What can AI governance learn from the movie Jurassic Park? Find out @ox.ac.uk @torchoxford2013.bsky.social new Pulse Series. Thanks for feat my work on AI's impact on equality, misinformation, work & climate change @oii.ox.ac.uk @socsci.ox.ac.uk
tinyurl.com/3h67h3x8
tinyurl.com/yt2wkmsr
Posts by Sandra Wachter
ProPublica obtained a vast cache of IRS information showing how billionaires like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk pay little in income tax compared to their massive wealth — sometimes, even nothing.
(Published 2021)
Venice calling! Super excited to speak at the Privacy Symposium - if anyone wants to link up, ping me, looking forward to catching up soon! privacysymposium.org/schedule/
Venice calling! Super excited to speak at the Privacy Symposium - if anyone wants to link up, ping me, looking forward to catching up soon! privacysymposium.org/schedule/
Weizenbaum & Friends. Sandra Wachter Distinguished Fellow, Weizenbaum-Institut. Foto von Sandra Wachter.
Weizenbaum & Friends: „Das Weizenbaum-Institut steht für interdisziplinäre und grundlagenorientierte Forschung und das zu Themen, die gesellschaftspolitisch hochaktuell sind. Beeindruckende Bandbreite sowie Tiefe der Forschungsfragen zu Themen wie KI, Klimapolitik, Datenethik oder Misinformation sind bekannte Markenzeichen.“Sandra Wachter über ihr Distinguished Fellowship am Weizenbaum-Institut, Juni 2023
✨Ab heute startet unser neues Format “Weizenbaum & Friends”! Wir stellen euch unsere internationalen Fellows vor. Wir starten mit Sandra Wachter, Professorin für Technologie und Regulierung, die im Juni 2023 als Distinguished Fellow am Weizenbaum-Institut war.
Mehr erfahren 👉 buff.ly/s31KEYq
Palantir CEO promises that his technology will reduce educated women's economic and political power newrepublic.com/post/207693/...
@hiigberlin.bsky.social @wzb.bsky.social @weizenbauminstitut.bsky.social @oii.ox.ac.uk @socsci.ox.ac.uk @oxfordlawfac.bsky.social
"The online environment offers new ground for harassment both in scale and impact. Unless legislators (and society) start to treat these offenses more seriously, tech will be weaponized against women.”
My interview with @newsweek.com & Marni Rose McFall
www.newsweek.com/women-online...
Die KI Industrie (bzw. deren Bosse) schafft es Regulierung zu verteufeln als Innovationsbremse usw.
Sandra Wachter hat Recht mit ihrem Einwand: bei anderen Technikbereichen (zB Verkehr) sind sich alle einig, dass Regulierungen und Standards für Sicherheit und Vertrauen sorgen.
KI braucht Regeln.
@weizenbauminstitut.bsky.social @hiigberlin.bsky.social @oii.ox.ac.uk @socsci.ox.ac.uk
“GenAI is like an unreliable and sloppy employee, they can make your life easier but also much harder. Always double check their work”- my podcast w/Stern we dicuss the environmental impact of AI, bias, AGI &science fiction, workplace automation & the future of education
www.stern.de/wirtschaft/d...
@hiigberlin.bsky.social @socsci.ox.ac.uk @oii.ox.ac.uk @weizenbauminstitut.bsky.social @algorithmwatch.org
Synthetic data is best used as a supporting tool rather than a replacement for real data. The expectation that synthetic data can fill every blind spot or fix every inadequacy of real data is fantastical. my interview ACM Comms & Samuel Greengard cacm.acm.org/news/ai-goes...
"It is simple for companies to take your work and train a model to do your job. It is comparatively difficult for you to protect your work in the first place"
My interview with the BBC and Kerena Cobbina on the need for laws to protect worker rights.
www.bbc.com/news/article...
Great to see @swachter.bsky.social @oii.ox.ac.uk evidence on risks of generative AI being cited in the Treasury Committee report on Artificial Intelligence in financial services. Download the full report: committees.parliament.uk/publications...
Eine Frau steht in einem Gang und sieht in die Kamera.
🤖 KI ist eine Blackbox – aber @swachter.bsky.social hter.bsky.social bringt Licht ins Dunkel.
Im Podcast „Die Boss“ erklärt die Humboldt-Professorin, warum der Begriff „Künstliche Intelligenz“ irreführend ist und wo sie Chancen und Risiken aktueller Modelle sieht.
🎧 plus.rtl.de/podcast/die-...
@hiigberlin.bsky.social @oii.ox.ac.uk @socsci.ox.ac.uk @oxfordlawfac.bsky.social @weizenbauminstitut.bsky.social
My interview on AI regulation, how regulation DOES NOT stifle innovation, who should be liable if these systems fail, if we should use GenAI in schools and unis, how to tackle AI bias, opacity, hallucinations, the carbon footprint and the myth of AGI tinyurl.com/uea5x3vm
“These are actions of people who do not fear consequences or backlash anymore. The market has failed to regulate itself. This is the tech we get when hard regulation does not exist” @swachter.bsky.social
www.newsweek.com/sexualized-d...
"The market has failed to regulate itself. This is the tech we get when hard regulation does not exist" said @swachter.bsky.social @oii.ox.ac.uk@socsci.ox.ac.uk @ox.ac.uk on the need for tighter regulation in light of recent sexualised Grok images. Read the full article: bit.ly/4qOgjQc
My interview @newsweek.com & Marni Rose McFall
“Its devastating that tech firms feel comfortable to release tech that allows the non-consensual undressing of women & children. These are actions of people who do not fear consequences anymore. This is the tech we get when hard regulation does not exist” tinyurl.com/yc72kx66
thank you!
Vielleicht eh mal ein paar Non-Tech-Bro Follow-Empfehlungen von mir zum Thema KI:
• @emilymbender.bsky.social
• @abeba.bsky.social
• @timnitgebru.bsky.social
• @olivia.science
• @alexhanna.bsky.social
• @mmitchell.bsky.social
• @irisvanrooij.bsky.social
• @swachter.bsky.social
Incredibly humbled to have this profile written about me @szde.bsky.social @larryg.bsky.social Lovely to chat about digital sovereignty in Europe, geopolitics & the future of regulation. We must not cave to industry lobbing & sacrifice human rights on the altar of innovation tinyurl.com/mr86dp2e
My interview @newsweek.com with Marni Rose McFall
@oii.ox.ac.uk @socsci.ox.ac.uk @oxfordlawfac.bsky.social
I find it dystopian to claim the era of traditional photography is “over.”It basically says“why capture real genuine human moments if you could just generate them on your computer? I am not sure why we should celebrate the death of art & artists & see this as a sign of progress tinyurl.com/2s4e6ede
Thanks @newsweek.com Hugh Cameron 4 ft my work w/
@bmittelstadt.bsky.social & @cruss.bsky.social
on GenAI, hallucinations & “careless speech” www.newsweek.com/google-boss-...
Thanks @newsweek.com Hugh Cameron 4 ft my work w/
@bmittelstadt.bsky.social & @cruss.bsky.social
on GenAI, hallucinations & “careless speech” www.newsweek.com/google-boss-...
GenAI is extremely prone to hallucinate. If people use LLMs to ask questions they don’t know the answer to, how would they be able to spot a mistake? And now think what can happen if we implement these systems in areas where truth and detail matter e.g. investment decisions, stock market or medicine