phds/project.... This is open only to UK nationals.

8 months ago 8 9 0 0

Can people please stop using black and red symbols to disambiguate different datasets in plots…

9 months ago 2 0 0 0
Promotional image for the Royal Society of Chemistry's Materials Chemistry Poster Symposium, featuring a colourful abstract design, happening on 25 November 2025 in London, UK, with a button to submit an abstract.

Promotional image for the Royal Society of Chemistry's Materials Chemistry Poster Symposium, featuring a colourful abstract design, happening on 25 November 2025 in London, UK, with a button to submit an abstract.

Early career scientists in materials chemistry – join us for an exciting event. Showcase your research in poster and flash presentations, network, enhance your skills and develop your career. Don’t miss out.   Find out more buff.ly/wZKrQIc #ChemSky

10 months ago 5 5 0 0
Advertisement
Illustration of two people, one holding a large pencil, the other walking along a path of diverging arrows. Hedline is "Rules all PIs should follow."

Illustration of two people, one holding a large pencil, the other walking along a path of diverging arrows. Hedline is "Rules all PIs should follow."

#NextGenSci asked young scientists to write a rule that all principal investigators should be required to follow to improve the experience of young scientists in their lab.

Check out their answers on #NationalHigherEducationDay: scim.ag/45zsFEr

10 months ago 129 38 1 11

I am a big Julia fan (though the lack of object orientation slightly breaks my brain whenever I try to use it). The Python in Chemistry community is unfortunately named; we aren't just interested in Python, but keen to develop all "digital skills" in chemistry students.

10 months ago 1 0 1 0

Allow me to correct myself then: Welcome to the *Scottish* Isles chemistry community! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

10 months ago 2 0 0 0

Might have been the raised by Rangers fans coming out…. What is the preferred collective term for these those islands in Ireland? (Asking cause I genuinely thought I had got it right!)

10 months ago 1 0 1 0
Welcome to Python in Chemistry! — Python in Chemistry

Welcome to the British Isles chemistry community! Happy to have another “digital” (broadly defined) chemist around. The pythoninchemistry.org network is always looking for people keen on coding.

10 months ago 3 0 2 0

How munch will Kingsmill/Hovis pay me for the advertising tagline “Live Laugh Loaf”?

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

Great to see Harry’s first paper coming out. Fantastic leadership from Josh to solve this problem (that he had been agonising with for years!).

10 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
On the estimation of center of mass in periodic systems Calculation of the center of mass of a group of particles in a periodically repeating cell is an important aspect of chemical and physical simulations. One popu

Computing the centre of mass of something? You might be doing it wrong. Luckily Harry Richardson, Josh Dunn, and I have some solutions for you. doi.org/10.1063/5.02... #compchem #chemsky

10 months ago 3 1 1 0
Preview
MACE-OFF: Short-Range Transferable Machine Learning Force Fields for Organic Molecules Classical empirical force fields have dominated biomolecular simulations for over 50 years. Although widely used in drug discovery, crystal structure prediction, and biomolecular dynamics, they generally lack the accuracy and transferability required for first-principles predictive modeling. In this paper, we introduce MACE-OFF, a series of short-range transferable force fields for organic molecules created using state-of-the-art machine learning technology and first-principles reference data computed with a high level of quantum mechanical theory. MACE-OFF demonstrates the remarkable capabilities of short-range models by accurately predicting a wide variety of gas- and condensed-phase properties of molecular systems. It produces accurate, easy-to-converge dihedral torsion scans of unseen molecules as well as reliable descriptions of molecular crystals and liquids, including quantum nuclear effects. We further demonstrate the capabilities of MACE-OFF by determining free energy surfaces in explicit solvent as well as the folding dynamics of peptides and nanosecond simulations of a fully solvated protein. These developments enable first-principles simulations of molecular systems for the broader chemistry community at high accuracy and relatively low computational cost.

Now out in @jacs.acspublications.org ! 🎉 : "MACE-OFF: Short-Range Transferable Machine Learning Force Fields for Organic Molecules" by Dávid Kovács, @jhmchem.bsky.social, & team:
pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...

11 months ago 14 5 2 1

Gotcha. mpl-for life ❤️

11 months ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement

What do you mean by “GUI tools vs code based”?

11 months ago 0 0 1 0

Come work with me. It will be fun, I promise!

11 months ago 4 2 0 0
Preview
PhD Stipend/Integrated PhD Stipend In Computational Materials Chemistry A PhD stipend or integrated PhD stipend in computational materials chemistry is available. Development of new sustainable energy materials, including materia...

Open PhD position in computational materials chemistry

As part of my Villum Young Investigator project "Entropy in materials design: Accelerated discovery of disordered solid electrolytes", I am looking for PhD student to join my group.

Please share with anyone interested!

#compchem #chemsky

1 year ago 11 8 0 0
Post image

🚀 First Bluesky Post! 🎉 VMD 2.0 Alpha is here! Released today at BPS 2025, this is the biggest update in 30 years—new UI, real-time ray tracing, fast surfaces, UHD & touchscreen support. Monthly updates coming in 2025! Try it now! #VMD #BPS2025 #MolecularVisualization
www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd...

1 year ago 115 42 3 6
CECAM - Quantum and Mixed Quantum Classical Dynamics in Photochemistry

Less than two weeks left to register for the 2025 CECAM Flagship school in computational photochemistry: shorturl.at/xsbEa with lectures from Basile Curchod, Javier Segarra, Javier Cerezo, Roger Bello and myself. Please spread the word!
#compchem #compchemsky

1 year ago 25 16 0 1

Is there not already a discussion around stopping publishing there over the “Article Development Charge” (fee to submit if you plan to publish open access)?

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

The @acs.org has deleted its website on diversity, equity, inclusion and respect.

www.acs.org/about/divers...

1 year ago 85 72 14 55
Screenshot of the results of a Google search for “when does the six nations start”, showing that the first game is today.

Screenshot of the results of a Google search for “when does the six nations start”, showing that the first game is today.

🏉 🎶 It’s the most wonderful time of the year 🎶 🏉

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
Assistant Professor of Computational Chemistry for Synthesis & Materials at University of Birmingham Start your UK & international job search for academic jobs, research jobs, science jobs and managerial jobs in leading universities and top...

A great new opportunity to join us at Birmingham School of Chemistry. We are looking for a highly talented computational chemist to join our growing community. Deadline February 2.

1 year ago 5 4 0 0
Preview
UKRI is increasing PhD stipends and improving student support UKRI is increasing the minimum stipend we pay PhD students by 8% to £20,780 from 1 October 2025 and updating our doctoral training grant terms and conditions.

YES 👏🏻

1 year ago 2 1 0 0
Advertisement
Lecturer / Senior Lecturer in Physical Chemistry at University of Glasgow An academic position as a Lecturer / Senior Lecturer in Physical Chemistry is being advertised on jobs.ac.uk. Click now to find more details and explore additional academic job opportunities.

The School of Chemistry @uofgchem.bsky.social at the University of Glasgow @uofglasgow.bsky.social is recruiting a permanent lecturer/senior lecturer in Physical Chemistry. Apply by 21 Feb. Come join us!

www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DLQ320/l...

1 year ago 24 16 0 1