Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Henrik Berglund

Med varje ny flashig press-release från Big Tech om deras senaste nya språkmodell kan man lita på att en viss Chalmerskollega får in en alarmistisk debattartikel i svensk dagspress. Givetvis utan kritisk granskning av Techbolagets förenklingar, katastrofscenarier som bara de

1 day ago 4 2 1 0

This worries me most about AI in science. It's what happened with the advent of Stata and SPSS. They enabled incredibly rapid advances in the sciences and also set the stage for the replication crisis. Sadly, so many scientists simply don't understand the stats they are using.

2 weeks ago 103 18 10 5
Post image

And this.

3 weeks ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

From "Momo — oder Die seltsame Geschichte von den Zeit-Dieben und von dem Kind, das den Menschen die gestohlene Zeit zurückbrachte," by Michael Ende.

The best (childrens) book ever.

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0

I don't think it's a named logical fallacy, but there is a type of thinking that has trouble distinguishing "doesn't literally violate the laws of physics" from "should be achievable in a few years with sufficient gumption."

3 weeks ago 93 7 10 0

"A wise general makes sure to insult and humiliate allies before heading into battle"
- Sun Tzu

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility - Wikipedia

Back in the 1980s-2000s, there was an organization called
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility that worked to oppose irresponsible and dangerous uses of computers in warfare. Maybe it needs a reboot, in our new age of AI.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compute...

1 month ago 177 30 8 2

“One more real-world aside: Should Europe envy the United States for its tech sector? No. Aside from the fact that Europeans are living well, tech generates a big negative externality, because among other things it generates tech-bro billionaires, who are corrupting our politics.”

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Land of the free...

2 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
Which Future?

New essay: “Which Future?”

michaelnotebook.com/whichfuture/...

On how to wisely navigate risks from transformative technology, especially artificial superintelligence (ASI). This condenses much of the key thinking from my more extended essays

2 months ago 20 2 0 1

This sounds like an excellent idea.

2 months ago 2 0 0 0

Eliza effect indeed.

@frankfukuyama.bsky.social appears to have befriended with his supportive and well mannered ChatGPT.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

So when you say you found fake journals in GS, you mean you found fake journals in the *reference lists* of real journals indexed in GS?

4 months ago 1 0 1 0

Examples?

4 months ago 0 0 1 0

Merriam-Webster’s human editors have chosen ‘slop’ as the 2025 Word of the Year.

4 months ago 23999 7261 360 936

“If investors continue to price AI companies as if they will capture the economic value of labor rather than the economic value of tools, valuations will outrun reality.”

4 months ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
2025 prize lectures in economic sciences | Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt YouTube video by Nobel Prize

A must watch - Mokyr's Nobel Prize speech on how ideas matter for progress, where AI fits here, and where bad institutional decisions might harm things. His ageless energy and unlimited memory for history are exactly today as I remember as his student 15 years ago. www.youtube.com/live/jQCkCcu...

4 months ago 6 4 0 0

Make it Manuscript Central and we’re on!

4 months ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement
6 months ago 2 0 1 0

This is the best thing I’ve seen since I don’t know when.

7 months ago 2 0 0 0
Preview
Center for the Alignment of AI Alignment Centers We align the aligners

Q. Who aligns the aligners?
A. alignmentalignment.ai

Today I’m humbled to announce an epoch-defining event: the launch of the 𝗖𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗖𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀.

7 months ago 406 123 29 44
7 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
”AI-debatten bör bygga på vetenskap – inte på spekulation” SLUTREPLIK. Argumenten vilar primärt på abstrakta, spekulativa tankeexperiment och påminner mer om science fiction än vetenskap, skriver ai-forskare från Chalmers.

www.nyteknik.se/debatt/ai-de...

7 months ago 3 2 0 0

:-)

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

Archeologists speak of years Before Present (BP), with ‘present’ set to January 1, 1950—just before nuclear bomb testing significantly changed the atmospheric ratio of carbon isotopes.

Given how AI is rapidly flooding the digital world with bullshit, we may need a similar epoch marker—Jan 1 2025?

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

Some really interesting ideas about kinds of research and modes of governance/funding.

8 months ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

😅

8 months ago 1 0 0 0

Wow, thanks!

8 months ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

This is interesting.

8 months ago 1 0 0 0
This PDW examines the central role of artifacts in processes of development and change across fields and practices including entrepreneurship, innovation, project management, strategy, and future-making. In these and other areas, managerial work often amounts to artifact-centered processes in which final outcomes emerge via various “intermediate artifacts” such as conceptual models, material prototypes, digital simulations, and operational plans. Such artifacts serve diverse functions: as focusing devices that produce shared visions and guide concrete actions, as boundary objects that enable feedback and collaboration across domains, and as unfolding artifacts that are left intentionally incomplete to invite creative engagement. While scholars in different fields are theorizing and investigating artifact-centered practices, there is little discussion across fields. This PDW aims to encourage such dialogue.

This PDW examines the central role of artifacts in processes of development and change across fields and practices including entrepreneurship, innovation, project management, strategy, and future-making. In these and other areas, managerial work often amounts to artifact-centered processes in which final outcomes emerge via various “intermediate artifacts” such as conceptual models, material prototypes, digital simulations, and operational plans. Such artifacts serve diverse functions: as focusing devices that produce shared visions and guide concrete actions, as boundary objects that enable feedback and collaboration across domains, and as unfolding artifacts that are left intentionally incomplete to invite creative engagement. While scholars in different fields are theorizing and investigating artifact-centered practices, there is little discussion across fields. This PDW aims to encourage such dialogue.

Looking forward to this (joint TIM, ENT, SAP, OMT) PDW with Jennifer Whyte, Raghu Garud, and Dimo Dimov at the Academy of Management meeting in Copenhagen.

📢 The Role of Artifacts in Managerial Design 📢

#AOM2025
Program link: cdmcd.co/bRavzm

10 months ago 0 1 1 0