To add a bit of reflexivity (and I'm Francophiliamaxxing here), how does the researcher structure the space of possible explanations, and what dispositions and apparatuses actually organize the problem space through which plausible alternatives are made intelligible?

The bold call to resurrect the Graham Platner discourse.

Rebecca Elliot's (@rfelliott.bsky.social‬) "Underwater: Loss, Flood Insurance, and the Moral Economy of Climate Change in the United States" is an excellent book that examines how moral claims on loss and compensation undergird flood insurance markets in the US.