I like IPAs.

But I also like Pabst Blue Ribbon.

I also didn’t watch last night.

Likewise, as adopting renewable technologies becomes attractive to consumers regardless of their views on anthropogenic climate change, I also find common cause with them.

Folks who understand AGW do not need to be convinced of the virtues of fossil fuel free energy services.

As it became clear to me that renewable technologies had a solid business case that was separate from ‘the climate agenda’, folks who I did not agree with politically would pursue these businesses. I wish for all the greedy motherfuckers to find success displacing fossil fuel.

KOCH Industries sold their Direct Lithium Extraction business unit late last year, so I am relieved of feeling the need to wish for the success of a KOCH business unit.

I do wish for all businesses or individuals to displace fossil fuels, whether I agree with them on other political issues or not.

Seeking to depoliticize climate change and renewable energy will get us to net zero more quickly than perpetuate any culture war side-ism of solar PV or EVs.

We already have conservatives adopting these technologies, attempting to push them away will slow the transition.

If only half the population switches away from fossil fuels, our future will be grim.

You think that a politically polarized term will advance the adoption of fossil fuel displacing technologies?

Interesting.

It’s been a moment since external combustion vehicles traveled our roads.

Combustion Vehicle ought to be the proper inverse term for the Electric Vehicle.

TBF, that is pretty much what I said in the graphic, so no disagreement.

Wait, you mean this IEA, whose audience is mainly fossil fuel interests and has continually under forecast the rise of solar power.

Chris Wright is looking for woke in all the wrong places.

Powell Point Vista on UT-12.

The 2026 SUAVE rally will be on October 3, between two SuperChargers, one in Torrey, UT and the other in Bryce Canyon City.

Our National Parks are becoming more accessible for EVs.

One way of decreasing the soft cost of solar installations is to remove them all at once.

A $100 fee would be more in line with current federal fuel tax, so $250 is indeed more than $100.

Eventually, the federal fuel tax will need to be replaced by a fee EV owners pay.

I wouldn’t begrudge paying a fair amount for to federal highway funds.

How ICE is using far-right subculture to recruit YouTube video by CBC News: The National

Some of the best reporting on ICE is coming from Canada.

youtu.be/TNh_jl3QePI?...

If plugging in your phone was as convenient as fueling your combustion vehicle, you would probably get an electric phone.

To be fair, it looks like he sweats a lot, regardless.

Less than zero sum.

Do high school nerds still memorize pi to 50 digits?

Only if you say something nice about Trump first though.

"The best time to impeach the president of the United States was January 20. The second best time is now."

—ancient Chinese proverb

It will be great for oligarchs though.

I’m trying to imagine exactly who it would be that would think that reshoring combustion car manufacturing was good business.

It seems a tariff on car buyin might chill the drillin.

I’m not interested in owning a combustion vehicle.

Sell your combustion vehicle.

Neither I nor my spouse have tested positive.

We still mask on public transit.

We are on public transit right now.