Luckily itās already sinking
Posts by Nick
You can nominate this post to the Bluesky landmark and preservation board
Someone should landmark the sinking ship garage.
It's architecturally iconic and a critical component to understand the city's relationship with the preservation movement
I see. Sorry for getting triggered
You could do a suboptimal placement. You can also add a crossover just south of ID station which would at least help a bit
You def donāt need to blast to add them
Also, people always justify lounges as being cheaper than airport food but like you can just eat at home or in a real restaurant outside the airport. Why show up hours early to justify your purchases?
Thereās no reason to spend more time in the airport than you need to.
If I arrive to the gate before boarding starts, I lost.
Conversely, if the suburban subareas are not penciling and an automated metro study (like the tunnel one from Claudia) concludes significant cost savings, the suburban subareas may start begging for an automated WS/Ballard link instead of ditching scope in the suburbs
I have a feeling like this may be the next Race the L8.
āMont-LATEā lid anyone?
Or they spend 30 seconds explaining theyāre about to check fares so they canāt check a whole car between stops. Abroad, one person enters the car and screams āticketsā and rushes through them all
If they were to do this before May 1, they could get it on the August ballot
You say the county council has no power here which is technically true but couldnāt they could submit a charter amendment to voters asking for the authority to remove the assessor?
Would be interested to know how much housing levy revenues would increase if MHA were eliminated
For Ballard at least (and WS to an extent), the coast guard make sure the elevated approach was most expensive
If I understand right, Seattle has pledged it if needed. ST will only ask for it if the tunneled option is more expensive than the elevated one, which I think is no longer the case?
Seattle pledged that 3p funding and I think is on the hook to provide it is ST asks for it
I understand that but if youāre advocating to automate WS, we canāt build it now, we need new designs
I think we should control our costs and bring in people to drive that (as weāve done previously) but thereās not some Copenhagen style cost cutting memo staff forgot to read.
It will take time to reduce costs and may not be possible in a reasonable timeframe
Yea I think weāre agreeing. Just saying we canāt put all our eggs into one basket of ācut costā but we certainly should try
Even if you make the stations half as large, that doesnāt make the project half the price. I understand what youāre saying and I agree ALM > Link
I agree with you but it adds a lot of risk to the project. What if itās 2030 and we havenāt reduced costs?
WS also needs to be viewed in context. Collectively, buses in west Seattle spend about half their time going between it and downtown
Yes they have (I think exclusive) control over fares and fare enforcement
Ok but now youāre talking about delaying west Seattle a few years.
How would the tunnels and bridges be cheaper?
I suppose it is an answer but it is not a solution
The Seattle subarea gets a 49% discount on the Ballard Link. Suburbanites want redundancy and are willing to pay for it.
Will an automated metro really be half the price? Are we really expecting sound transit to solve the countryās cost disease?
Or a day pass with every hotel stay!
I think this photo is AI. The trees arenāt casting shadows and some of the people donāt appear to have heads
Thereās a higher res version on Reddit
This seems to also be true of reforms that make units nicer like eliminating side setbacks and single stair reform which seem to be driven by architects not developers