NY Supreme Court Rules the State Must Issue Climate Regulations New York is violating the state’s climate law and must issue regulations to reduce climate pollution by February 2026

Victory! In a landmark decision, the NY Supreme Court ruled in favor of our clients and ordered the State to put forward regulations to reduce climate emissions by February 2026.

The Court:
– confirmed Article 8 applies before harm occurs;
– required EIAs to include scope 3 (combustion) emissions;
– upheld Norway’s staged system (EIA at PDO stage) → no violation.

In short: #KlimaSeniorinnen defined the duty to act.
#GreenpeaceNordic defines how States must act.

Breaking: the @echr.coe.int just ruled in @greenpeace.de Nordic v. Norway — the first procedural #ClimateRights decision.

States must now run science-based, timely, comprehensive EIAs before approving fossil projects ⚖️🌍

The kids who sued America over climate change aren’t done yet They want an international human rights body to hold the U.S. accountable — and are spotlighting Indigenous communities on the frontlines.

📢Check out this piece by @grist.org about a #InternationalHumanRights body to hold the U.S. accountable🌱⚖️and spotlighting #IndigenousCommunities on the frontlines🌏🔥. The Sabin Center’s Dr. Maria Antonia Tigre, @matigre.bsky.social, is quoted in the piece! Read here ➡️

So honored to have co-written this report on the status of global climate litigation!

Thank you!!!

Such an important report - impressive work by @sabincenter.bsky.social @matigre.bsky.social and the @unep.org Law team. You ignore climate law at your peril.

How Global Climate Litigation Is Changing After A Landmark Court Decision (w/ Dr. Maria Antonia Tigre) Podcast Episode · The Climate Pod · 08/19/2025 · 57m

New Episode!

@matigre.bsky.social joins us to discuss the state of global climate litigation and what happened with the ICJ's recent advisory opinion

Listen with the links below.

iOS: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/h...

Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/3SHP...

Climate Litigation and Vulnerabilities | Global South Perspectives | M This volume explores climate litigation as a means to tackle the rights and socio-ecological, intergenerational, gender, racial, and other justice implications

Dive in here: www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-edi...

Co-edited with Melanie Jean Murcott and Susan Ann Samuel, the book highlights how climate lawsuits are addressing overlapping vulnerabilities in the Global South—with gender, race, intergenerational justice, and more at the forefront.

Thrilled to share that the open-access collection Climate Litigation and Vulnerabilities: Global South Perspectives is now published!

Another excellent addition (by @mwgehring.bsky.social) to our symposium on the ICJ’s climate advisory opinion, co-edited with @antoine-despieg.bsky.social and @matigre.bsky.social ✨

Access all other contributions here (and stay tuned for more to come):

📖🔗 verfassungsblog.de/category/deb...

Excited to share new work with Cristian Heredia Ligorria and Cara Schulte! ✨ Our report reviews 78 climate laws in the Caribbean, showing how the region is advancing resilience, climate finance, and rights-based approaches — despite its vulnerability to climate change.

🌴 Read here: lnkd.in/eNZaHXKq

💡According to the Sabin Center’s Maria Antonia Tigre (@matigre.bsky.social), the ICJ’s decision will likely “create [a] new wave of climate litigation.” Read reporting from @NPR.org: buff.ly/ifwfLGV

Quote: “This one seemingly modest paragraph may have profound implications for millions of people fleeing across borders due to climate change, potentially reshaping the legal landscape for those seeking protection and at least offering minimum guarantees against their removal to a place where they would be at risk.”

"A Single Paragraph’s Promise"

LENA RIEMER on the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on climate change and the understated question of climate-induced human displacement.

verfassungsblog.de/icj-advisory...
@sabincenter.bsky.social @matigre.bsky.social @antoine-despieg.bsky.social

What Lliuya v. RWE Means for Climate Change Loss and Damage Claims - Climate Law Blog A plaintiff from the Global South. A carbon giant from the Global North. And a courtroom in a mid-sized German city. On May 28, 2025, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm issued its ruling in what has be...

Companies responsible for large-scale emissions can, at least in principle, be held liable under German civil law for climate-related harms to which they contribute.

@matigre.bsky.social and I unpacked some key points from the recent Lliuya v. RWE ruling:

blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechang...

Rosebank & Jackdaw fields face 'tightened' approval process Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that firms must account for emissions created by the burning of fossil fuels.

The UK gov has just published new guidance for environmental impact assessments for oil & gas projects. Despite reports/industry spin, it includes a genuinely robust, credible approach to assessing the emissions caused by burning oil & gas. Let's take a look! 🧵
www.heraldscotland.com/news/2525207...

An amazing piece of work by my colleague @matigre.bsky.social. If you want to understand what’s happening with climate litigation in Brazil, this is the book for you!

Brazil and Climate Justice "Brazil and Climate Justice" published on 26 May 2025 by Brill | Nijhoff.

Our new book is out with Brill! Climate Litigation in Brazil explores how climate lawsuits surged during an anti-climate presidency, reshaping law & activism. A must-read beyond Brazil.
brill.com/edcollbook/t...
#ClimateJustice #Brazil

Poster of event announcement

Climate change litigation is gaining momentum – but does it deliver real change?

@matigre.bsky.social and I have organized a small webinar with fantastic speakers on the implementation and impact of landmark climate change cases.

📅 April 24
📝 Do sign up here:

events.columbia.edu/cal/event/ev...

🔥 Don’t miss it! See the full program & register here:
🔗 www.crdp.umontreal.ca/nouvelles/20...

#ClimateJustice #Reparations #ClimateChange #ClimateLaw #Sustainability #HumanRights

We have an amazing lineup, including keynotes from @lienvandamme.bsky.social & @joiec.bsky.social! Also excited to welcome close friends @susanannsamuel.bsky.social & Alana Lancaster—and many more!

Join us in person or online for discussions on this urgent issue, organized by Miriam Cohen, Vladyslav Lanovoy, Armando Rocha, Camille Martini, and Enéas Xavier. @vlanovoy.bsky.social @armandorocha.bsky.social @sabincenter.bsky.social

📢 Exciting Conference Announcement! 📢

Thrilled to share that we’re co-hosting an incredible conference on Climate Change & Reparations at the University of Montreal this April! 🌍⚖️

🔗 www.crdp.umontreal.ca/nouvelles/20...

This case could reshape corporate climate accountability worldwide. More in my article: scholarship.law.columbia.edu/sabin_climat...

Key questions before the court:
🌍 Is there a serious threat to Lliuya’s property?
💨 How much did RWE’s CO₂ emissions contribute?

#ClimateJustice #ClimateLitigation #SaúlLucianoLliuya #RWE #CorporateAccountability

Lliuya, a Peruvian farmer and mountain guide, argues that Europe’s biggest emitter should pay its share of damages for the glacier melt threatening his home. In 2022, German judges even traveled to Peru to assess the risk—a rare step in climate litigation.

🚨 Landmark Climate Case Update 🚨

On March 17 & 19, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm will hold a public hearing in Saúl Luciano Lliuya v. RWE—a groundbreaking climate lawsuit. climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/...

The Role of Advisory Opinions in International Law in the Context of the Climate Crisis "The Role of Advisory Opinions in International Law in the Context of the Climate Crisis" published on 24 Jul 2025 by Brill | Nijhoff.

Are you interested in the climate change advisory opinions? We have one exciting update to share. Armando Rocha and I co-edited an incredible book with amazing authors that will be available in the summer. You can see more here and watch out for pre-order dates! brill.com/edcollbook-o...

🔹 🌎 NAFTA Arbitration: The ICSID tribunal ruled that emissions allowances are not considered property under NAFTA, impacting cross-border carbon trading disputes.
📄 Case: KS&T v. Canada