Advertisement Β· 728 Γ— 90

Posts by Connor Barry

No problem with anyone standing with the farming community.I do object to genuine concerns being turned into far right propaganda and a few cowboys thinking they speak for everyone .

1 week ago 4 1 0 0

(Ah here - what are you doing confusing 2 psychology theories with a basic law of maths)

2 months ago 3 0 1 0

Ha. Next thing you'll be telling us guns and SUVs kill people.

Extreme left woke mind virus....

6 months ago 0 0 0 0

I wish people would stop describing things that are indisputably provable as a matter of fact as "controversial." People not liking a fact doesn't mean the fact is controversial. Reality is not malleable around our beliefs and it shouldn't be. We need to stop acting like it is.

10 months ago 2083 536 44 44

Last go they sent their worst and oldest...

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

Snap

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Have you done modelling integrating wind + solar given likely cost curve of same.

DC planner here looking on how to optimally disperse a few (hundred?) GW of new flat, inflex demand in 200MW chunks geographically.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

- Elevator Boy, NYC
- Oyster Farmer, Germany
- Intern at Vatican Museums
Stockbroker
- Logistics Manager for Olympic Games, Greece, Italy, Qatar
- Telecoms Accountant, Portugal
- Head of BizDev for >65s package hols in US & China
- Audit Prog Mgr Google

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
a group of sheep are walking in a line with a truck behind them Alt: Sheep fecking riverdancing
1 year ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

Woop woop!

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Hi! Irish/EU climate/energy policy addict for about past 15 years. Twitterati since year 1. Big fan Leah!

Currently EU lead for a large Datacenter owner in the weeds of decarbonising. Nerd on all things sustainability accounting.

Joy of seeing a troll free thread😍

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

He's a Shellenberg/Epstein wannabe who specialises in that type of plausible sounding disinfo.

Blocked him a year ago.

Unfortunately, shit attracts eyeballs over there.

2 years ago 1 0 1 0

Get wealthy!!

2 years ago 1 0 0 0

Follow Friday. I may weep. I haven't seen a follow Fri recommendation for about a decade.

2 years ago 1 0 0 0

My kids givING this serious respect t

2 years ago 1 0 1 0

The end.

Yeah.

2 years ago 1 0 0 0

There are a lot a lot of devil in the detail - but it is being talked through

2 years ago 1 0 1 0

Every DC over 1MW (lots) is obliged to export, unless technically or economically impossible, also under EED.

Germany has transposed as a 40% waste reuse factor by 2025/6 ( almost impossible as far fewer offtakers than amount of export).

Am on EUDCA WG on waste heat

2 years ago 1 0 2 0

From May 2024, every DC in Europe (under Energy Efficiency directive) needs to publicly report by site : power & water usage, PUE, WUE, waste heat usage... and a bunch of other data

2 years ago 3 0 1 0
Advertisement

The more expedient pushback on LNG export from NA would be that it increases gas prices for US consumers.

Apocalypse of humanity aside of course...

2 years ago 0 0 0 0

They'll need a break after a busy Q4 2049.

2 years ago 2 0 0 0

Don't be a DAChead about CDR

2 years ago 0 0 0 0

I stand corrected. Thx.

Lol πŸ˜„

2 years ago 1 0 1 0

I never said I "liked" scope 3. πŸ˜‰

It's a pain in the hole. Just a useful one at times.

2 years ago 0 0 0 0

I mean I've given you a whole bunch of concrete (sic) examples of where counting and owning scope 3 results in carbon reductions but not a lot more I can do if you have priors.

2 years ago 0 0 1 0

A recent nearby AWS DC scope 3 calc has led to engineering out 50% of embodied carbon under baseline. Until you're counting, you don't know what's important.

And as for steel/concrete, early buyers matter

climateaccord.org/press-releas...

2 years ago 1 0 1 0

Say I hypothetically run a 100MW datacentre.

My scope 1 are tiny as my backup gens are never used.
My scope 2 is (actually!) zero where my IT customer determines drawdown by IT load and power is € passthru.

My scope 3 is €1B of construction capex that I determine and can reduce intensity by 50%!

2 years ago 0 0 1 0

I don't think in 2023 that is true any more.

Most activities can be electrified.

There is a challenge in that some things/activities should not exist (at least at current unbridled/zero-assumed-consequence) levels.

Phasing out/down those activities impossible w/o Scope 3.

2 years ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

The DC industry has moved wholesale to embrace HVO over diesel.

I'm slightly less concerned vs suggestion of heating in that fuel storage is for the grid outage that never happens. Fuel is almost never actually combusted and just sits bunkered.

Use case IF it needs to exist can't be electrified.

2 years ago 2 0 1 0

In most cases, the decision to emit is the systemic decision of multiple actors - it only takes one along value chain to dig heels in for inertia to prevent stopping emission.

It doesn't matter if there is double counting. We are not making a jigsaw.

2 years ago 3 0 1 0