It only affects between 0.018 and 1.7% of the population. The swab test will highlight any individuals requiring further investigation and prevent the active recruitment of males with DSDs to compete in the female category.
Sometimes a post is so objectionable you have to presume there is another agenda.....solidarity, hold the line. 😉
Female athletes might be a tad disappointed but why stop at sport? Do we care if the female sex is entirely subsumed into a hellscape of male paraphilia? We might as well throw the children in for good measure, the MAPS will be pleased. After all, only male sexual rights matter.
Well we know who else had a penchant for book burning.....
Thanks to Jenny and everyone who stood up to the Emperor parading his 'new clothes'. They took the heat while the rest of us were wading through the institutional capture of the NHS, Education, Emergency Services and Govt. The virtue-signallers and hard of thinking threw us under the bus.
The truth is that no parent should ever have allowed that situation to occur. Denying basic reality, no matter how strong the feelings, leads to delusion and disappointment.
Shutting down discussion with insult and refusal to 1) listen to women 2) accept evidence-based fact are why the extreme elements of the Trans community are so damaging to themselves and society in general. Women don't consent to share their sex category with men and that must be accepted.
No. MEN are banned female events.
With all this crying about the decision of the IOC, people again only centre the male point of view.
This is about the women's competition and nobody is talking about what the female athletes want.
The IOC however, asked them:
Do you think this will win hearts and minds? Or, is it just about inciting VAWG?
Ensuring female space is single sex is a good starting point.
Were they violent or disruptive? Did police have to be called? In a democracy it is usually considered civilized to hear opposing political views. Many TRAs attend womens' rights events with intent to disrupt and harm. Women don't do that.
Christmas. It was Christmas.
The discussion about Emma Watson has raked up a lot of lies about JK Rowling. Lies that most of all point to the fact that most of these people never really read Rowlings essay or listened to the podcast: "the witch trials".
James Dreyfuss says it best:
Lies.
GLP has such a good track record in these cases......
Disagree by all means but insinuate that a woman is 'hard', 'difficult' or 'unwell' for not cowing down to the opinions of men... It's misogyny 101. Fry argues against all faith based religions except genderism because it is the pet cause of the privileged, cultural elite to which he belongs.
If males are included in your definition of 'women and girls' then the whole sex-based representation premise is meaningless. You just mean people.
You can turn off intolerance and other labels in the moderation settings.
A travesty.
a) You can define sex as those in elite sport are about to find out. It's a simple cheek swab. b) A man's perception of female experience isn't female experience c) Trans identifying females retain all rights in law pertaining to maternity and health because of their sex.
And I thought this was supposed to be the 'kind' platform....
How a doctor can be that confused about sex is positively life threatening.
A woman who tried to avoid a biological man in what should be a single-sex space and explained the reason for her discomfort to him, is not a bully. Read the tribunal transcript. The doctor doesn't present well.
Nobody asked to check when a middle-aged AGP took over our work facilities. Everything was on display whether women wanted to see or not. He left soon after he made the mistake of exposing himself to a young, pregnant woman whose husband also worked on site. The conversation was short.
