Posts by Dennis P Waters
Our series, “How We Came To Know Earth,” is a guide to the modern understanding of fundamental climate science. Vote for it in this year's Webby Awards:
Journey with writer @maxlevy.bsky.social and a team of researchers through the Arctic tundra as they sample some of Earth’s rarest and most restricted fungal species — underground wisps that govern life aboveground. www.quantamagazine.org/an-arctic-ro...
For better or worse, McLuhan gave it a try. I find the biological analogies useful, like Maynard Smith and Szathmáry's book. They talk about “the way in which information is transmitted between generations” as being key to major transitions in evolution. Woese also good on this.
Elizabeth Eisenstein is good on effects of printing press, Ithiel de Sola Pool on the telephone, Jack Goody and David Olson on literacy. All qualitative, though.
Yes, I get that. I suspect we have differing views on what mathematics is. I'm inclined toward a Turing-computational approach, which is not everyone's cup of tea. Nonetheless this is a useful pursuit. Schmandt-Besserat has some good thoughts on the bifurcation of early writing into text and math.
Seems to me that the adjectival property of "threeness" is part of natural language. In mathematics, "3" is a symbol that is related to other symbols by rules. Are there Venn diagrams of natural language and math in which their overlap contains "3" and other evolved, intuitive math concepts?
Not sure how linguists would deal with it as it has no natural semantics, just "deliberate semantics" as Vygotsky would say. There are certainly linguists who eschew semantics, but I imagine they would find mathematics boring as all of the rules are given in advance.
Resolutions passed by county commission on 2/24. You can download 'em.
Block 2701, lots 2, 6, 32.02, 85-90
This is "Aldo Leopold's Big Woods" behind the campus. It will be preserved open space adjacent to the township's Loveless Preserve. It includes an option on an easement to facilitate the Johnson Trolley Trail including the proposed bike/ped bridge across 295.
Home of the ever so appealing Cartlidge Meats....
"Therefore there must be two states of this copolymer; perhaps a straight chain which serves as a memory, and a folded conformation which can selectively interact with the environment.” 2/2
Interesting to note that Howard Pattee anticipated the ribozyme from first principles in 1966: "“The memory and transcription functions must occur at different times; that is, the sequence of copolymers cannot act as a degenerate memory and a non-degenerate selective structure at the same time." 1/2
A small polymerase ribozyme that can synthesize itself and its complementary strand | Science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... - this looks super cool, but does it really relate to the origin of life?
Imagine! I mean, imagine how hard it is for a quadratic equation to understand itself! Imagine how hard it is for that statement to have any meaning whatsoever!
I like thinking of the gene regulatory network as an organ - a little chemical brain. And it seems reasonable to think of the adaptive responsiveness of the cell as reflecting a kind of cognition.
Updated Chapter 1 of my lectures notes for the Evolutionary Systems course.
casci.binghamton.edu/academics/i-...
And it will mark the 100th birthday of Howard Pattee!
New paper led by @amahury.bsky.social published in JRS Interface:
"Closing the loop: how semantic closure enables open-ended evolution?"
royalsocietypublishing.org/rsif/article...
By "memory" you mean long-term perception?
Humans, of course, are the ultimate allosteric devices, almost infinitely reconfigurable.
It appears that Rider used the prospective WCC sale funds as collateral for loans that funded operating deficits. The money they got from the sale repaid those loans. So there's nothing left.
I doubt von Neumann would agree that DNA sequences are computer code. As he wrote in TSRA, "by axiomatizing automata in this manner, one has thrown half of the problem out of the window, and it may be the more important half." It's the stuff that can't be formalized that's interesting.
I continue to think the the more interesting question is "how does language acquire children?"