🚗 Are EV drivers responsive to public charging prices?
🆕 Check out our latest paper: 'The Impact of Dynamic Prices on Electric Vehicle Public Charging Demand: Evidence from a Nationwide Natural Field Experiment'
Find out more 🔗 www.centrefornetzero.org/papers/the-i...
Details in 🧵
🙏 With thanks to our partners on this trial Electroverse, and the Department for Transport for funding the trial - supported by @cpcatapult.bsky.social - and everyone who contributed: @rmetcalfe.bsky.social @the-scheining.bsky.social @lbernard.bsky.social
🏠 What happens when you install solar PV and batteries on fuel-poor households in the UK?
📊 Using real-world evidence from @octopus.energy customers, CNZ has done some early analysis whilst we run a randomised control trial.
Check it out 👉 www.centrefornetzero.org/news/evaluat...
Cool job up for grabs at CNZ
New Economist role opening up in our team at Centre for Net Zero at @octopus.energy
Come join the team on conducting innovative research in understanding and predicting energy demand.
Please share widely. #econsky
#electrification #energytransition
jobs.lever.co/octoenergy/f...
NEW study on my fav green behavior
Heat pump uptake...⬇️
📉 Reduces home energy use by 40%
📉 Reduces home carbon emissions by 36%
📉 Reduces evening peak energy use by 50% (with time-of-use pricing)
📉 Reduces annual bills by 18%
🔗 bit.ly/3VeWi8f
@the-scheining.bsky.social @rmetcalfe.bsky.social
And our HeatFlex work with @nestauk.bsky.social centrefornetzero.org/papers/heatf... shows a credible way that many households do so and gets under the hood of that method. A pretty soft, non-invasive automation of the thermostat setpoints is sufficient to deliver big kWh impacts. 🚀
Our analysis of Cosy Octopus centrefornetzero.org/papers/decar... showed that customers are already providing massive demand response *right now* 💪
Overall, we now have two pieces of evidence from Centre for Net Zero in the past couple months making me more bullish that heat pumps can provide really meaningful demand flex. We see big impacts, and those big impacts seem pretty high feasibility to me.
And we even know what their internal temperatures were, via the smart thermostat. We see temperature rise during the preheating period (2 hours before event start til event start) and fall during flex window (the next 2 hours).
We also asked customers about their comfort and satisfaction. Response rates were ridiculously good: 81% 😍
Customers tended to be very comfortable and satisfied, both at end of preheating period and end of flex window.
Still, even here, the effects are super duper meaningful –reductions of 1/3 or so. (Again, similar findings in opposite direction for preheating period.)
Effect sizes are smaller when you consider the “whole household” – we think that’s mostly because a lot of these customers have solar and battery, which make “whole household” consumption noisier and lower during the flex window anyway.
Before we did this trial, our team predicted effect sizes would be 20-30%. Instead, we find effect sizes of ~70% reduction in heat pump consumption during the flex window (and a similar increase in the preheating period).
Controlling a HP by raising and lowering a smart thermostat setpoint is a pretty soft intervention. Maybe the HP will rebel. Maybe customers change their setpoints back. Maybe heat loss is too severe. Maybe thermal inertia or other complexities make the effects slow & noisy.
But it'd be nice to get under the hood of people doing that behaviour – to get inside the “black box” of heat pump flexibility. My organization Centre For Net Zero worked with @nestauk.bsky.social on a project called HeatFlex that did just that.
We think most of that is from customers using smart thermostats to schedule their HPs to come on or work harder during off-peak and slow down or turn off during peak times. We discuss in the paper a few different pieces of suggestive evidence for that hypothesized mechanism.