Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Jakub Stauber

Preview
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

Read our full analysis of how this unfolded here:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

The ultimate polarizing issue? Vaccination. 💉
While mask-wearing showed some divides, the intention to vaccinate became the single strongest indicator of societal polarization. By the later waves, your party preference was a better predictor of your health choices than the actual health risks.

2 months ago 2 0 1 0

Crucially, this polarization wasn't two groups drifting apart equally. It was asymmetric.
The data shows that the widening gap was largely driven by a specific segment, voters of the radical right, radicalizing their non-compliance, while the mainstream remained relatively cohesive.

2 months ago 1 0 1 0

So, when did the break happen?
Our models show the fracture widening significantly after Summer 2020.
As the crisis continued, the "fear" factor faded, and political identity took over. Polarization wasn't driven by the severity of the virus, but by the politicization of the response.

2 months ago 1 0 1 0

Using 38 waves of panel data, we clearly see a massive "Rally around the Flag" effect in early 2020. 🇨🇿
Initially, fear of the virus trumped politics. Compliance was high across the board. The polarization we talk about today didn't exist yet. Society held together.

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

There is a common narrative that the pandemic immediately fractured society.
But our data tells a different story.
In our new article in Political Studies Review, we track the timeline of polarization in Czechia.🧵
@psrjournal.bsky.social
@fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz

2 months ago 2 1 1 0

Check out chesdata.eu for the 1999-2024 CHES trend file, along with individual year surveys with both means and expert-level datasets.

We are also happy to release an updated CHES Shiny (CHES Interactive on the website) at chesdata.shinyapps.io/Shiny-CHES/!

5 months ago 14 6 0 0
Advertisement

Join us today!

@fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz

6 months ago 2 1 0 0
Preview
The transnationalisation of military leaders in Central and Eastern Europe and EURO-Atlantic integration The professional transnationalisation of Central and Eastern European (CEE) militaries has been a pivotal factor in their integration into the Euro-Atlantic security community. This article examine...

New OA article: The transnationalisation of military leaders in Central and Eastern Europe and EURO-Atlantic integration by @tomaskucera.bsky.social www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

7 months ago 4 5 1 0

Thanks a lot!

9 months ago 1 0 0 0

Thank you!

9 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Don’t count on the U.S.: can Russia achieve a rapid breakthrough in central Europe? The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has significantly worsened the European security outlook. Simultaneously, concerns are growing over the United States’ willingness to commit substantial forces ...

7/7 🚩
European NATO can stop Russia without U.S. ground forces—if it acts decisively and prepares.
Our full open-access paper here:
📄 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

9 months ago 2 1 0 0

6/
Why does it matter?
With U.S. focus shifting to China and political will declining, Europe must prepare to defend itself.
Our work shows this is possible—but only if Europeans invest now in troops, reserves, and logistics.

9 months ago 1 0 1 0

5/
🗝️ Key findings:

Numbers & readiness > technology alone

Deep, well-prepared defenses lower risks

Rapid NATO reinforcement is critical

Tech helps but can’t replace manpower

9 months ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

4/
In the larger Russian force scenario (with conscripts):
⚠️ Europe would need ~20+ brigades, stretching its capabilities.
Even then, success is uncertain without deep defenses & low troop exposure.

9 months ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

3/
In the smaller Russian force scenario:
✅ ~10–13 European brigades (beyond Poland’s) are enough to prevent a breakthrough if deployed quickly.

But:
If Poland fights alone, Russia’s chances of success rise fast.

9 months ago 1 0 1 0

2/
We simulate a Russian attack on northeastern Poland (Suwalki Gap) in the late 2020s.
Two scenarios:
🇷🇺 ~120k troops (professionals)
🇷🇺 ~200k troops (with conscripts)
We test how many NATO brigades are needed to stop a breakthrough in 3–4 weeks.

9 months ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement
Post image

1/ 🧵 Can Europe defend itself if the U.S. steps back?
Our new study asks: Can European NATO members alone stop a Russian breakthrough in Poland? We model two scenarios and here’s what we found 👇

9 months ago 5 4 3 0